I cannot give an answer, since I've not used lilo since grub became the
default.
If nobody on the lilo-installer team can answer this question by taking
a quick look into his/her test setup, then it may be time to send the
code to the attic?
Regards, David
On 2014-03-17 00:01, Cyril Brulebo
Xavier Poinsard wrote:
cdimage.debian.org isn't responding.
Is it overloaded or down ?
Down. The hardware died earlier today.
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2005/01/msg00022.html for details
Regards, David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 10:03:14PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 10:29:37AM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> > Package: installation-reports
> > INSTALL REPORT
>
> > Machine: Dell Precision 370
>
> > hwclock: can be solved by generou
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
Debian GNU/Linux testing "Sarge" - Official Snapshot i386 Binary-1 (20041213)
uname -a: Linux cl2 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Thu Nov 25 04:24:08 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Thu Dec 16 10:12:00 CET 2004
Method: netinst iso, standard ins
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 10:57:07AM +0200, xerces8 wrote:
> 2.) GNOME <-> X dependency
>
> The gnome desktop package ( under "Tasks" in aptitude ) has
> no dependency on xserver. Why ? Because it could be used on
> a remote display ?
Yes.
> 2.a) xserver-common not dependent on XXX
>
> XXX being
Dear list members!
Please take a look at my proposal to increase robustness of the initial
lilo.conf.
Summary: Add two additional, optional images, containing the appropriate "initrd="
lines for a standard install. This would ensure, that all make-kpkg
installed kernels would be bootable without
least load the modules as "vendor
modules" while installing.
Thank you for your time and work.
Regards, David Schmitt
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux zid 2.4.18-686 #2 Wed Mar 20 20:21:31 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_AT
--
T
7 matches
Mail list logo
