+ Anton Zinoviev (Tue, 02 Jun 2009 23:59:55 +0300):
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 10:19:45PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > I miss this functionality, and I don't think we should ditch it because
> > it's very handy (just doing a couple adjustments in a keymap, eg. for
Package: kbd,console-setup
Hello,
I think /etc/console-tools/remap was a very nice feature; I've recently
purged console-* from my system except console-setup, and installed kbd
instead because console-logs needs that.
I saw, then, that kbd ships /etc/kbd/remap, and the init scripts
supports it.
+ Bastian Blank (Sun, 24 May 2009 21:07:49 +0200):
> I would like to raise the minimum CPU requirement for the shipped Linux
> kernels in the i386 port to i686 (with cmov). For now I will not propose
> a change of the default machine type setting used by the compiler.
As Philipp Kern mentioned, y
+ Frans Pop (Wed, 20 May 2009 20:00:39 +0200):
> On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> > Still using the minimal install example (without selection "standard
> > system" nor other task), shouldn't them have their priority lowered
> > then?
> Possibly. But that is something that
+ Frans Pop (Thu, 21 May 2009 00:12:59 +0200):
> + ... dpkg -s passwd | sed -n '/^Version:/s,^Version: ,,p')
FWIW that can be written just as `sed -n 's/^Version: //p'`, since "p"
will only print if a substitution was made, but what you probably want
is `dpkg-query -W -f '${Version}\n' passwd`, w
+ Adeodato Simó (Wed, 13 May 2009 11:04:38 +0200):
> Hello,
> while trying to get an initial view of migrating KDE4 to testing with
> britney, I noticed that our "taskel-meta-faux" package [1] was rendered
> uninstallable because the kde-core metapackage is no longer provid
+ Adeodato Simó (Fri, 15 May 2009 13:44:52 +0200):
> + Frans Pop (Fri, 15 May 2009 12:34:36 +0200):
> > On Friday 15 May 2009, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > > AltGr is useless with the basic US layout because it doesn't define
> > > third level where the accented lett
+ Frans Pop (Fri, 15 May 2009 12:34:36 +0200):
> On Friday 15 May 2009, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > AltGr is useless with the basic US layout because it doesn't define
> > third level where the accented letters are situated.
> But AFAIK it can still be used for combining characters!
> Example: +' e
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.78
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-kde-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hello,
while trying to get an initial view of migrating KDE4 to testing with
britney, I noticed that our "taskel-meta-faux" package [1] was rendered
uninstallable because the kde-core metapackage
+ Adeodato Simó (Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:53:58 +0200):
> * put oldsys-preseed 3.2lenny1 udeb in lenny, replacing 3.2?
> * put all *-2.6.26-2-* kernel and module udebs in testing, REPLACING
> THEIR 2.6.26-1 COUNTERPARTS.
> * drop the *-2.6.26-1-* kernel and module udebs from u
+ Otavio Salvador (Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:48:32 -0300):
> > Hello,
> > Here a live sign [0] from the d-i builder for sparc
> > Yesterdays build, 2009-APR-16, failed with
> > E: Couldn't find package kernel-image-2.6.26-1-sparc64-di
> It looks like an outdated mirror; did you reproduce it again?
N
Hello,
With the recent first point release of Lenny, the known version
constraint “stable << testing << unstable” became endangered, since a
lot of packages saw updates in unstable whilst they still hadn’t been
updated in unstable or, more commonly, in testing.
The release team agreed with ftpmas
+ Christian Perrier (Sun, 12 Apr 2009 08:00:33 +0200):
> I'd like to keep Mondays with a two weeks rhythm
I think having regular meetings is not a bad idea, even if the’re going
to be really quick some of the times because there may not be much to
discuss. Though it should be worth mentioning wha
* Otavio Salvador [Sun, 29 Mar 2009 21:26:36 -0300]:
> > Most of these belong to regular packages, i.e. not udeb-only. There are
> > however two udeb-only packages. cdebconf-entropy has the same version in
> > testing and unstable, so pushing the Bin-NMU should be just fine.
