Bug#1099057: discover: After modernizing sources.list, Discover (KDE) settings will not see the repositories

Control: reassign -1 plasma-discover 6.3.0-1 Control: retitle 1 plasma-discover: After modernizing sources.list, Discover (KDE) settings will not see the repositories On Thu Feb 27, 2025 at 6:45 PM CET, Are Mehus wrote: > Package: discover > Version: 2.1.2-10.1 > > After modernizing my sources wi

Bug#1095302: Installation on Thinkpad P1Gen7

Bit late to the party, but I may have something useful to say ... On Fri Feb 7, 2025 at 3:08 PM CET, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 09:42:04AM +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote: >> The kernel driver tried and failed to load 93 first and sent an error >> message even though it success

Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4

On Mon Jan 13, 2025 at 9:12 PM CET, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > On 13/01/2025 at 14:28, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > On Mon Jan 13, 2025 at 9:36 AM CET, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > >> > >> AFAIK the only implementation of Petitboot on arm64 (Odroid) supports > >> ext

Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4

On Mon Jan 13, 2025 at 9:36 AM CET, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > On 13/01/2025 at 07:48, Holger Wansing wrote: > > Am 12. Januar 2025 23:44:27 MEZ schrieb Pascal Hambourg > > : > >> Indeed we must make a trade-off > >> between robustness (ext4 vs ext2), convenience (/boot in root filesystem > >> vs

Bug#1092809: USB hard drive not found on Banana Pi BPI-M1

On Sat Jan 11, 2025 at 10:11 PM CET, Andreas Barth wrote: > Package: installation-reports > > Boot method: sdcard > Image version: trixie > Date: 2024-12-27 (download date) > > Machine: Banana Pi BPI-M1 > Processor: armhf ARM Cortex-A7 > > Base System Installation Checklist: > [O] = OK, [E] = Error

Bug#1088225: debian-installer: automatic partitioning does not allow for hibernation

changes aren't available in Stable. > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 12:50 PM Diederik de Haas > wrote: > > > > On Tue Nov 26, 2024 at 7:32 PM CET, allan wrote: > > > I'm afraid not - I downloaded it from debian.org's homepage this morning.. > > > > Plea

Bug#1088225: debian-installer: automatic partitioning does not allow for hibernation

On Tue Nov 26, 2024 at 7:32 PM CET, allan wrote: > I'm afraid not - I downloaded it from debian.org's homepage this morning.. Please give the full URL to what you downloaded instead of letting other people *guess* what you DL-ed. > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 12:28 PM Holger Wansing wrote: > > allan

Bug#1078871: installer: reserve first 16 MiB space in default recipes for ARM devices?

Hi, On Fri Nov 8, 2024 at 9:11 PM CET, Holger Wansing wrote: > "Diederik de Haas" wrote (Sat, 19 Oct 2024 16:54:51 > +0200): > > IOW: It was so, so close from working ... but it needs the 'boot' flag. > > This should now be fixed in the daily images, so

Bug#1078871: installer: reserve first 16 MiB space in default recipes for ARM devices?

Hi, On Thu Oct 24, 2024 at 9:08 PM CEST, Holger Wansing wrote: > "Diederik de Haas" wrote (Sun, 20 Oct 2024 16:28:41 > +0200): > > The 'cs21' device is a (different) Rock64 (rk3328): > > > > And now the partition stuff: > > > > ``` >

Bug#1078871: installer: reserve first 16 MiB space in default recipes for ARM devices?

On Mon Oct 21, 2024 at 5:16 PM CEST, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > On 21/10/2024 at 10:26, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > On Sun Oct 20, 2024 at 8:49 PM CEST, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > >> On 20/10/2024 at 16:28, Diederik de Haas wrote: > >>> > >>> ``` >

Bug#1078871: installer: reserve first 16 MiB space in default recipes for ARM devices?

On Sun Oct 20, 2024 at 8:49 PM CEST, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > On 20/10/2024 at 16:28, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > > > AFAIUI, UEFI requires GPT, but GPT does not require UEFI. > > No, UEFI does not require GPT, at least not on my amd64 machines > (including QEMU+OVMF).

Bug#1078871: installer: reserve first 16 MiB space in default recipes for ARM devices?

