On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:54:03AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Pretty sure this breaks (will break, when the change is propagated outside > experimental) d-i as it stands, due to the check on all 3 checksums in > net-retriever.
Looking at the code, I don't think that's true. It skips checksums that are missing from Release, and it stops after the first checksum that it successfully finds. Unless I'm looking at the wrong bit of net-retriever? -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