> Yes, all fine.
> >
Hello,
I’ve just pushed the directfb transition to testing, and I’m looking
into pushing the needed udeb packages as well (libcairo-directfb2-udeb,
libgtk-directfb-2.0-0-udeb, etc.)
Most of these belong to regular packages, i.e. not udeb-only. There are
however two udeb-only packages. cdebconf-en
* Frans Pop [Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:19:37 +0100]:
> On Monday 23 March 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > 18:28 dato: i belive that we could check for any non-udeb
> >dependency. AFAIK no package should have them now.
> Almost true, but not quite. See my early mails
Hello,
while talking today with Otavio on #debian-release about the #520642
thread (I’ve Bin-NMUed pcre3/i386, btw, and dmraid will fix itself
becuase it’s seen a recent sourceful upload), the topic about udebs
depending on non-udebs came up. Otavio said:
18:28 dato: i belive that we could check
* Christian Perrier [Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:39:06 +0100]:
> Looking at this this morning, I finally found out that I had locally
> built packages sitting in localudebs, one of them being
> cdebconf-gtk-terminal, and:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> cdebconf-gtk-terminal: Depend
* Josselin Mouette [Sat, 21 Mar 2009 16:57:46 +0100]:
> Le samedi 21 mars 2009 à 15:34 +0100, Adeodato Simó a écrit :
> > gtk2-engines-udeb exhibits two problems on hppa, though the second of
> > them may be applicable to other arches as well.
> > In the first place, gtk2-
Package: gtk2-engines
Version: 1:2.16.1-2
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Hello,
gtk2-engines-udeb exhibits two problems on hppa, though the second of
them may be applicable to other arches as well.
In the first place, gtk2-engines-udeb 2.14.3-2 and 2.16.1-2 depend o
n the scripts, give some time for people
> to comment.
OK. Please just reply to this thread when you think we can start. Just
give a comprehensive list of the information you need in the page for
the first testing-summary script.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó d
ll of the above. I'll repeat
that our goal is to make things better for you, and that you have to
help us figure out what that entails.
Cheers!
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
atabase not exist for a small period of time.
> s/maybe//. It gets dropped and re-created.
> Unfortunately postgres currently can't do any real (and working)
> replication, so the merkel copy is handled in a rather ugly way...
I just submitted <http://bugs.debian.org/515173>.
--
* Frans Pop [Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:25:19 +0100]:
> On Friday 13 February 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Please make an effort not to submit bugs at RC severities if you're not
> > confident they apply.
> I checked the d-release mailing list for February which does not mentio
* Otavio Salvador [Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:22:11 -0200]:
> > What about kernel-wedge, also? (heads-up from Frans)
> Good catch! It is not required for d-i upload but for Lenny release.
> Please RM team:
> unblock kernel-wedge
Done.
--
Adeodato Simó
* Adeodato Simó [Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:32:12 +0100]:
> Hello,
And hi yet again...
> package|source | testing | unstable | ok
> ---+---+---+---+-
> libgcc1 | gcc-4.3
* Adeodato Simó [Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:32:53 +0100]:
> As a third follow-up, here's a list of *all* d-i build-dependencies
Which uncovered a bug in the script; please find the latest version
here:
http://git.debian.org/?p=tools-release/release.git;a=blob;f=scripts/d-i_bdep-sync;hb=H
* Adeodato Simó [Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:32:12 +0100]:
> Regarding those packages not in sync, both arcboot and mkvmlinuz are a
> translation-only upload, so I'll unblock them. As for gcc-4.3, I think
> 4.3.2-2 is Lenny material, I'll check with doko.
As a third follow-up, here&#x
es have an accompanying
userspace that shouldn't get much out of sync for things to work.)
> That's a post-lenny discussion though, but possibly worth considering on
> another list somewhere.
Definitely, thanks for bringing it up.