Hi, On Sun Oct 20, 2024 at 2:24 AM CEST, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Quoting Diederik de Haas (2024-10-19 21:08:37) > > I never create a separate /boot partition, which has several advantages > > IMO. But the ARM ecosystem is ... let's say ... diverse. > >

Bug#1078871: installer: reserve first 16 MiB space in default recipes for ARM devices?

On Sun Oct 20, 2024 at 12:34 AM CEST, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > On 19/10/2024 at 23:58, Holger Wansing wrote: > > > > This Rockchip system uses the legacy msdos partition table, right? (No UEFI, > > thus no GPT). > > With this partition table it should be possible and is confirmed to be > > working

Bug#1078871: installer: reserve first 16 MiB space in default recipes for ARM devices?

Hi Pascal, On Sat Oct 19, 2024 at 8:37 PM CEST, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > First, thank you for the detailed test report ! You're welcome. > On 19/10/2024 at 16:54, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > On Sat Oct 19, 2024 at 1:40 PM CEST, Holger Wansing wrote: > >> > >&g

Re: New partition sizes in default recipes for d-i

On Mon Sep 16, 2024 at 7:49 AM CEST, Holger Wansing wrote: > I thought I go for some testing then, but sadly the mechanism > to build mini.iso's from d-i commits seems broken for some > time. > > Phil: are you aware of this? > > I looks like an issue with the naming/versioning of linux-image, > but

Re: Bug#1079175: python3-pkg-resources: pkg_resources cannot be imported: No module named 'packaging'

On Tue Aug 20, 2024 at 11:45 PM CEST, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Emanuele Rocca (2024-08-20): > > Package: python3-pkg-resources > > Version: 72.2.0-1 > > Severity: serious > > > > Importing pkg_resources fails with the following error: > > > > (sid-amd64-sbuild)ema@ariel:~$ python3 > > Python 3

Bug#1078871: some backlog from #1076952 (installer: reserve first 16 MiB space in default recipes for ARM devices?)

ow-ups: > > > Pascal Hambourg wrote: > > On 16/08/2024 at 00:27, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > > On Thu Aug 15, 2024 at 10:24 PM CEST, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > > >> Then I guess a 16 MiB unused partition could be added to relevant > > >> recipes. Now,

Bug#1076952: [RFD] partman-auto: Update guided partitioning size limits for current and future needs

On Fri Aug 16, 2024 at 8:39 AM CEST, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > On 16/08/2024 at 00:27, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > On Thu Aug 15, 2024 at 10:24 PM CEST, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > >> Then I guess a 16 MiB unused partition could be added to relevant > >> recipes. Now, whi

Bug#1076952: [RFD] partman-auto: Update guided partitioning size limits for current and future needs

On Thu Aug 15, 2024 at 10:24 PM CEST, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > Then I guess a 16 MiB unused partition could be added to relevant > recipes. Now, which are the relevant recipes ? In other words, which > arch/subarch need it ? > Currently, partman-auto has the following recipes for ARM: > > recipes-a

Bug#1076952: [RFD] partman-auto: Update guided partitioning size limits for current and future needs

On Thu Aug 15, 2024 at 5:50 PM CEST, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > On 15/08/2024 at 16:25, Diederik de Haas wrote: > >> I do not know any way to reserve unallocated space in recipes. The > >> recipes could create a 16-MiB unused partition but the table in [2] > >> lis

Bug#1076952: [RFD] partman-auto: Update guided partitioning size limits for current and future needs

On Thu Aug 15, 2024 at 3:46 PM CEST, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > On 15/08/2024 at 08:26, Holger Wansing wrote: > > Am 15. August 2024 00:47:22 MESZ schrieb Diederik de Haas > > : > >> > >> I'm not 100% sure if this fits into this subject/discussion, but .

Bug#1076952: [RFD] partman-auto: Update guided partitioning size limits for current and future needs

On Thu Aug 15, 2024 at 8:26 AM CEST, Holger Wansing wrote: > Am 15. August 2024 00:47:22 MESZ schrieb Diederik de Haas > : > >On ARM devices it would be very useful if the first 16MB would be > >(automatically) reserved. > >The U-Boot bootloader is normally put in th

Bug#1076952: [RFD] partman-auto: Update guided partitioning size limits for current and future needs

On Fri Aug 9, 2024 at 10:08 PM CEST, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > Guided partitioning with LVM already provides a feature to reserve space > in the VG. Maybe it could be extended to guided partitioning with plain > partitions. I'm not 100% sure if this fits into this subject/discussion, but ... On AR

