On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 14:21 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Ian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 17:00 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > >> On Thursday 07 August 2008, Ian Campbell wrote: > >> > The patch below, when combined with an update to 2.6.26 (required for > >> > Xen's paravirtual framebuffer, I used Otavio's recent patches) allows > >> > Xen to be installed using the graphical interface when a virtual > >> > framebuffer is configured for the guest. > >> > >> My first question would be whether we really need/want a G-I variant for > >> Xen. > > > > I wasn't intending to to create a second Xen variant, but rather to > > enhance the existing one with the graphical option. (I think you > > realised that but thought I'd make sure) > > I personally like the idea.
Me too ;-) > Except from the size of the image, I see no issues. Me neither. I'll give it a few more days for objections to be raised but I'm inclined to enable the support after that. Ian. -- Ian Campbell My, how you've changed since I've changed.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
