On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> Thanks for investigating (and hopefully fixing) this. I just upload
>> net-retriever with your changes.
>
> Appreciated your help!
> So I can test tomorrow's d-i daily, again.
I
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Roger Shimizu (rogershim...@gmail.com):
>> Could you help to make a release for d-i repo: net-retriever.git?
>> I confirm it fixes the runtime issue of d-i.
>> And the d-i daily is broken anyway, so my fix won't make things worse.
Quoting Roger Shimizu (rogershim...@gmail.com):
> Dear Christian, Cyril,
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Karsten Merker wrote:
> >>
> >> I have just tried a test install with today's armhf daily netboot
> >> images, and net-retriever
Dear Christian, Cyril,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Karsten Merker wrote:
>>
>> I have just tried a test install with today's armhf daily netboot
>> images, and net-retriever fails:
>>
>> Jan 1 02:56:42 net-retriever: error:
>> main/d
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Karsten Merker wrote:
>
> I have just tried a test install with today's armhf daily netboot
> images, and net-retriever fails:
>
> Jan 1 02:56:42 net-retriever: error:
> main/debian-installer/binary-armhf/Packages.xz not found in
> /tmp/net-retriever-1160-Releas
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Colin Watson (2016-03-16):
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:54:03AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> > Pretty sure this breaks (will break, when the change is propagated outside
>> > experimental) d-i as it stands, due to the check on all 3
Colin Watson (2016-03-16):
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:54:03AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Pretty sure this breaks (will break, when the change is propagated outside
> > experimental) d-i as it stands, due to the check on all 3 checksums in
> > net-retriever.
>
> Looking at the code, I don
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:26:25AM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>
> debootstrap already requires xz support: the binary packages are
> compressed with xz (at least data.tar.xz).
Ahh, this is a fair point, since we failed to make everything in the
debootstrap set compressed with gzip (which I th
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:54:03AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Pretty sure this breaks (will break, when the change is propagated outside
> experimental) d-i as it stands, due to the check on all 3 checksums in
> net-retriever.
Looking at the code, I don't think that's true. It skips checksum
Hi,
Adam Conrad writes:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:15:16PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> Additionally I turned off generating gzip compressed versions of those
>> files, xz is there.
>
> This will break debootstrap. If we think it's okay for debootstrap to
> depend on xzutils (is that ubiquito
Hi,
And thanks for the heads-up.
Joerg Jaspert (2016-03-15):
> I've just activated a few changes to the archive we talk(ed) about for a
> long time. And while it is not exactly the start of this release cycle,
> it should still work out nicely (so one hopes).
>
> As of now, InRelease/Release fi
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:15:16PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
> Additionally I turned off generating gzip compressed versions of those
> files, xz is there.
This will break debootstrap. If we think it's okay for debootstrap to
depend on xzutils (is that ubiquitous enough on all Linux installa
12 matches
Mail list logo
