On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 10:38, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 04:19:31PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > > > I'll take a look at the adjtimex problem. However, static binaries are > > > always going to be second-class citizens as far as glibc is concerned > > > and you should avoid them whenever possible. > > Ok, how about doing that? not building a static version of busybox on > > alpha until this bug is resolved? (and applying the known-to-work patch > > for ia64/alpha). It would get d-i building again. > > reassign to libc6 as they are problems of this package. ia64 may be > fixable by a binary nmu. > > bastian
The adjtimex bug has been assigned to libc6 already, with a note that its now severity serious as it breaks d-i. I'm proposing to do binary NMUs for alpha, ia64 busybox-cvs : hence I'm CC'ing all the uploaders for busybox CVS (its maintainer is set to debian-boot). Any objections? Regards, Alastair -- Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG Key fingerprint = 9E64 E714 8E08 81F9 F3DC 1020 FA8E 3790 9051 38F4 He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself. - --Thomas Paine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]