Re: Processed: reassign 238341 to kernel-image-2.4.24-1-generic

2004-03-23 Thread Aneesh Kumar KV
Herbert Xu wrote: merge 231370 238341 quit On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 08:48:08AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 reassign 238341 kernel-image-2.4.24-1-generic Bug

Re: Processed: reassign 238341 to kernel-image-2.4.24-1-generic

2004-03-23 Thread Herbert Xu
merge 231370 238341 quit On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 08:48:08AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > > reassign 238341 kernel-image-2.4.24-1-generic &g

Re: Processed: reassign 238600 to kernel-image-2.4.24-1-generic

2004-03-23 Thread Herbert Xu
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 08:48:08AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > > reassign 238600 kernel-image-2.4.24-1-generic > Bug#238600: debian-i

Processed: reassign 238341 to kernel-image-2.4.24-1-generic

2004-03-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 238341 kernel-image-2.4.24-1-generic Bug#238341: debian-installer hangs on qlogicisp (Alpha Platform) Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `k

Processed: reassign 238600 to kernel-image-2.4.24-1-generic

2004-03-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 238600 kernel-image-2.4.24-1-generic Bug#238600: debian-installer system error configuring tulip card (Alpha Platform) Bug reassigned from package `debian-install

Woody Bootable CD with 2.4.24 kernel

2004-03-02 Thread Roalt Zijlstra
nstalled a 2.4.20 kernel. After modification it installs a 2.4.24 kernel and it has some common used SCSI adapters included. Maybe there are already other projects covering this field but I haven't found any installing a 2.4.24 kernel. I have the ISO downloadable on http://mail.kwenie.org/debia

Processed: reassign 231370 to kernel-image-2.4.24-1-generic

2004-02-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 231370 kernel-image-2.4.24-1-generic Bug#231370: qlogic driver fails on Alpha Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `kernel-image-2.4.24-1-generic&

Bug#230464: IBM Thinkpad R40e: fail - no keyboard response with 2.4.24 kernel

2004-01-30 Thread Leonard Norrgard
blems: No response to keyboard. It's not a USB keyboard (verified in Knoppix 3.3). The kernel in the build is: 2.4.24-1-386 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) #1 Tue Jan 6 19:18:04 EST 2004 A daily build from 2004-01-28 instead has a 2.4.22 kernel, where the keyboard works. This older build still lacks the nec

Re: 2.4.24 on i386

2004-01-26 Thread Joey Hess
Frederik Dannemare wrote: > I don't have problems with 2.4.24 either, but then again, I don't have any > SMP boxes. If we go with 2.4.24, we should al least include the SMP > deadlock fix from 2.4.25-pre5. Unless the plan is not to stick with 2.4.24 > for the final sarge

Re: 2.4.24 on i386

2004-01-26 Thread Frederik Dannemare
Frederik Dannemare wrote: Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 06:31:40PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: What say we move i386 up to the 2.4.24 kernel? All the udebs are already available, all images build ok (and still fit!), and I have even done partial CD installs using 2.4.24, though

Re: 2.4.24 on i386

2004-01-26 Thread Frederik Dannemare
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 06:31:40PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: What say we move i386 up to the 2.4.24 kernel? All the udebs are already available, all images build ok (and still fit!), and I have even done partial CD installs using 2.4.24, though never all the way due to

Re: 2.4.24 on i386

2004-01-25 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 06:31:40PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > What say we move i386 up to the 2.4.24 kernel? All the udebs are already > available, all images build ok (and still fit!), and I have even done > partial CD installs using 2.4.24, though never all the way due to the >

2.4.24 on i386

2004-01-25 Thread Joey Hess
What say we move i386 up to the 2.4.24 kernel? All the udebs are already available, all images build ok (and still fit!), and I have even done partial CD installs using 2.4.24, though never all the way due to the broken CD I constructed with it. I'm not seeing any problems with going ahea

2.4.24

2004-01-17 Thread Joey Hess
I've just nearly successfully installed in vmware using 2.4.24 d-i. The only catch is that the CD image I had it use after booting from floppy does not have the 2.4.24 kernel deb on it and is lacking a few kernel module udebs too. But I see no problems at all that cannot be explained by that