Bug#1076952: [RFD] partman-auto: Update guided partitioning size limits for current and future needs

On Wednesday, 7 August 2024 20:33:02 CEST Holger Wansing wrote: > > > Could probably solve the long standing issue > > > "#987503 swap partition only 1 GB instead of at least 1 x RAM size" > > > stating that hibernation is broken for machines with RAM bigger than > > > 1G... > > > > Do you mean to

Bug#972396: Comment on «initramfs-tools: Installation fails (no space left on device)»

On Wednesday, 31 July 2024 16:37:48 CEST Pascal Hambourg wrote: > On 31/07/2024 at 00:38, Thomas Hahn wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 14:00:51 +0200 Pascal Hambourg > > > > wrote: > > > firmware-nvidia-graphics was installed on systems which already had > > > firmware-misc-nonfree because firmware

Re: Merge request for increasing ESP size

Hi, On Thursday, 25 July 2024 20:38:48 CEST Holger Wansing wrote: > just to let you know: > I have created a merge request to increase the size of ESP similar to what > has been done for /boot (in git) shortly: > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/partman-auto/-/merge_requests/14 > > Note: >

Bug#1076617: installation-guide: Severely outdated information wrt partitioning

On Thursday, 25 July 2024 20:50:23 CEST Holger Wansing wrote: > Diederik de Haas wrote (Tue, 23 Jul 2024 22:14:46 > +0200): > > > > >Or as I phrased it in https://bugs.debian.org/1076582#27 : > > > > >"Maybe that document should be updated for this CENTU

Bug#1076617: installation-guide: Severely outdated information wrt partitioning

Hi, On Tuesday, 23 July 2024 20:34:25 CEST Holger Wansing wrote: > > Am 19. Juli 2024 20:54:24 MESZ schrieb Diederik de Haas : > > >In bug #1076582 it was pointed out that the documentation at > > >https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/apcs05.en.html > >

Bug#1076617: installation-guide: Severely outdated information wrt partitioning

Agreed. > So, before changing the doc, we should first evaluate, if the default size > should be increased. > > Thoughts? For my thoughts, I'll just quote what I said in the submission: On vrijdag 19 juli 2024 20:54:24 CEST Diederik de Haas wrote: > For ``/boot`` size it should m

Bug#1076617: installation-guide: Severely outdated information wrt partitioning

Source: installation-guide Version: 20230623 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 In bug #1076582 it was pointed out that the documentation at https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/apcs05.en.html has the following line: "create a small (25–50MB should suffice)

Bug#1075713: linux: D-I's X fails to start under kvm -vga qxl

On Thursday, 4 July 2024 13:19:59 CEST Cyril Brulebois wrote: > It just seems to me that, at least with qemu packages currently found in > Debian 12, earlier versions of the installer (based on 6.8.y) didn't > need that particular module to get X up and running, while newer > versions of the instal

Re: Contacting Debian Boot team

On Monday, 24 June 2024 10:18:26 CEST Andreas Tille wrote: > Am Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 09:29:18AM +0200 schrieb Emanuele Rocca: > > Trixie runs fine on it, though there are some rough edges. Full details > > on https://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn/Thinkpad/X13s > > Two things somehow would pre

Bug#1064617: update password selection advice

On Tuesday, 19 March 2024 12:08:53 CET Holger Wansing wrote: > Apparently we have reached something like a consensus on this topic, > should we merge this then? > > > > Any objections? LGTM :-) possibly `s/rms/debra/` with

Re: Bug#1055016: override: tasksel-data:admin/optional

On Sunday, 29 October 2023 12:54:13 CET Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Daniel Lewart (2023-10-29): > > Package: ftp.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: override > > X-Debbugs-Cc: task...@packages.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org, > > 855...@

Bug#1064617: Passwords should not be changed frequently

On Friday, 8 March 2024 19:58:56 CET Philip Hands wrote: > IMO Having the 'password/passphrase' throughout makes it awkward to > read, and actually we've got one place where it still just says > password, and fixing that would make it slightly worse IMO. > > How about dropping the passphrase stuff

Bug#1064617: Passwords should not be changed frequently

On Wednesday, 6 March 2024 13:19:04 CET Justin B Rye wrote: > Maybe instead of saying "use the system's initial user account to > become root" it should say "allow the system's initial user account > to gain administrative privileges"? I'm not sure. Oh, and we might > even want to mention the wor

