/debian/changelog flash-kernel-3.68/debian/changelog
--- flash-kernel-3.67/debian/changelog 2016-06-20 00:20:31.0 -0600
+++ flash-kernel-3.68/debian/changelog 2016-07-13 09:33:53.714642651 -0600
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+flash-kernel (3.68) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * Add support for gzip-c
Package: partman-efi
Version: 62
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i patch
If you boot an x86/mac in legacy BIOS mode with a pre-existing non-UEFI OS
installed, you will get the following warning:
"This machine's firmware has started the installer in UEFI mode but it looks
like there may be existing opera
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 07:15:32AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Christian PERRIER (2015-01-30):
> > Quoting dann frazier (da...@dannf.org):
> > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 07:01:32AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > > > Unless I'm wrong, the released chan
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 07:01:32AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>
> > Changes:
> > libdebian-installer (0.99) unstable; urgency=medium
> > .
> >* Replace NULL terminator for the arm map_hardware table, accidentally
> > dropped in 0.92 (Closes: #776488).
>
>
> Hello Dann,
hey Chris
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 06:10:49PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> dann frazier (2015-01-28):
> > Package: libdebian-installer4
> > Version: 0.98
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: d-i patch
> >
> > The map_hardware[] table in src/system/subarch-arm-linu
Package: libdebian-installer4
Version: 0.98
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i patch
The map_hardware[] table in src/system/subarch-arm-linux.c is no longer NULL
terminated. I believe this could lead to a segfault on armel/armhf platforms,
resulting in a failed install.
This bug was introduced back in v
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 03:13:33PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 08:43:02AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 11:40 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 09:50:37AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 08:43:02AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 11:40 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 09:50:37AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 16:30 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Ma
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 09:50:37AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 16:30 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:35:18AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 11:54:31AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On
This is a no-op preparatory commit, intended to make it easier to review
future commits. f-k-i.postinst becomes f-k-i.postinst.in, which is now used
to "generate" the former using cat as a placeholder.
---
debian/flash-kernel-installer.postinst| 114 --
debian/flash
Here's a patch series that implements the aforementioned changes for making it
possible to have packages prepend u-boot commands to the boot.scr, and a
special case for managing the kernel cmdline. I'd appreciate reviews, and
any +/-1s for pushing these changes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
Allow packages to drop in files containing U-Boot commands to be executed by a
platform's bootscript before starting the OS. These files should be
dropped in /usr/share/flash-kernel/ubootenv.d. Users can add additional
stubs, or override stubs provided by packages, by adding files to
/etc/flash-ker
/etc/default/flash-kernel is added with a LINUX_KERNEL_CMDLINE variable
that can optional be used in u-boot bootscripts. This command line is
generated using the distribution default (defaults for Debian and Ubuntu
are provided), and will incorporate any user-provided commandline arguments
provided
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:35:18AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 11:54:31AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 14:59 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > hey,
> > > A couple of projects we're working on at work require some
&
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 11:54:31AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 14:59 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > hey,
> > A couple of projects we're working on at work require some
> > tweaking of u-boot settings. These requirements can be summed up by:
> &g
hey,
A couple of projects we're working on at work require some
tweaking of u-boot settings. These requirements can be summed up by:
A) Maintain the console= setting, and ideally all userargs (the
cmdline args after "--") after install. This seems like standard
Debian functionality that
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:15:51AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> dann frazier, le Mon 12 May 2014 18:56:04 -0600, a écrit :
> > I'm working on enabling a platform that I'm told will be using
> > hardware flow control on the serial console. To prepare for this, I'
hey,
I'm working on enabling a platform that I'm told will be using
hardware flow control on the serial console. To prepare for this, I've
put together this patch to detect the crtscts setting on the console,
and set the -h flag for the getty. It works, but I'd appreciate a
review by someone who k
; -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Format: 1.8
> > Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:02:28 -0700
> > Source: netcfg
> > Binary: netcfg netcfg-static
> > Architecture: source amd64
> > Version: 1.114
> > Distribution: unstable
&
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 10:52:38PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In 2010[0,1] support was added to archdetect for guessing the subarch on
> armel platforms by looking at the running kernel versions suffix, this
> was useful because some armel kernel flavours supported multiple boards
> and
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:12:18PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 13:33 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:14:04PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:32 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > On
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:14:04PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:32 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 01:41 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:28 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
> > > > Security updat
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 03:34:51PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 15:18 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On 12.02.2013 02:15, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > One or other of us will then need to merge the squeeze-security
> > > branch
> > > into squeeze and upload -48 in time for
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 03:34:51PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 15:18 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On 12.02.2013 02:15, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > One or other of us will then need to merge the squeeze-security
> > > branch
> > > into squeeze and upload -48 in time for
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 03:41:03AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 16:25 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We're somewhat overdue with the next Squeeze point release (6.0.7) and
> > it'd be good to get it done before the wheezy release, so that we can
> > pull in so
hey Dmitrijs!
