Re: Etch netinstaller has no eth0 in qemu

2007-03-05 Thread Uwe Dippel
Here I get $ md5sum debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso 07b6034367c171526c4fbcdf0851162c debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso 166703104 Byte, downloaded with wget Funny, though, that it runs properly for all the rest of the install. I went through until the network was to be configured. I'll try anoth

Re: Etch netinstaller has no eth0 in qemu

2007-03-04 Thread Uwe Dippel
Although such a hostile message deserves no reply, I point out for others who may not know it that [1]upstream of the arch-latest directory one finds exactly the structure described above. It's been that way for years, as I used it to follow Sarge development. My excuses if you read this as ho

Re: Etch netinstaller has no eth0 in qemu

2007-03-04 Thread Uwe Dippel
On 3/4/07, Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll try another download. Which takes around one day in MY ... . No, sorry, I'll never get it, ever. This is just silly: while I am downloading you guys upload the latest version, and then wget switches the length.

Re: Etch netinstaller has no eth0 in qemu

2007-03-04 Thread Uwe Dippel
On 3/4/07, Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I I'll try another download. Which takes around one day in MY ... . Just for curiosity, I used the real(== from CDROM) Sarge-netinstaller of years ago. It goes through smoothly. Now I think to stick with it, install it,

Re: Etch netinstaller has no eth0 in qemu

2007-03-03 Thread Uwe Dippel
I checked the md5 and compared it with the website. It is different. Here I get $ md5sum debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso 07b6034367c171526c4fbcdf0851162c debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso 166703104 Byte, downloaded with wget Funny, though, that it runs properly for all the rest of the install. I w

Re: Etch netinstaller has no eth0 in qemu

2007-03-03 Thread Uwe Dippel
.working netinstaller. Uwe On 3/4/07, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sunday 04 March 2007 02:35, Uwe Dippel wrote: > debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso (20070303) does not 'see' the eth0 > offered by qemu. I have checked with dmesg | grep eth0, it is empty. It > is no

Etch netinstaller has no eth0 in qemu

2007-03-03 Thread Uwe Dippel
Subject says it: debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso (20070303) does not 'see' the eth0 offered by qemu. I have checked with dmesg | grep eth0, it is empty. It is no qemu problem, since in all other images I use: KNOPPIX, DSL, ... eth0, comes up properly. On the .iso as well as on the ensuing 'hard di

Bug#257234: about your Debian installation report

2004-10-15 Thread Uwe Dippel
Joey Hess wrote: I suspect that most or all of the problems you reported are fixed in the latest version of the installer, but we currently lack the manpower to check every installation report. Sorry, can't help you. I didn't try any new install after that Beta 4 on a D400. Since a part of the pr

Bug#257302: Install on DELL Latitude D400 - some X problems

2004-07-02 Thread Uwe Dippel
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: Beta 4 uname -a: linux debian 2.4.25-1-386 #2 wed Apr 14 19:38 Date: 02-07-2004 Method: CDROM - network install Machine: DELL Latitude D400 Processor: Memory: Root Device: /dev/hda Root Size/partition table: Output of lspci: Base System Insta

Bug#257236: Grub will not find other OSs on the disk

2004-07-01 Thread Uwe Dippel
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: Beta 4 uname -a: linux debian 2.4.25-1-386 #2 wed Apr 14 19:38 Date: 02-07-2004 Method: CDROM - network install Machine: DELL Latitude D400 Processor: Memory: Root Device: /dev/hda Root Size/partition table: fdisk: /dev/discs/disc0/part11

Bug#257234: Install on DELL Latitude D400 - some minor annoyances

2004-07-01 Thread Uwe Dippel
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: Beta 4 uname -a: linux debian 2.4.25-1-386 #2 wed Apr 14 19:38 Date: 02-07-2004 Method: CDROM - network install Machine: DELL Latitude D400 Processor: Memory: Root Device: /dev/hda Root Size/partition table: Output of lspci: Base System Insta

