Am Die, den 18.11.2003 schrieb Branden Robinson um 16:43:
> For example, it turns out a "di-discover" tool wasn't needed after all;
> it was possible to pass arguments to the existing discover utility to
> get output in the format desired by the d-i team.
>
> * discover/discover/Makefile.in
>
[Branden Robinson, 2003-11-18]
> For example, it turns out a "di-discover" tool wasn't needed after all;
> it was possible to pass arguments to the existing discover utility to
> get output in the format desired by the d-i team.
>
> * discover/discover/Makefile.in
> discover/discover/didisc
Am Die, den 18.11.2003 schrieb Branden Robinson um 16:43:
> [Please CC me on replies.]
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 04:38:20PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > [Branden Robinson]
> > > Please feel free to go ahead.
> > >
> > > Progeny is concentrating on Discover 2.x:
> >
> > This sounds ver
[Please CC me on replies.]
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 04:38:20PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Branden Robinson]
> > Please feel free to go ahead.
> >
> > Progeny is concentrating on Discover 2.x:
>
> This sounds very good. When will this result in replies regarding the
> patches we have be
[Branden Robinson]
> Please feel free to go ahead.
>
> Progeny is concentrating on Discover 2.x:
This sounds very good. When will this result in replies regarding the
patches we have been working on in the d-i team to get it to work with
d-i. As far as I know, we are now waiting for Progeny to
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 06:30:56PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Well, nothing really happened on these bugs since I opened
> themseveral weeks ago.
[...]
> However, discoiver is used by the debian-installer, so I guess we
> should have it use gettext for debconf templates...and have its
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
