On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 14:57, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Alastair McKinstry [Sun, Jul 27 2003, 02:26:46PM]:
> > As the maintainer of whiptail, I was not aware of this bug, which was
> > filed against modconf. In the current newt package, whiptail and
> > whiptail-utf8 were merged; modconf s
#include
* Alastair McKinstry [Sun, Jul 27 2003, 02:26:46PM]:
> As the maintainer of whiptail, I was not aware of this bug, which was
> filed against modconf. In the current newt package, whiptail and
> whiptail-utf8 were merged; modconf seems to work fine for me now.
>
> (There are some minor gr
As the maintainer of whiptail, I was not aware of this bug, which was
filed against modconf. In the current newt package, whiptail and
whiptail-utf8 were merged; modconf seems to work fine for me now.
(There are some minor graphical issues in utf-8 mode, due to an error in
slang, for which a patc
>
> I am not sure, current whiptail looks completely broken, in UTF-8 mode
> as well as with non-UTF-8 locales. If the maintainer does not even
> manage to reply to my bug report, I guess we will have to go back and
> fork a working whiptail-utf8 again.
>
> Just my 0.02ยค, still hadn't time to get
#include
* Junichi Uekawa [Sun, Jul 27 2003, 08:15:22AM]:
> tags 191636 + patch
> thanks
>
>
> Hi,
>
> whiptail-utf8 has now become 'whiptail', and so modconf can
> just conflict with older versions of whiptail
>
> Conflicts: whiptail (<< 0.51.4-1)
I am not sure, current whiptail looks comple
tags 191636 + patch
thanks
Hi,
whiptail-utf8 has now become 'whiptail', and so modconf can
just conflict with older versions of whiptail
Conflicts: whiptail (<< 0.51.4-1)
--- modconf-0.2.44-orig/debian/changelog2002-09-15 05:30:58.0 +0900
+++ modconf-0.2.45/debian/changelog
6 matches
Mail list logo