I prepared a similar fix for this a couple of weeks ago that has been
in testing at a customer site. Looks like we crossed paths, but our
fixes are very similar. My patch has been working well for my test
case, and I've verified yours does too. However, I've a question on
your patch
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:54:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 09:01 +0900, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Thanks for the upload; the builds seem to be going well. There don't
>
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 11:30 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > ok, given the replies, let's settle on this:
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ok, given the replies, let's settle on this:
>
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side
>
> We still need a press officer for somewhen in the evening to send out the
>
;t know if this is a regression w/ grub-probe or not, but seems
like a good change either way. Please review :)
commit 12acca65e63727fd678494fd1685e77045112b5b
Author: dann frazier
Date: Mon May 7 12:30:10 2012 -0700
Don't abort due to set -e on grub-probe errors
diff --git a/debian/changelog
tags 610377 + patch
thanks
The current code allows you to boot from a logical volume, but only if
/boot is on the / filesystem. This change permits having /boot on its own
logical volume.
Signed-off-by: dann frazier
---
lib/auto-lvm.sh |8 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 12:29:58PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 29.02.2012 17:20, dann frazier wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:20:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >>Feel free to go ahead with the kernel upload, so we can get it
> >>chucked at
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:20:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 27.02.2012 01:12, dann frazier wrote:
> >Ok - sounds like no DSA, but maybe an upload via o-p-u. My vote is to
> >do no kernel upload if the release gets scheduled for the first
> >weekend in march - tha
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:12:11PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 08:44:46PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Assuming the technical side still works, I do worry a little that a new
> > DSA three weeks after the announced EOL for security support might
> > confuse pe
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 01:35:28PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 02:39:05AM -0700, Edwin Kwan wrote:
> > Hi Guido,
> >
> > Your package tested out OK. I only have an Indy. So I only tried
> > "tip22".
> Thanks for testing! I've uploaded a new version to unstable.
>
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 06:59:35AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> > Debian installer build overview
> > ---
> >
> > Failed or old builds:
> >
> > * FAILED BUILD: hppa May 19 06:00 didaily@c3700 build_c
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:20:35AM +0100, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> On Sunday 10 April 2011 19:54:28 dann frazier wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > The ia64 cdrom flavor is missing the pata_cmd64x driver, which is needed to
> > access the optical drive on various mode
Note that ia64 also suffers from this artificial restriction because
the elilo.efi bootloader does not read files from the /boot directory.
Rather, these files are read from a separate disk partition - the EFI
partition - that is not mounted by the OS by default. The EFI
partition is updated by a k
n_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
commit 0c87c0d120f32c863e8ee63cf37c61241f759a13
Author: dann frazier
Date: Sun Apr 10 12:42:53 2011 -0600
Add pata-modules to cdrom config for ia64.
diff --git a/build/pkg-lists/cdrom/ia64.cfg b/build/pkg-lists/cdrom/ia64.cfg
index 084a0a7..672ba26 100644
--- a
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 05:32:49PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting dann frazier (da...@dannf.org):
>
> > > And how about hppa builds?
