On 20000927T162201-0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: > I'll look into this. The HTML translation map in debiandoc-sgml maps &mdash to >&mdash > which according to the HTML/XHTML book of O'Reilly doesn't exist. Probably we need >to > use — but conformance is not guaranteed. 151's meaning depends on the charset. In latin-1 it appears to be undefined (ie. dragons be there). In HTML, there is no portable way to represent an em-dash - except by using a plain old "-". -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%% -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- &mdash in boot-floppies/documentation Van Buggenhaut
- Re: &mdash in boot-floppies/documentation Michael Sobolev
- Re: &mdash in boot-floppies/documentation Van Buggenhaut
- Re: &mdash in boot-floppies/documentat... Michael Sobolev
- Re: &mdash in boot-floppies/docume... Adam Di Carlo
- Re: &mdash in boot-floppies/do... Michael Sobolev
- Re: &mdash in boot-floppi... Ardo van Rangelrooij
- Re: &mdash in boot-fl... Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
- Re: &mdash in boo... Michael Sobolev
- Re: &mdash in boo... Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
- Re: &mdash in boot-fl... Michael Sobolev
- Re: &mdash in boo... Van Buggenhaut
- Re: &mdash in boo... Adam Di Carlo
- Re: &mdash in boo... Michael Sobolev
- Re: &mdash in boo... Van Buggenhaut
- Re: &mdash in boo... Adam Di Carlo
- Re: &mdash in boo... Michael Sobolev
- Re: &mdash in boo... Adam Di Carlo