--
Adeodato Simó
* Adeodato Simó [Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:32:12 +0100]:
> The easy part is the handling of udeb-providing packages: we we'll just
> wait, as usual, for d-i RM ack/nack before unblocking. If an update
> *must* get through, and d-i RM acks it, we'll just copy the previous
> version
* Martin Michlmayr [Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:07:06 +0100]:
> * Adeodato Simó [2009-01-16 11:32]:
> > Now, for the less easy part: code that gets embedded. Steve Langasek has
> > kindly provided us with an initial draft for the list of packages that
> > should be checked [2]. This
tion. (Or it can be changed to
just accept a list of packages on stdin, and you can parse your
build-dependencies yourselves, as you wish.)
Thoughts?
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
* Martin Michlmayr [Wed, 31 Dec 2008 21:13:09 +0100]:
> * Adeodato Simó [2008-11-06 15:47]:
> > I think it's clear that the cruft tool should be patched not to propose
> > removal of such source packages, but although ftpmaster is open to
> > patches, somebody has t
* Otavio Salvador [Sat, 06 Dec 2008 15:52:19 -0200]:
> unblock ppp
> unblock openssh
> - cairo (looks OK but needs to be build in all arches)
> lvm2
All these are done. cairo in particular was the last one, it just went
in with the ongoing dinstall.
--
A
Window Managers, XFCE and LXDE for our users.
> > Andrew, do you also need/want the change to the nm-editor.desktop file?
> No, as you well explaned. :)
> Cheers,
> -Andrew
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer
ld it be appropriate to merge
the two?
Thanks in advance for any comments,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Joaquín Sabina - Cuando apri
* Adeodato Simó [Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:13:47 +0200]:
Oh, hi again.
> > partman-base # still lacks hppa build
I could offer you syncing other arches than hppa. Please let me know if
that's what you want.
--
Adeodato Simó
build
Seems the mail log got lost; I've given it back, it's a pity we didn't
did this yesterday.
Anything else? (Apart from cdebconf and partman-base, which we'll take
care of ASAP.)
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer
* Andrew Pollock [Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:17:40 +1000]:
> Hi,
> 3.1.1-5 correctly incorporates a previous NMU fixing a problem with LDAP
> integration, and includes some translation updates. Could you please let it
> into testing?
Fine by me, -boot?
--
A
gration,
or what should we do.
But, then, can some debian-boot person tell us (or work with us to find
out) what packages are in the "relevant for source compliance" category?
Anything else that I haven't replied to and that needed addressing,
please let me know.
to do it before d-i RC1 or another
> installer upload would be required to get it in sync with the archive.
It has been uploaded now. Shall I unblock it already? Does it need to
get into testing fast, or just having it in unstable is enough for the
RC1?
--
Adeodato Simó
* Otavio Salvador [Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:48:44 -0300]:
> Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * Otavio Salvador [Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:10:15 -0300]:
> >> Here goes the first set of unblocks for RC1:
> > Are all these udeb-only packages? If they are not, ca
* Otavio Salvador [Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:10:15 -0300]:
> Here goes the first set of unblocks for RC1:
Are all these udeb-only packages? If they are not, can we get a list
divided in two groups? (udeb-only vs not-udeb-only).
TIA,
--
Adeodato Simó dato
an extended period of time.
Ack, please ping us again when the sync should be done.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
- Are you sure we're good?
- Always.
--
-multipath. Daily built
> images *install testing*, they do *not* install unstable.
Now that you mention, is there some document one could read to educate
themselves with a high-level (or not so high level) overview of how all
that works? I'd be interested...
--
Adeodato Simó
ow.
As mentioned on IRC, when asking for migrations of udeb-only packages,
please say that they are udeb-only packges.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
The first step on t
* Adeodato Simó [Fri, 15 Aug 2008 22:54:31 +0100]:
> * Mark Hymers [Fri, 15 Aug 2008 22:30:56 +0100]:
> > On Fri, 15, Aug, 2008 at 10:18:19PM +0100, Adeodato Simó spoke thus..
