[d-i daily 040605] Potentially misleading DHCP retry screen

text: "If you answer 'No', you will be prompted to configure the network manually." Best regards Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[d-i daily 040605] Partman offers already assigned mountpoints

I seek feedback first. If people agree I'd be happy to submit a formal bug report for this. Cheers Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [d-i daily 040528] Unallowed mount points in root directory

Just to reply to my own email: This is apparently fixed in discover1 1.5-10 which hasn't hit Sarge yet (Sarge currently has 1.5-9). Cheers Andree On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 17:49, Andree Leidenfrost wrote: > On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 00:00, Joey Hess wrote: > > Andree Leidenfrost wro

Re: [d-i daily 040528] Issue with OS detection

g works as expected. I have even reinstalled win98 just to make sure. Cheers Andree On Mon, 2004-05-31 at 00:04, Andree Leidenfrost wrote: > On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 22:28, Joey Hess wrote: > > Andree Leidenfrost wrote: > > > Was the w2k partition NTFS or FAT32? > > >

Re: [d-i daily 040528] Issue with OS detection

On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 22:28, Joey Hess wrote: > Andree Leidenfrost wrote: > > Was the w2k partition NTFS or FAT32? > > > > Mine is a FAT32 win98 partition. Partman mounts this just fine. If I do > > this, however, the described problem occurs. > > This was a ntfs

Bug#251662: os-prober does not detect mounted partitions

rd daily i386 iso image, 28 May 04. > > Cheers > Andree > > On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 00:01, Joey Hess wrote: > > Andree Leidenfrost wrote: > > > Mounting an existing windows installation (FAT32) in partman causes OS > > > detection to fail, windows is not found

Re: [d-i daily 040528] Unallowed mount points in root directory

On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 00:00, Joey Hess wrote: > Andree Leidenfrost wrote: > > When installing from i386 daily standard image 045028 I end up with two > > directories /cdrom0 and /cdrom1. I believe this is in violation of FSH > > 2.3. The same mount points also exist in /medi

Re: [d-i daily 040528] Issue with OS detection

On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 13:18, Joey Hess wrote: > Andree Leidenfrost wrote: > > What else do you need to know apart from: > > > > > This is with the standard daily i386 iso image, 28 May 04. > > You're right, I must have missed that. Which is more than underst

Re: [d-i daily 040528] Issue with OS detection

What else do you need to know apart from: > This is with the standard daily i386 iso image, 28 May 04. Cheers Andree On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 00:01, Joey Hess wrote: > Andree Leidenfrost wrote: > > Mounting an existing windows installation (FAT32) in partman causes OS > >

[d-i daily 040528] Issue with OS detection

reproduce this behaviour consistently. This is with the standard daily i386 iso image, 28 May 04. I consider this to be a bug. If you agree, I'd be happy to file a bug report if someone could let me know what package to file it against. Cheers Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Aus

[d-i daily 040528] Unallowed mount points in root directory

this already been reported as a bug? If not, it would be great if someone could tell me what package would create these directories so that I can file a bug. Is that discover1? Cheers Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#240415: i386: Success, some issues

called or similar. Having more things configurable via debian-installer boot parameters would be great. Expert mode is certainly cool, but often one only needs one single feature that the otherwise slick standard installer doesn't have. Best regards Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia

Bug#231083: Additional Info for mandb Issue

> > I suggest you try to shorten the length of that extended description > > by about 3 lines. > > Aha, thanks! I thought from Andree's description of the problem that the > extended description had disappeared entirely. > > Done in man-db 2.4.2-8. -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

d-i installer beta 2: Suggestion for fewer screens (apt-installation)

ote also that this was measured via cable modem. However, as it is _time_ based, I would assume it to be pretty much the same for analog modem. Best regards Andree PS: Please, cc me in replies as I'm not currently on the list. -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

d-i beta 2: Wrong time for clock set to UTC

the RTC is set to UTC whereas the second assumes it's set to local time. Best regards Andree PS: Please cc me in replies as I'm not currently subscribed to the list. -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsub

d-i beta 2: issue with hostname

ver the number in the hostname as I have also tried 'aurich' which went fine and 'sydney1' which failed again. Best regards Andree PS: I can provide a screenshot if necessary. PPS: I'm not currrently on the list, please cc me when replying. -- Andree Leidenfrost S

Bug#231083: Additional Info for mandb Issue

Hi Colin Just thought I send a screenshot to demonstrate what I'm talking about. Hope it's appropriate to do this against #231083. I can file a new bug against mandb if this is of any help. Cheers Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia <>

Bug#231083: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#231083: installation-reports: sarge i386 beta2, success but severe glitches)

are detection (all) _/evaluate DHCP outcome: If DHCP worked, i.e.: - IP address assigned - netmask known - gateway known - name servers known - domain known Do 5) Partitioning ElseIf DHCP completely failed 5) Ask whether to try again (existing screen) Else DHCP worked but not everything provided 5) Inform user, e.g.: The network configuration via DHCP was only partly successful. You will now be asked to provide the missing information. If unsure, ask your network administrator. 6) Ask for first missing bit ... EndIf ... Best regards & thanks a lot again Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#231077: Disreard, please consider #231083 instead

I'm sorry, sorry, sorry. I seem to have hit a wrong key in evolution and off it went. Please close this bug. The real report is in #231083. Regards Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Bug#231083: installation-reports: sarge i386 beta2, success but severe glitches

hing - had to speciify the paper size twice and so forth... Bottom line: Debian is truely great (tried RedHat, Mandrake, Suse) - but still only for the initiated - not read for the average desktop user :-( -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#231077: installation-reports:

[ ] Reboot: [ ] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]