On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 16:28 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 14:21 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Except from the size of the image, I see no issues.
>
> Me neither. I'll give it a few more days for objections to be raised but
> I'm inclined to enable the support after that.
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 14:21 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Ian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 17:00 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> >> On Thursday 07 August 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >> > The patch below, when combined with an update to 2.6.26 (required for
> >> > Xe
Ian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 17:00 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>> On Thursday 07 August 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> > The patch below, when combined with an update to 2.6.26 (required for
>> > Xen's paravirtual framebuffer, I used Otavio's recent patches) allows
>>
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 17:00 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 07 August 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > The patch below, when combined with an update to 2.6.26 (required for
> > Xen's paravirtual framebuffer, I used Otavio's recent patches) allows
> > Xen to be installed using the graphical inter
On Thursday 07 August 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
> The patch below, when combined with an update to 2.6.26 (required for
> Xen's paravirtual framebuffer, I used Otavio's recent patches) allows
> Xen to be installed using the graphical interface when a virtual
> framebuffer is configured for the gues
The patch below, when combined with an update to 2.6.26 (required for
Xen's paravirtual framebuffer, I used Otavio's recent patches) allows
Xen to be installed using the graphical interface when a virtual
framebuffer is configured for the guest.
Are there reasons for the requirement for vesafb rat
6 matches
Mail list logo
