Bug#595783: debian-installer: en_DK locale missing

2010-09-06 Thread era eriksson
Package: debian-installer Severity: normal I have customarily been using en_DK as my default locale because I want my system to speak English to me but units, dates etc to be sane for mainland Europe. Now when I tried to install Debian Testing, I noticed that en_DK is not available as an option d

Bug#245504: Close bug? (was: Dell GX270 installation report)

2004-05-03 Thread era eriksson
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:50:54 +0200, David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The previous mails in this thread seems to suggest that all issues > have got a sufficient answer. Is anyone against closing this report? Nope, go ahead. Just for completeness, I think most of the Gnome problems cou

Bug#245504: Dell GX270, sarge beta3 netinst credit card i386, mostly successful

2004-04-25 Thread era eriksson
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 21:03:03 +0200, Per Olofsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > have you experienced similar problems on other hardware? Yes, the old version of Gnome I had was running on completely another machine (originally a Morse, I think with ATI, then on a Dell GX1 with an ATI card. Oh and b

Bug#245504: Dell GX270, sarge beta3 netinst credit card i386, mostly successful

2004-04-23 Thread era eriksson
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:19:37 +0200, Per Olofsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -- some parts simply don't >> work, and it will crash if you click rapidly in unexpected places etc. > This is a little vague - have you submitted bug reports against GNOME > packages about this? I'm afraid I'm not

Bug#245504: Dell GX270, sarge beta3 netinst credit card i386, mostly successful

2004-04-23 Thread era eriksson
Package: installation-reports Version: +N/A; reported 2004-04-22; d-i beta3 credit card ISO Severity: normal INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: (see above && below) uname -a: Linux toad 2.4.25-1-686-smp #1 SMP Tue Feb 24 12:07:16 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 2004-04-19 Method: Sarge beta3

Bug#159541: acknowledged by developer (closing)

2003-12-04 Thread era eriksson
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 22:35:22 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote: > I am putting this bug report down to user error, since noone else has > ever reported a problem like it with base-config. I think I managed to come up with a hypothesis of what was actually going on there

Bug#178988: anna: list of alternatives longer than screen

2003-01-29 Thread era eriksson
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 16:17:25 -0800, Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> When I get to Load installer modules (fetch from CD), I am presented >> with a listing of 40 entries. This is impossible to view because the >> screen is only 24 lines and each entry takes up at least one line. > For t

Bug#178990: boot-floppies: more(1) or other pager for looking around

2003-01-29 Thread era eriksson
Package: boot-floppies Version: +N/A; reported 2003-01-30 Severity: wishlist (I'm reusing some boilerplate from a bug I just filed against anna. Sorry if I'm boring you. Skip down to ***.) I'm only just acquainting myself with the sarge installer CD which was announced in this week's DWN. Sorry i

Bug#178988: anna: list of alternatives longer than screen

2003-01-29 Thread era eriksson
Package: anna Version: +N/A; reported 2003-01-30 Severity: normal I'm only just acquainting myself with the sarge installer CD which was announced in this week's DWN. Sorry if I'm reporting a bug against the wrong package; I am under the impression that anna is responsible for the actual prompts I

Bug#81118: base: Wishlist: High security base system (or separate add-on package)

2001-01-03 Thread era eriksson
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001 10:58:37 +0100, Michael Bramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 10:15:43AM +0200, era eriksson wrote: >> The stock base system comes with various "traditional security holes" >> enabled. It would be nice (and probab

Bug#81118: base: Wishlist: High security base system (or separate add-on package)

2001-01-03 Thread era eriksson
Package: base Version: 20010103 Severity: wishlist The stock base system comes with various "traditional security holes" enabled. It would be nice (and probably very constructive) to have a brief and simple procedure for how to reconfigure the system so as to run a reasonably tight ship. Off the

Bug#69793: IBM PC Server 320 (MCA/PCI Pentium) cannot boot

2000-09-04 Thread era eriksson
Sorry for taking time to reply -- been on vacation ... On 26 Aug 2000 19:46:42 -0400, Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > era eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The instructions in the installation manual specifically say to >> submit a bug report a

Bug#69197: base: Inadequate backup instructions and tools

2000-08-24 Thread era eriksson
On 23 Aug 2000 16:23:47 -0400, Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > era eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I know how to do that. A naive user who is getting acquainted with >> Unix in general and Debian in particular is probably completely >>

Bug#69793: IBM PC Server 320 (MCA/PCI Pentium) cannot boot

2000-08-24 Thread era eriksson
sg or something, it can be arranged. On 24 Aug 2000 09:04:32 -0400, Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > era eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > I mean, if you can't boot linux you can't boot and there's probably >> > littel we can do. >

Bug#69793: IBM PC Server 320 (MCA/PCI Pentium) cannot boot

2000-08-23 Thread era eriksson
On 23 Aug 2000 22:06:04 -0400, Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > era eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address daf1 > current-> tss.cr3 = 00101000, %cr3 = 00101000 > *pde = > Oops: 000

Bug#69793: IBM PC Server 320 (MCA/PCI Pentium) cannot boot

2000-08-23 Thread era eriksson
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000 09:54:53 -0500, Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 04:45:37PM +0300, era eriksson wrote: > [ snip ] >> Package: boot-floppies >> Version: (potato >> >> architecture: i386 >> model:

Bug#69197: base: Inadequate backup instructions and tools

2000-08-23 Thread era eriksson
On 23 Aug 2000 10:41:53 -0400, Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > era eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On 22 Aug 2000 22:48:17 -0400, Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > I don't understand. The base system is meant to be a

Bug#69793: IBM PC Server 320 (MCA/PCI Pentium) cannot boot

2000-08-23 Thread era eriksson
Package: boot-floppies Version: (potato architecture: i386 model:IBM PC Server 320 memory: 48MB scsi: AIC-7870 cd-rom: ... it just says IBM CDRM0103 or something like that (SCSI #6) network card: (yes; dunno exactly) pcmcia: N/A video:Cirrus Logic GD-54xx

Bug#69197: base: Inadequate backup instructions and tools

2000-08-15 Thread era eriksson
Package: base Version: 2815 Severity: wishlist This should probably be severity: 2 or something like that but due to the nature of this report, I think "wishlist" is the most appropriate. I have a slightly old installation and if this has been fixed in newer releases of Debian, I'll have to