Hello. On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 02:39:16PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Andreas Henriksson <andr...@fatal.se> (2015-09-29): > > Fwiw, See also discussion with libthai maintainer about potentially > > providing an udeb in the future in https://bugs.debian.org/800369 > > To be fair, I looked into libthai and libdatrie when I first proposed > the patches for the switch from DirectFB to X.org back in early 2010. It > seemed Thai support was OK without those, so we decided to skip them. > I'm not sure it's worth adding them now. I'm with Theppitak > Karoonboonyanan on this: if support in d-i is sufficient for people to > actually install Debian without that, maybe we can keep the current > situation as it is.
Please note that I have no personal opinion on this. I don't know anything about thai (or libthai). I filed the bug to raise discussion to also include the libthai maintainer(s). I'm perfectly fine with the answer to it being just "no" sent to -done. Regards, Andreas Henriksson
