In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
>I'm not so confident. Particularly if you either include devfsd or do
>not mount devfs, it should not change much beyond the occasional /proc
>message.
Never underestimate the fragility of the boot-floppies code base. There is
a reason
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 01:17:33PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm pretty strongly opposed to this idea.
>
> Why?
Because devfs is a useful feature, and I get the impression from
debian-powerpc that many people are using it on PowerPC. I'm
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 01:33:05AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Unfortunately boot-floppies doens't currently support devfs. Colin
> > found an issue with parsing of /proc/partitions, but I'm afraid
> > that's probably just the tip of the iceburg.
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unfortunately boot-floppies doens't currently support devfs. Colin
> found an issue with parsing of /proc/partitions, but I'm afraid
> that's probably just the tip of the iceburg. Getting devfs support
> into boot-floppies would set us back at least 2
4 matches
Mail list logo