Bug#227684: Installation report

2004-01-14 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
aller was not frozen, but I no longer could abort shutdown. I stopped here and went to bed. Overall, looks very good even though there are lots of minor problems. -- Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Debian developer http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: busybox in main

2000-10-21 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
definitely *cannot* be decided by the install system team alone. (Which is, BTW, a point I already made those months ago in my reject message.) -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%% -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: busybox in main

2000-10-18 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
was my position then, and it is my position now, that this point needs to be discussed in -policy (preferably resulting in an accepted Policy amendment) before such packages can go in main. -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%% -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: &mdash in boot-floppies/documentation

2000-10-01 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On 2929T233002+0400, Michael Sobolev wrote: > On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 05:20:11PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > > In HTML, there is no portable way to represent an em-dash - except by > > using a plain old "-". > You mean two of them, do you not? :)

Re: &mdash in boot-floppies/documentation

2000-09-29 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
ance is not guaranteed. 151's meaning depends on the charset. In latin-1 it appears to be undefined (ie. dragons be there). In HTML, there is no portable way to represent an em-dash - except by using a plain old "-". -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.i

Re: non-installable binaries in main (was Re: busybox_0.45-1_i386.changes REJECTED)

2000-07-02 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
ad assumed to be useless. -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%% -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: busybox_0.45-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2000-07-01 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
est on the installer, and as such leaves out many people who might have an opinion on this matter. So, it's useless trying to convince me here (unless you can convince me that the issue does not exist). -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%% -- To UNS

Re: busybox_0.45-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2000-07-01 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
of a binary package. Why does it *have* to be a .deb? (And yes, a source deb would probably be less intrusive.) -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%% -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: busybox_0.45-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2000-07-01 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
or someone else from -boot initiated this discussion so that the list gets a clean propsal that can be discussed.) -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%% -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: busybox_0.45-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2000-07-01 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
386/modules/ makes sense, or something like that. > woody/main/binary-i386/installer/ may be easier to set up, but is a bit > less clean. Indeed, this is a good idea. But it still needs to be discussed (and not on -boot, it is about the installer, not the distribution). -- %%% Antti-J