Bug#1064617: Passwords should not be changed frequently

On Tuesday, 5 March 2024 19:28:25 CET Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Philip Hands (2024-03-05): > > Cool, in that case I'll fix those two things and then use the result > > for the MR[1], and if the openQA test runs look OK, will merge that. > > Only skimmed over it, but that looks sensible, thanks all

Bug#1064617: Passwords should not be changed frequently

On Monday, 4 March 2024 22:30:57 CET Holger Wansing wrote: > > https://wiki.debian.org/Passwords doesn't exist (yet), but it's an easy to > > remember URL and we'd have all the space we need to give proper advise? > > Would need to check if that fits in the relevant screens (I want to avoid > havi

Bug#1064617: Passwords should not be changed frequently

On Monday, 4 March 2024 10:43:59 CET Holger Wansing wrote: > >Regarding the password advice, I ended up concluding that it's pretty > >unlikely that anything we say at this point will have any effect on > >people's behaviour, but then I'm probably just an old cynic. Also, I > >failed when trying to

Bug#1064617: Passwords should not be changed frequently

On Saturday, 2 March 2024 21:07:34 CET Philip Hands wrote: > I don't actually care very much whether we encourage sudo use. A person who I consider very knowledgeable deliberately went for sudo and disabled the root account for security reasons. It was an image provided by him that I ended up nu

Bug#1064617: Passwords should not be changed frequently

Hi, On Friday, 1 March 2024 20:46:49 CET Holger Wansing wrote: > Philip Hands wrote (Fri, 01 Mar 2024 06:46:27 +0100): > > If you want to make a constructive contribution, how about suggesting a > > wording that reflects the advice that you think would be most useful to > > the people that actual

Bug#1064617: Passwords should not be changed frequently

Hi Philip, On Friday, 1 March 2024 06:46:27 CET Philip Hands wrote: > Having helped people to install Linux for ~30 years, I'd say that it's > the norm for people to be almost incapable of coming up with a decent > password if they were not expecting the question. I fully agree that most people u

Bug#1064617: Passwords should not be changed frequently

On Thursday, 29 February 2024 23:13:55 CET Holger Wansing wrote: > > in which I'm recommending setting no password for root, which then gives > > the initial user 'sudo' membership[1]. > > What about the "Allow login as root?" question (only shown in expert mode), > which is asked directly before

Bug#1058806: HP EliteBook 860 G9 (4C148AV)

On Saturday, 16 December 2023 22:16:32 CET Pascal Hambourg wrote: > According to /usr/share/misc/pci.ids, this device has PCI ID 8086:51f0 > which is listed in bookworm's iwlwifi module aliases. > Can you post the output of the following commands after booting with > kernel 6.1 ? Could it be the i

Bug#1056697: 12.2 Installation Report, Complete Failure of Network

On Saturday, 25 November 2023 08:37:09 CET Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hard to tell without any logs. The output of `lsmod` and `dmesg` from both Ubuntu and Debian may also help to figure out why it's working in one but not the other. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message pa

Bug#1035477: installation-reports: grub or kernel of D-I image hangs on Thinkpad X13s after "EFI stub: Exiting boot services..."

On Wednesday, 11 October 2023 20:05:43 CEST Emanuele Rocca wrote: > To triple-check that the needed module is in there: > > zstdcat /initrd.img | cpio -itv | grep qnoc-sc8280xp.ko ICYDK: there's also an `lsinitramfs` command signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#1043226: debian-installer: Please consider moving root user setup to expert install, or change text

On Monday, 7 August 2023 18:25:07 CEST Jonathan Carter wrote: > Source: debian-installer > Version: 20230607+deb12u1 > > Firstly, the instructions start off with "You need to set a password for > 'root'", followed by seemingly uninteresting text about what a good password > should be, which makes

Re: Default network configuration system (was Re: proposal: dhcpcd-base as standard DHCP client starting with Trixie)

On Tuesday, 20 June 2023 13:11:14 CEST Diederik de Haas wrote: > The 'old world' Please ignore me. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Default network configuration system (was Re: proposal: dhcpcd-base as standard DHCP client starting with Trixie)

On Tuesday, 20 June 2023 11:19:08 CEST Lukas Maerdian wrote: > IMHO ifupdown{2,-ng} is the "old world" The 'old world' and 'not of this time (anymore)' are the absolute worst arguments against something, typically used when no substantive arguments can be made. > potentially in combination with

