The image was sarge i386 netinst daily, 28 May 2004. Also, for the record: The partition (FAT32) with the windows installation (win98) was mounted with partman, NOT manually.
Regards Andree On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 12:34, Christian Perrier wrote: > Package: os-prober > Severity: normal > > This was reported in -boot. > > It seems that, though #247080 is supposed to have been fixed, it is not > currently. > > So, opening another bug....this will be tested soon. > > BTW, joey was asking whether you used a sarge_d-i or sid_d-i version of the > installer. Which doesn't really matter anyway as the #247080 bug is supposed > to have been fixed a while ago and should be fixed in both. Obviously it is > not. > > I re-paste the mail exchanges.... > > <scratches his head> What else do you need to know apart from: > > > This is with the standard daily i386 iso image, 28 May 04. > > Cheers > Andree > > On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 00:01, Joey Hess wrote: > > Andree Leidenfrost wrote: > > > Mounting an existing windows installation (FAT32) in partman causes OS > > > detection to fail, windows is not found. If I don't assign a mount point > > > to the windows partition in partman, OS detection works as expected and > > > windows is bootbale from GRUB. I've tried this multiple times and can > > > reproduce this behaviour consistently. > > > > > > This is with the standard daily i386 iso image, 28 May 04. > > > > > > I consider this to be a bug. If you agree, I'd be happy to file a bug > > > report if someone could let me know what package to file it against. > > > > See bug #247080. It is thought have been fixed weeks ago, but you did > > not mention what version of d-i you used. -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
