> In my opinion it's very good when backports is default in sources.list.
>My opinion is that I don't want to push ticking time bombs into the
>hands of our users. And that's exactly what defaulting to enabling
>backports was.
You pointed out that apt will happily install a package from backport
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 06:35:52 +0200, Christian PERRIER
wrote:
> Quoting micah anderson (mi...@riseup.net):
> >
> > So, back in 2009 this bug was opened and it seems to have been stalled,
> > partly because people thought that XTS was not mainstream enough, but
> >
So, back in 2009 this bug was opened and it seems to have been stalled,
partly because people thought that XTS was not mainstream enough, but
its 2011 now and a lot of people use it.
I agree with the "don't hide things from the user and don't double the
key without telling them" sentiments that
Yann Dirson schrieb am Wednesday, den 05. March 2003:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:06:06PM -0800, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html is generated based on the regular
> > lintian reports at http://lintian.debian.org/. Listed on this page are
> >
4 matches
Mail list logo