Re: Bug#1029843: Missing symlinks for RPi 4 (to brcmfmac43455-sdio.raspberrypi,4-model-b.txt)

On Monday, 8 May 2023 14:08:14 CEST James Addison wrote: > On Mon, 1 May 2023 11:18:03 +0100, James Addison wrote: > > > Diederik de Haas (2023-04-30): > > > > And that's exactly what happens or will happen. Even though the RPi4 > > > > filename doesn&#

Bug#1035569: installation-reports: failed to detect Realtek RTL8852BE WiFi 6 802.11ax PCIe adapter

On Friday, 5 May 2023 17:45:34 CEST Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Today I attempted to install Debian bookworm on a brand new Lenovo > IdeaPad 5 14IAL7 with an i5-1235U CPU, 16GB RAM and 512GB SDD. > > The installation failed to proceed at the network card detection > stage. Apparently, the machine ha

Re: Bug#1029843: brcmfmac: requested firmware filename inconsistent with linux-firmware.git on non-devicetree systems

Control: block -1 1035505 On Thursday, 4 May 2023 01:41:12 CEST Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Diederik de Haas (2023-05-04): > > And that makes it a firmware-brcm80211 issue and now it all does make > > sense as it now all does tie together :-) > > Great, that's what it l

Re: Bug#1035392: Bug#1029843: live-boot: Devices Requiring Firmware: multiple requested files in single line overlapping / special characters

On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 17:18:42 CEST James Addison wrote: > The system's dmesg includes this line: > > DMI: Raspberry Pi Foundation Raspberry Pi 400/Raspberry Pi 400, BIOS > UEFI Firmware v1.34 1 2/16/2022 > > As Cyril said though.. this can't (shouldn't) be genuine DMI. So > what's going on

Re: Bug#1029843: live-boot: Devices Requiring Firmware: multiple requested files in single line overlapping / special characters

On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 03:41:05 CEST James Addison wrote: > I think that the vendor name is coming from a DMI fallback: > > https://sources.debian.org/src/linux/6.1.25-1/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/ > brcm80211/brcmfmac/common.c/?hl=487#L487 > > Whether the model name is from DMI or from the

Re: RFC: android-style boot image support for flash-kernel

On Sunday, 30 April 2023 23:28:23 CEST Roger Shimizu wrote: > Currently, the dev-board is supported by Linaro [2][3], and most > kernel device-tree, patches and firmware are already upstreamed. > I confirmed that with simple snippet below, generated boot.img can be > used to boot the RB3 / DB845c d

Re: Bug#1029843: live-boot: Devices Requiring Firmware: multiple requested files in single line overlapping / special characters

On Sunday, 30 April 2023 20:25:50 CEST James Addison wrote: > Do we _need_ to retain the vendor name and model name in the firmware > filename? > > My guess (without being too familiar with the firmware loading process yet) > is that it'd be easier to ship a concisely-named file that omit the vend

Re: netboot's kernel version does not match linux-image-amd64

On Tuesday, 25 April 2023 18:09:59 CEST Emanuele Rocca wrote: > On 2023-04-25 06:02, Roland Clobus wrote: > > On 25/04/2023 17:38, ign...@tuta.io wrote: > > > Package: debian-installer-12-netboot-amd64 > > > Version: 20230217 > > > > That's an old image. For Bookworm (Debian 12) the kernel is curr

Bug#1033985: debian-installer: Installer sets grub up without existing Windows boot choice

On Wednesday, 5 April 2023 22:04:57 CEST Cyril Brulebois wrote: > you should be able to activate os-prober via some configuration > file under /etc (probably /etc/default/grub). Correct, the setting is GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=false /me wonders why that default changed ... signature.asc Descriptio

Bug#987503: swap partition only 1 GB instead of at least 1 x RAM size

On Saturday, 25 February 2023 08:46:21 CET Bastian Bittorf wrote: > There was an argument by steve: > "waste hundreds of gigabytes on swap space." > > => If a computer has "hundreds of gigabytes" of RAM > (and so swap), you do not care - you have enough resources anyway. The use-case which was th

