On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 10:44:23AM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> The adjtimex bug has been assigned to libc6 already, with a note that
> its now severity serious as it breaks d-i. I'm proposing to do binary
> NMUs for alpha, ia64 busybox-cvs : hence I'm CC'ing all the uploaders
> for busybox
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 10:44:23AM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> The adjtimex bug has been assigned to libc6 already, with a note that
> its now severity serious as it breaks d-i. I'm proposing to do binary
> NMUs for alpha, ia64 busybox-cvs : hence I'm CC'ing all the uploaders
> for busybox
On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 10:38, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 04:19:31PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> > > I'll take a look at the adjtimex problem. However, static binaries are
> > > always going to be second-class citizens as far as glibc is concerned
> > > and you should avoi
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 04:19:31PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> > I'll take a look at the adjtimex problem. However, static binaries are
> > always going to be second-class citizens as far as glibc is concerned
> > and you should avoid them whenever possible.
> Ok, how about doing that? not
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 15:26, Philip Blundell wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 13:56, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> > I'm raising the severity of this bug to serious, as it breaks
> > busybox-cvs build on alpha, which in turn breaks the
> > debian-installer build on alpha.
>
> If you need a quick reso
5 matches
Mail list logo
