Sorry for taking time to reply -- been on vacation ...
On 26 Aug 2000 19:46:42 -0400, Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> era eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The instructions in the installation manual specifically say to
>> submit a bug report against boot-floppies if you can't manage to
>> get it running.
> Sure. But kernel issues just get redirected to the kernel. I don't
> like confusing users by putting in too much "real-world"
> complexity.
>> I'll gladly try to figure out how to submit a bug report against
>> the installation manual if that's what you're implying. (But as
>> I'm not very intimately familiar with the Debian organization, I
>> bet somebody else could find the exact coordinates for the currect
>> GNATS category much faster than I could ...)
> Ok, well, boot-floppies is the right package to report bugs in the
> install manual.
I think we're in phase error here. Without going back and checking
exactly who said what (I've moved old mail off-line already, checking
is not a big problem but I feel it's not worth the effort, and not the
central thing here anyway), I'm talking about why I was submitting
this to boot-floppies in the first place. You said something I
interpreted as a mild flame for sending this to the wrong place, and
my reply to that is that I was simply following instructions. If
that's still a problem then the instructions are wrong, and I'll
gladly resubmit this as a bug report against those instructions.
Hope this helps clear things up (more than it confuses things further :-)
/* era */
--
Too much to say to fit into this .signature anyway: <http://www.iki.fi/era/>
Fight spam in Europe: <http://www.euro.cauce.org/> * Sign the EU petition
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]