> > >
> > > IIRC, hppa is now only supported in unstable, so that may explain why
> > > D-I daily builds ar
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 08:51:08AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> > Debian installer build overview
> > ---
> >
> > Failed or old builds:
> >
> > * FAILED BUILD: armel Mar 03 23:16 joey@box build_orion
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 04:12:26PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 06:14:16PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > [ Sorry to those that receive this mail twice. I messed up the
> > recipient list the first time. ]
> >
> > Hi Dann
> >
> >
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 06:14:16PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> [ Sorry to those that receive this mail twice. I messed up the
> recipient list the first time. ]
>
> Hi Dann
>
> Excerpts from Andreas Barth's message of Mit Nov 10 22:51:05 +0100 2010:
> > * d
In order to get the kernel/d-i stack squared away for 5.0.7, I'd like
to go ahead and upload 2.6.26-26 tomorrow. I had planned to push the
changes in the lenny branch via security (w/ several other queued
security fixes), but I'll need a little more time to get the security
upload ready.
Let me kn
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:26:45PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Hi
>
> Since June there are no more daily builds for hppa. As I just found
> out the buildd building these images (lafayette) is dead. Are there any
> plans to setup the daily builds on another buildd?
>
> See http://lists.debian
hey,
If you live in europe and are interested in a J5600 for parisc-linux
development or testing, please contact me off-list with a blurb about
what you would plan to do with it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
hey,
I'd like to update d-i for 5.0.5 as it includes a new nic driver
(be2net), and fixes several boot issues. I plan to prepare an upload
of linux-kernel-di-* and d-i once the latest kernel upload has been
built everywhere. Are there any additional changes that should go in?
--
dann fr
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 03:50:18AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 25 February 2010, dann frazier wrote:
> > fyi, I'm planning to upload a new set of linux-kernel-di packages for
> > the upcoming etch point release, mainly to fix a regression on s390
> > (#562525)
fyi, I'm planning to upload a new set of linux-kernel-di packages for
the upcoming etch point release, mainly to fix a regression on s390
(#562525).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arch
or future uploads.
I'm currently uploading refreshed linux-kernel-di packages built against
2.6.26-21. Once accepted, I can go ahead and refresh d-i. Please let me
know if there's any other pending d-i changes for stable that I should
wait for.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
ntainers, despite
> sending several mails. Please retry on a different buildd than ball.
mayr had the same failure. The buildd admin is looking at it, but
we're not sure what the problem is. Do you have a guess as to what is
causing it?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-b
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 03:52:26PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> As all packages needed to build D-I were now available, I have uploaded for
> both stable and oldstable. An accept is not needed; apparently D-I gets an
> automatic accept due to by-hand processing of the image tarballs.
>
> For oldsta
em in the archive.
>
> After that I will upload debian-installer for both stable and oldstable.
>
> Cheers,
> FJP
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
p-u still needs an update, so I wouldn't bother there. The bits in
o-p-u are candidates for the next oldstable release, though I believe
they add no additional hardware support. Feel free to resync them
though.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debia
3 exists and is used to boot the kernel. Any
> other ideas?
Does this system use the aacraid driver? If so, please try testing the
kernel from lenny-proposed-updates (2.6.26-19).
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
synopsis.
>
>
> Then I launched "taslsel --test" and did choose the "dannf" task.
>
> r...@mykerinos:/etc/whereami# tasksel --test
> debconf-apt-progress -- aptitude -q -y install hello
>
> So, it seems that things are OK as of now...
Thanks Christi
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 03:18:53PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Hello dann,
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 4:04 PM, dann frazier wrote:
> >> The bnx2x driver was disabled in lenny due to its use of non-free
> >> firmware. I have p
add
the firmware-bnx2x package
- Update kernel-wedge/stable to include bnx2x if available (are there
space issues here?)
- Update d-i in 5.0.3 to incorporate this driver
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&quo
Here's some draft text:
The debian installer has been rebuilt to use the updated kernel
packages
in 5.0.2. This resolves issues with:
- installation on s390 G5 systems
- installation on IBM summit-based i386 systems
The installer also includes an updated cdebconf package with resolves
several i
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 11:19:59AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> dann frazier wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 08:25:00PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> >> Hi there,
> >>
> >> we intend to do a Lenny Point Release on Saturday, June 20th. We will
> >>
fix for it however it needs a full
> d-i update to happen. If RM team is OK with it I can take a look at it
> and prepare the packages during this week.
