e!
Please also feel free to follow up you severity bump with a
justification pointing out which specific policy paragraph you're
refering to.
Hope this helps. Please also remember that my views are mine and might
not neccessarily reflect the official pkg-gnome standpoint.
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
e caused by their local build environment
setup containing alot crazier things than the above.
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
PS. As previously mentioned reproducible builds has already been set up
to help catch issues so I don't understand the urgency, see:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/deb
of them before upload if possible though.)
Btw, seems like except from Christian Perrier none of the Uploaders
are active. Should I wipe out their names while at it? Maybe some
others would accept being added instead, like Karsten Merker and
possibly also Vagrant Cascadian?
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
that the user can fix
up the template without having to read flash-kernel code like
I had to do to figure it out.
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
>From b86a051ee0a0c748d30eb455f39b5005ae6c29aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Henriksson
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 17:34:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] W
)
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500,
'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architectur
ng them short and to the point previously so I trust you'll
do an excellent job here as well, but if you want help with suggestions
please mention it and a non-native speaker like myself would make an
attempt.
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 03:54:00PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Please consider unblocking package util-linux
It contains many bugfixes cherry-picked from the master branch, not very
exciting stuff, fixes CVE-2
unteer to add the
dependency in util-linux which is essential. We should likely also
document in the release notes that installing usrmerge as a pre-upgrade
step would be recommended.)
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
ues please tell me and I'd be happy
to help out. Hoping to see us move forward on this very soon!
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
unately on IRC) and that bug report is oldest lets continue this
discussion there. If we come to the conclusion we want d-i to be
involved, we should simply reassign (or whatever is appropriate)
then
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
Source: console-setup
Version: 1.123
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
[...]
$ sudo aptitude purge console-setup console-setup-linux
The following packages will be REMOVED:
console-setup{p} console-setup-linux{p}
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 15 not upgraded.
Need to
Hello.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 02:39:16PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andreas Henriksson (2015-09-29):
> > Fwiw, See also discussion with libthai maintainer about potentially
> > providing an udeb in the future in https://bugs.debian.org/800369
>
> To be
Hello!
Fwiw, See also discussion with libthai maintainer about potentially
providing an udeb in the future in https://bugs.debian.org/800369
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
ld staticly, but can anyone forsee any actual practical or
policy issue with doing so?)
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
a permanent strategical move. Just the most
convenient and suitable one at the moment to avoid stalling progress.
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
PS. I'm currently on vacation. Any real action from my side is not very
likely to actually happen until sometime closer to debconf.
--
To UNSUBSCRI
a bad idea, the ncurses maintainer has already
agreed to add the needed udeb but only if actually needed. We're
still very early in the development window after all.)
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
to switch from slang to ncurses.
Does this pose a problem for the installer? If I don't hear
anything back soon I'll assume you're fine with this and
move ahead towards unstable.
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
[1]: http://bugs.debian.org/787430
[2]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot
hopefully help. It tries to make the
executed codepath similar to what it was by adding an extra check on the
case where value of TYPE is "" and then exits 0 if it looks like an
extended dos partition.
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
diff --git a/co
18 matches
Mail list logo