Re: Bug#1031289: linux: Missing sound drivers (and speakup) in d-i on arm64

On Monday, 20 February 2023 01:07:29 CET Samuel Thibault wrote: > Diederik de Haas, le lun. 20 févr. 2023 00:38:28 +0100, a ecrit: > > On Monday, 20 February 2023 00:27:57 CET Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Diederik de Haas, le lun. 20 févr. 2023 00:14:19 +0100, a ecrit: >

Re: Bug#1031289: linux: Missing sound drivers (and speakup) in d-i on arm64

Control: tag -1 -moreinfo On Monday, 20 February 2023 00:38:28 CET Diederik de Haas wrote: > On Monday, 20 February 2023 00:27:57 CET Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Diederik de Haas, le lun. 20 févr. 2023 00:14:19 +0100, a ecrit: > > > On Tuesday, 14 February 2023 18:10:11 CET Sam

Re: Bug#1031289: linux: Missing sound drivers (and speakup) in d-i on arm64

On Monday, 20 February 2023 00:27:57 CET Samuel Thibault wrote: > Diederik de Haas, le lun. 20 févr. 2023 00:14:19 +0100, a ecrit: > > On Tuesday, 14 February 2023 18:10:11 CET Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Some people on debian-accessibility wanted to install debian in arm64 &

Re: Bug#1031289: linux: Missing sound drivers (and speakup) in d-i on arm64

Control: tag -1 +moreinfo On Tuesday, 14 February 2023 18:10:11 CET Samuel Thibault wrote: > Some people on debian-accessibility wanted to install debian in arm64 > under the utm wrapped qemu on Macos. The current installation images > however do not include sound drivers and speakup. Currently w

Re: Bug#1029543: hw-detect: clarify use cases about searching for firmware packages on external media

On Wednesday, 25 January 2023 23:01:01 CET Diederik de Haas wrote: > This sounds like a nice solution for the SD card images. > I myself always use a wired connection, but I saw yesterday that someone > tried to use d-i for RockPro64 but didn't get any output on screen and then >

Re: Bug#1029543: hw-detect: clarify use cases about searching for firmware packages on external media

On Wednesday, 25 January 2023 20:22:33 CET Cyril Brulebois wrote: > # SD card images (might also be applicable to the upcoming ChromeOS images) > ... > All of this assuming that the end results can be appended as the third > part of the + + combination! This sounds like a nice solution for the

Bug#1027692: installation-reports: successful with some wifi and encrypted /boot difficulties

On Monday, 2 January 2023 07:03:10 CET Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Also wifi related, on first boot, there was no wifi device configured, > and I did not happen to install anything that pulled in > network-manager or something similar. I am not sure I even did an > install using wifi before, so this

Bug#1025892: Installation at Ryzen 7000 not fully successfully

On Sunday, 11 December 2022 14:16:04 CET Bernhard wrote: > igc :04:00.0 eno1: PCIe link lost, device now detached https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221031170535.77be0...@kernel.org/ looks relevant signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#1009014: installation-reports: Successful install on Pine64 Rock64 using serial console

On Thursday, 14 April 2022 18:56:40 CET Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > I should see if it works via HDMI sometime... > > HDMI support required tracking down two modules already enabled in the > linux kernel but not present in the udebs used by debian-installer. This > should be fixed in the next lin

Re: Bug#1022900: grub-install, efibootmgr etc. not working with new kernel

Control: found -1 6.0.5-1 On Friday, 28 October 2022 23:09:00 CEST Stephan Verbücheln wrote: > I have now compiled and booted vanilla kernel 6.0.5. “efibootmgr -o” is > not working. > > I double-checked that with kernel 5.19.11 (Debian), it is working fine. Thanks for testing and reporting back.

Bug#678694: preseed_fetch fails with relative url

Hi Josch, On Friday, 13 May 2022 13:02:51 CEST Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > You probably already saw Phils reply to #1010878 but if anybody else is > reading this I also wanted to quickly record what I did to avoid the > problem. It appears that Phil send it to you directly (and not

Bug#1010878: installation-reports: preseeding passwords doesn't work on mips64el under qemu

On Friday, 13 May 2022 09:35:49 CEST Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > If I understand the docs of preseed_fetch correctly, then this should fetch > the setup-testbed script from a path relative to where it got the preseed > file from. > > Unfortunately this results in the following: > > M

Re: ifupdown/dhcp

On Sunday, 8 May 2022 21:34:39 CEST Michael Tokarev wrote: > What's up with ISC dhclient? "ISC DHCP Client and Relay End of Maintenance" @ https://www.isc.org/blogs/dhcp-client-relay-eom/ Couple of quotes: "ISC plans to end maintenance of the ISC DHCP client and relay by the end of Q1, 2022."