If d-i does respin, it would be cool if we could include an updated
lkdi-s390, which would make the fix for #511334 available at install
tim
t; Except for the C3 and the Geodes, all of them were released in the last
> Millenium and the successors will be available for at least 10 years at
> the release of Squeeze.
I actively use a VIA C3 (no-cmov) for a number of services, so would
prefer not to lose that support.
--
dann f
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 04:47:35PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> hey,
> The first lenny update is scheduled for early April, so I wanted to
> start coordinating the kernel update.
>
> Security
>
> The lenny-security branch is currently caught up on security iss
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 07:06:20AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting dann frazier (da...@debian.org):
> > hey,
> > I wanted to give -release & -boot a heads up that the kernel team is
> > looking to do a linux-2.6 upload to sid tomorrow. As discussed on the
>
hey've been successfully tried and tested in several different kernel
> builds and on different HW.
> Thanks.
Yep!
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
itz's recent
bug triage
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 01:54:20PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> The Debian-CD Team has prepared a testing set of images[1] of RC1 for us
> to give it a try. If all goes well we should release Debian Installer
> RC1 in Monday.
>
>
x itself with next images.
>
> Cheers,
> FJP
Indeed it did, thanks Frans!
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
base-installer/initramfs-tools/driver-policy doesn't exist
Aug 25 23:14:35 main-menu[1006]: (process:506): + return 10
Aug 25 23:14:35 main-menu[1006]: INFO: Menu item 'bootstrap-base' succeeded but
requested to be left unconfigured.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:58:38AM +0200, J?r?my Bobbio wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 06:03:34PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > I wonder if there's a way to split the cancel checking and the
> > progress checking? [???]
>
> It might be, but I am not inclined to do
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:42:59AM +0200, J?r?my Bobbio wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:47:59AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > When doing an LVM+crypto install, I am presented with a "Erasing data"
> > screen with a Cancel button. It doesn't seem to be p
Package: partman-crypto
Version: 33
Severity: normal
When doing an LVM+crypto install, I am presented with a "Erasing data"
screen with a Cancel button. It doesn't seem to be possible to use the cancel
button - it is not highlighted, and pressing tab doesn't cause it to be.
-- System Information:
http://free.linux.hp.com/~dannf/bugs/492899/no-can-cancel.png
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 04:24:20PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Attached you'll find the current draft for the announcement of
> "etch-and-a-half". Please review it; current schedule for it to be send
> out is tomorrow.
>
> I'll make the most up to date version available at
y 6
with no sse flag. However, I don't follow why this means a 686 kernel
would not be safe on a family 6 cpu.
[1]
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.2/gcc/i386-and-x86_002d64-Options.html#i386-and-x86_002d64-Options
[2] http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=5119933&postcount=32
--
dann
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 09:06:01AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 12:14:14PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 11:56:06PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > Beta 2 of d-i will be using 2.6.24[1], the current version of which
> >
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 12:14:14PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 11:56:06PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > Beta 2 of d-i will be using 2.6.24[1], the current version of which
> > is missing a couple of stable updates (including a handful of security
> &
ckports. Let me know if any
other changes are necessary.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2008/05/msg00062.html
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hey Peter!
I've been asking around for access to an rx2200 to debug this, but I'm
told that no such model exists :) Can you doublecheck and/or provide a
full boot log? It should print the model number out when ACPI is
initialized.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
at the "etchnhalf netinst" could even
> be used in combination with Etch CD/DVD sets from previous (point)
> releases.
Let me try and reiterate some points of your proposal to make sure I
understand. The only install media for etchnhalf will be netinst
cds. These cds will be
y what should be included on them [3].
> (Hell, the whole "Etch + Lenny D-I" concept hasn't even really been OKed.)