Bug#257113: Install on DELL Latitude D400 fails due to Partit ioning

2004-07-01 Thread Uwe Dippel
My excuses, my fault. Strangely enough, neither XP nor OpenBSD were affected by my stupid mistake: fdisk: /dev/discs/disc0/part11 7 Dell Utilitiy 28 900 HPFS/NTFS ^^^ 3 891 1581 OpenBSD

Bug#257113: Install on DELL Latitude D400 fails due to Partitioning

2004-07-01 Thread Uwe Dippel
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: Beta 4 uname -a: linux debian 2.4.25-1-386 #2 wed Apr 14 19:38 Date: 01-07-2004 Method: CDROM - network install Machine: DELL Latitude D400 Processor: Memory: Root Device: /dev/hda Root Size/partition table: Output of lspci: Base System Insta

Re: Installation-reports

2003-11-25 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 02:58, Joey Hess wrote: > That narrows it down to either the end of hw-detect (starting pcmcia?) > or whatever comes just after. Try booting with DEBCONF_DEBUG=5 (but not > with DEBCONF_PRIORITY), and switch over to the 4th virtual console > (alt-f4) right before it's going t

Re: Installation-reports

2003-11-20 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 01:43, Joey Hess wrote: > One of the modules it is loading must be hanging the kernel. Try booting > with DEBCONF_PRIORITY=low DEBCONF_DEBUG=5. Okay, funnily enough, I get more menus. For example keyboard and then keyboard layout. Never get these without the two parameters.

Re: Installation-reports

2003-11-19 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 01:26, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > try ps, ps aux, ps ef. > try to kill the blocking prog. ?? Completely frozen; all terminals. The only moment to switch / check is when the input for the language is required. After this one 'enter' it's doomed. I tried Scroll Lock, but to

Installation-reports

2003-11-19 Thread Uwe Dippel
Debian-installer-version: Beta 1 - Website - 09-11-2003 Date: 19-11-2003 Method: from CDROM; with cdrom debug aic7xxx=no_probe video=vga16:off apm=off noapic Machine: Inspiron 8100; BIOS A15 Processor: PIII-866 Memory: 256 MB Output of lspci: not available on Installer With RH7.3 /

Re: Install-report

2003-11-18 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 08:50, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Can you select some nic-extra-modules*.udeb package to be installed or > are all the net modules allready poulled in? ??? No understand. Booting that Beta-1 to linux or cdrom freezes completely two seconds later, whichever parameters I p

Re: Install-report

2003-11-16 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 05:33, Joey Hess wrote: > To pick one problem, I cannot help you with whatever problem the > installer had with using your network device unless you say what that > device is. 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82815 815 Chipset Host Bridge and Memory Controller Hub (rev 04)

Install-report

2003-11-15 Thread Uwe Dippel
Debian-installer-version: 09-11-2003 uname -a: ?? Date: 12-11-2003 Method: CDROM Machine: DELL Inspiron 8100 Processor: 686 (P 866) Memory: 256MB Root Device: [none] Root Size/partition table: [none] Output of lspci: Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure netwo

Network card driver not found - bf24

2003-09-01 Thread Uwe Dippel
A minor hitch: While installing 3.0rc1 as default (Enter) on a DELL Inspiron 8100, the NIC-module (3c59x.o) is found and installed automatically. With bf24, it isn't. It requires manual intervention (and knowledge about the module) to install. I doubt a 2.4-kernel issue, because RedHat 7.3 install

bf24 install freezes on DELL Inspiron 8100

2003-09-01 Thread Uwe Dippel
Tried an install of 3.0rc1 from CDROM. At certain moments of base install everything simply freezes completely. Rebooted about a dozen times, but never got through. (Hard power reset necessary in all cases.) To kind of exclude hardware error, I installed the default (Enter = 2.2.20), and it went w