Bug#1009670: installation-reports: Mostly working installation on rockpro64

On Thursday, 14 April 2022 05:02:26 CEST Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2022-04-13, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > I will admit I used a tained image that added a couple modules for > > HDMI output on another platform (rock64); I'll check without the extra > > modules and report back if they're needed

Bug#999567: busybox: CVE-2021-42373 through CVE-2021-42386 (fixed in 1.34)

Control: tag -1 pending On 12 Nov 2021 16:54:06 +0100 Diederik de Haas wrote: > Package: busybox > Version: 1:1.30.1-7+b1 > Severity: important > Tags: security upstream fixed-upstream The new upstream version fixing these CVEs (and others) have been ready in salsa for several mon

Bug#1003973: Should we pull in fwupd by default for most systems?

On Tuesday, 18 January 2022 20:13:14 CET Steve McIntyre wrote: > At the moment, fwupd will only be installed by default on systems > installed to use a Gnome desktop (checked for Buster, Bullseye and > Sid). On Gnome, yes, but not other DE or systems where no DE is installed: $ apt-cache rdepends

Bug#881626: busybox: enable telnetd

On Tuesday, 18 January 2022 01:17:38 CET Jonathan Rubenstein wrote: > Maybe this is an indication that busybox-static needs to be audited, or > that all 3 configurations should be audited to make sure something isn't > missing that has no reason to be. IIUC, that is planned: https://bugs.debian.o

Bug#877953: busybox: FTBFS on hurd-any and kfreebsd-any

Hi James, On Sat, 7 Oct 2017 22:41:41 +0100 James Clarke wrote: > Forwarded: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2017-October/ 085870.html > > Currently busybox FTBFS on the Hurd and GNU/kFreeBSD. I have submitted > the above patch series upstream to fix this. Of the 7 patches you submit

Bug#896902: Bug #896902 in busybox marked as pending

Control: tag -1 -pending On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 08:36:41 + Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > Control: tag -1 pending > > Bug #896902 in busybox reported by you has been fixed in the > Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit > message below, and you can check the diff of the f

Bug#985674: Fixed upstream in 1.33.1 and 1.34.0

Control: tag -1 fix-upstream The mentioned commit is fixed in upstream version 1.33.1 and 1.34.0. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#999567: busybox: CVE-2021-42373 through CVE-2021-42386 (fixed in 1.34)

Package: busybox Version: 1:1.30.1-7+b1 Severity: important Tags: security upstream fixed-upstream X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/busybox already shows them. I learned it through https:

Bug#998803: busybox: Debian’s busybox’ tr violates POSIX

On Sun, 07 Nov 2021 23:25:11 +0100 Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Package: busybox > Version: 1:1.30.1-7+b1 > > Unlike mandated by POSIX: > https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/tr.html > > busybox' tr in Debian doesn't seem to understand any of the character > classes,.

Bug#971946: Unlinking bug with MR

Control: notforwarded -1

Bug#971946: Linking bug with MR

Control: tag -1 patch Control: forwarded -1 https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/libdebian-installer/-/merge_requests/2 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#928603: libdebian-installer - parser_rfc822: remove limitation on line length

On Tue, 7 May 2019 12:07:31 + Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen wrote: > Package: libdebian-installer > Severity: wishlist > > As debated in #55 and #904699, the READSIZE limit is arbitrary, > parser_rfc822 should be rewritten to remove READSIZE, so that it > does't have to be increased again. +1

Bug#971946: libdebian-installer: READSIZE size insufficient for cdebootstrap to build sid/unstable from buster/stable environment

Control: severity -1 grave On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 14:57:28 +0400 Jonathan Stanley wrote: > Package: libdebian-installer > Version: 0.119 > > When using cdebootstrap from within buster/stable to create a rootfs for > sid/unstable, it will fail with: > > W: parser_rfc822: Iek! Don't find end of val

Same issue as already reported, and partially fixed

Control: severity -1 serious Hi, This is the same issue as https://bugs.debian.org/904699, which is actually an issue in libdebian-installer (https://bugs.debian.org/55). The fix has actually been made. But the problem is that it needs an unblock ack from the d-i team (https://bugs.debian.

Bug#554444: Rebuild for cdebootstrap-static?