> Because of mirror space issues _and_ because of required preparations on
> the debian-cd side this _really_ needs to be discussed with Sledge
> urge
2.6.24 on hardware supported
by 2.6.22, and then the follow-on beta would add support for the
remaining hardware (that supported by 2.6.24 but not 2.6.22). Unless
someone sees a problem with this, it seems fine to me.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &qu
tches for kernel-wedge for it and
>hope to get it ready for tomorrow or so.
Awesome.
Is there anything special we need to add to deal with etch 1/2
kernel metapackages? We were talking about using a name like
linux-image-2.6-686-etchnhalf.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 09:43:15AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> imo, the best and more widly solution would be the 2. That shouldn't
> >> be too hard and would allow us to reduce the memory footprint not only
&g
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 07:15:01PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yeah. Options here would be:
> > 1) big hammer - write a modprobe wrapper that cleans
> > unused/unloadable modules after every load
> > 2)
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 05:09:38PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > [1] Of course, acpiphp has module dependencies, and if these aren't
> > cleaned up after a failed load, memory will still be lost to those
> >
(Good discussion so far, sorry for the late response..)
On Sunday 09 December 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 07 December 2007, dann frazier wrote:
> > Understood. Note that this implementation doesn't *require* the
> > module, it just takes advantage of it if its availabl
ctures it should be possible to modify the default boot
> parameters on the images so that the 'suite=etch' option is included by
> default (with 'suite?=etch' the user would even still be prompted at lower
> priorities).
Which would solve the complexity issue I see w/ 3)
> The disadvantages listed for 3) do _not_ apply to CD images as they are
> self-contained and thus are not affected by changes in the Lenny archive.
Thanks a lot for the analysis.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 01:34:25AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 December 2007, dann frazier wrote:
> > This patch to hw-detect adds slot information, if available, to the
> > network device name. Its not uncommon for HP (or our customers) to
> > have systems with
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 05:03:41PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Currently this patch only attempts to load the acpiphp driver - it
> > should probably try and load others as well (e.g. pciehp & shchp, and
>
exported in sysfs
+
+ -- dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:02:24 -0700
+
hw-detect (1.58) unstable; urgency=low
* Install acpi-support-base, needed now to get power button shutdowns to
Index: hw-detect/sysfs-upd
-1,3 +1,11 @@
+rootskel (1.58) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Create more serial device files in the ramdisk before calling
+busybox init, in case they are needed for a serial console.
+Closes: #453749.
+
+ -- dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:25:03 -0700
+
rootskel
Thanks for your responses. As I was writing this report, I began to
wonder why exactly the proc trick doesn't work on some ia64 configs -
I'm investigating this now. If I can find a workable solution there,
we may be able to forego these changes - if not, I'll regenerate new
patches based on your c
: Use serial-console-info tool if /proc console
+detection is being stubborn.
+
+ -- dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:32:24 -0700
+
finish-install (2.13) unstable; urgency=low
* 90console: avoid duplication of values on /etc/securetty.
Index: finish-install/
d
[2] an rx1600 w/ an MP for one
[3] https://launchpad.net/bugs/48752
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or so.
No ABI change is planned, so a d-i respin shouldn't be necessary - but
I'll leave it up to the d-i team to make that call.
I should also point out that sarge has a number of issues piling up as
well, but it would save a lot of effort to do it after 3.1r6 *hint* :)
--
dann f
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 01:51:59PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 05:36:20PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 07:14:06PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > > Would someone please post irc logs for those of us who can't make that
&
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 02:04:28AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 03 November 2007, dann frazier wrote:
> > Here's an updated patch that implements Joey's suggestion of extending
> > mirror/udeb/suite to support multiple suites. Again I've omitted the
> >
from multiple places, anna's current behavior is to use
+the last one, not necessarily the one with the greatest version.
+
+ -- dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:41:47 -0600
+
net-retriever (1.18) unstable; urgency=low
* Use /etc/udebs-source as t
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 05:36:20PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 07:14:06PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > Would someone please post irc logs for those of us who can't make that date?
>
> Yes, we will.
Here ya go:
http://meetbot.debian.net/me
1 - 100 of 230 matches
Mail list logo
