On Monday 12 January 2009 06:48:19 Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Noel David Torres Taño (env...@rolamasao.org):
> > with CC and Replay-to to debian-l10n-span...@lists.debian.org
> > no need to reply directly to me
> >
> > Dear debian-boot team:
> >
> >
with CC and Replay-to to debian-l10n-span...@lists.debian.org
no need to reply directly to me
Dear debian-boot team:
I've tried to translate (into spanish) debootstrap 1.0.10 and I've found that
there is a PO file but there is no POT file. Is this intentional?
Many thanks
Noel Torres
er Envite
On Saturday 03 January 2009 16:47:49 Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Noel David Torres Taño (env...@rolamasao.org):
>
> > Well, I was doing a graphical default install when I saw it
>
> Could you re-check ?
>
> That template is supposedly displayed at medium priority
On Friday 09 January 2009 10:10:37 Philip Hands wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:44:43AM +0100, Noel David Torres Ta??o wrote:
> > Package: debian-installer
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> >
> > debian-installer for Lenny should have a desktop selector if the "Desktop"
> > task is chosen, or sep
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Sometimes even if you are not doing an LVM or RAID installation one wants a
separate /boot partition. Guided partitioner does not allow that, only "all
together", "separate /home" or "separate
/home, /usr, /var and /tmp", but there is not a "separat
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
debian-installer for Lenny should have a desktop selector if the "Desktop" task
is chosen, or separate tasks for at least KDE and Gnome, and better if for XFCE
as well.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (
On Saturday 03 January 2009 16:47:49 Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Noel David Torres Taño (env...@rolamasao.org):
>
> > Well, I was doing a graphical default install when I saw it
>
> Could you re-check ?
>
> That template is supposedly displayed at medium priority
On Saturday 03 January 2009 07:48:11 Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org):
>
> > It precisely inverts the meaning of the sentence, claiming that a generic
> > initrd has an advantage of *not* being usable on arbitrary hardware. I
> > don't think that will be misle
On Saturday 03 January 2009 00:30:29 Fernando Cerezal wrote:
> He is right, it would be better "Detectando los discos y todos los
> demás dispositivos". However, the phrase is correct in content and
> form.
That's even a better translation than my own. I think I've read too many
documentation in
On Friday 02 January 2009 21:27:29 Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 08:11:06PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Quoting Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org):
>
> > > > > The emphasized "no" word must be deleted.
>
> > > > Spanish l10n team, confirmation ?
>
> > > Confirmed, the '
Package: debian-installer
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n
In the "udev configuration" step, the sentence reads:
Un initrd genérico es más grande que uno dirigido y puede incluso ser tan
grande que algunos cargadores de arranque
no pueden cargarlo, sin embargo tiene la ventaja de que NO [emphasis min
Package: debian-installer
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n
Spanish string "Detectando discos y todo el demás hardware" is not 'spanish in
good law'. Should be "Detectando discos y el resto del hardwre".
It a very visible string since it is a non-skipable step: Detecting disks and
all other hardware
Wouldn't it be better if explained somewhere in the package itself?
BTW, I humbly think that downloading the .deb as stated in
http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/i386/apds03.html.en is worse than
downloading the .tar.gz from the same place and where to download it is not
stated, just linked
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.10
Severity: wishlist
Example in the man page does not explain how to create a Debian chroot on
another system. It starts supossing that debootstrap is installed, but IMHO it
should start explaining how to download and
install it in a non-Debian system, since
14 matches
Mail list logo