Thanks for upping the limit in libdebian-installer :) But doesn't it require a rebuild for cdebootstrap-static to pick up this change? If so, could you do or request it? TIA, Diederik signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#554444: Ping?

I just tried to install a Buster system with cdebootstrap(-static) and that fails because this bug is not fixed. According to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=904699#15, increasing READSIZE from 16384 to 65536 'fixes' it. I agree that 65536 is also just a random number, but so l

Bug#831513: installation-reports: Install on Asus ZenBook UX305CA largely successful (with a workaround)

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Tags: d-i -- Package-specific info: Boot method: usb stick Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/stretch_di_alpha7/amd64/iso-cd/debian-stretch-DI-alpha7-amd64-netinst.iso retrieved on 2016-07-15 Date: 2016-07-15 05:22 Machine: Asus Z

Bug#694068: Still present with debian-stretch-DI-alpha7-amd64-netinst.iso

I bumped into this issue when I recently installed Debian on my new laptop. I only installed the "Standard system utilities", thus no network-manager and while wpasupplicant was installed the wireless connection config I used during installation wasn't written to a/the wpa_supplicant.conf file a

Re: Bug#771208: unblock: busybox/1:1.22.0-14

On Thursday 11 December 2014 08:52:05 Ivo De Decker wrote: > > > #768876 is tagged jessie-ignore so I'm really unconvinced by the > > > debian/rules changes. > > > > It is jessie-ignore just to be non-RC. The fun with static linking > > and bugs it discovered shows that proper Built-Using field is

Bug#768876: Wrong bug number fixed?

Bug nr 768926 is filed against qemu-user-static, and was supposedly fixed with busybox version 1.22.0-10 My guess is that that upload was supposed to fix bug nr 768876 and not 768926 -- GPG: 0x138E41915C7EFED6 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#769190: busybox-static: DNS resolver is broken again with the last upload

Package: busybox-static Version: 1:1.22.0-11 Severity: important This is basically the same error as with bug #757941, but it was reassigned to glibc and fixed there. As Aurelien Jarno correctly stated in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757941#120 it was indeed fixed with version

Bug#757941: busybox-static: DNS resolver stopped working in busybox-static version 1.22.0-7

On Sunday 21 September 2014 17:34:24 Michael Tokarev wrote: > This _is_ a glibc problem, and it can be trivially demonstrated by writing > a tiny program that calls, say, getaddrinfo() on its argument. When built > statically it always returns NOTFOUND, without any attempt to load any > nss module

Bug#757941: busybox-static: DNS resolver stopped working in busybox-static version 1.22.0-7

On Tuesday 12 August 2014 21:46:43 Michael Tokarev wrote: > Nope. This is getaddrinfo() function. So it is glibc, not gcc or > optimization. > > getaddrinfo() does not work in jessie glibc when linked statically. > It immediately returns "Name or service not known" (rc=-2) without > trying to re

Bug#757941: busybox-static: DNS resolver stopped working in busybox-static version 1.22.0-7

On Tuesday 12 August 2014 21:16:06 Michael Tokarev wrote: > Also, it is specific to amd64 arch, it does not > happen on i386 (from 2 variants of x86 arches). It's not just limited to amd64, since I encountered the issue on raspbian for the Raspberry Pi, which is somewhere between armel and armhf

Bug#757941: busybox-static: DNS resolver stopped working in busybox-static version 1.22.0-7

Package: busybox-static Version: 1:1.22.0-8 Severity: important When trying to ping an address, like debian.org, with busybox-static you get a "ping: bad address 'debian.org'" error. I knew that version 1.22.0-6 of busybox-static was working, so I also downloaded version 1.22.0-7 and 1.22.0-8 and

Bug#678694: Also reported on Launchpad

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/preseed/+bug/909139 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201206232126.40925.didi.deb...@cknow.org

Bug#678694: preseed_fetch fails with relative url

Package: preseed Severity: normal Tags: d-i Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? Trying to install Debian Wheezy in a VirtualBox image using preseeding and trying to use the following line: d-i preseed/la

Bug#637808: installation-report: Graphical Installer doesn't work properly

> If someone has a virtual machine system handy, trying to locate when the > problem appeared would be nice, e.g. using the dailies. Images downloaded through http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/ Tested with VirtualBox 4.1 on a Debian sid install on amd64. I've used the testing bu

  1   2   >