> > > I think a good first try would be uploading the parted from stable
> > > (1.7.1-5.1) wi
* Mark Hymers [Fri, 15 Aug 2008 22:30:56 +0100]:
> On Fri, 15, Aug, 2008 at 10:18:19PM +0100, Adeodato Simó spoke thus..
> > I think a good first try would be uploading the parted from stable
> > (1.7.1-5.1) with increased version in the changelog to 1.7.1-5.1+b1,
> > w
(we'll waste
a bit of buildd time, I guess.)
The reason for the +b1 suffix in source is that the source will be just
dropped, and I recommend that so that parted-udeb/armel's version
clearly indicates that is built from 1.7.1-5.1 with no changes.
(A sourceful upload of 1.7
* Guido Günther [Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:28:19 +0200]:
> Hi Otavio,
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 05:53:09PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > adeodato simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Mini transition of what? libparted1.8-9 -> libparted1.8-10? Since the
> > >
* Otavio Salvador [Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:28:34 -0300]:
> Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * Otavio Salvador [Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:47:57 -0300]:
> <...>
> >> rootskel-gtk and udev should stay blocked.
> >> About udev .. I was mostly out last
;s OK I send a mail to
> debian-release ml asking for the unblocking.
Hello Otavio, any news on this?
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Luis Ed
u please review the changes in vte and acknowledge an upload to
> unstable?
Ok. Aside from autostuff, patch is not that big, so let's get this into
unstable, and see if somebody spots any regressions.
Is the development of this feature on the d-i side isolated in a way
that, should some
rted1.8-9 -> libparted1.8-10? Since the
1.8 transition itself hasn't happened yet (any news about that,
Otavio?), I guess we could squeeze it in, but... please assess: is the
patch safe at this stage for the installer?
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó
't like to have unused
> udebs on lenny.
Honest question: why? Does it have any negative impact?
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Any life, no matter how long and compl
dated nano-udeb, I'd like to see these cherrypicked patches in lenny.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of th
fit to bend the library freeze slightly to
> allow the packages built by the e2fsprogs source package into testing.
Ok, I trust you on this. Will unblock when I hear back from the d-i
people (because of the udeb).
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó
be great if some interested
party could help to get this done eventually.
Thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Que no te vendan amor sin espinas
-- Joaquín Sab
Hello.
I inquired on IRC, but since I got no response... I need pango1.0 to
migrate for a couple transitions, it is okay to migrate the udeb as
well?
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato
the delay.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Julio Bustamante - Amigo de las hadas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
* Frans Pop [Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:45:12 +0200]:
> On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > tasksel.list is automatically generated, but triggered by hand only, so
> > it would be nice if the tasksel maintainers could mail us whenever
> > there's a change
il us whenever
there's a change in the Key packages.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Elton John - Blessed
--
To U
h the revert will also be accepted into Lenny.
Ack. We're indeed letting -3 in, because it's blocking quite a few
packages. Paul, feel free to upload a new version at your earliest
convenience, and please somebody mail us for an unblock when -4 is ready
to migrate.
Than
I can't include in the
list for now (you'd need to ping us when they make it back to testing):
-8<-
lilo (...)
yaird
->8-
Other packages which don't fit:
-8<-
vmelilo: m68k-only, not in testing.
libc6-sparcv9: only in stable?
->8-
I'll mail -boot once the mechanis
* Aurelien Jarno [Wed, 21 May 2008 15:34:33 +0200]:
> Please unblock libusb/2:0.1.12-11 and usbutils/0.73-8, which are both
> blocked because of their udeb. They have no known regression.
Unblocked after ack from Otavio. Will syncs udebs when migrated.
Cheers,
--
Adeodat
* Adeodato Simó [Mon, 19 May 2008 23:12:31 +0200]:
> linux-2.6_tpu approved for migration (will hopefully migrate with the
> next britney run)
Meh, there were some old 2.6.18 and 2.6.22 packages in t-p-u that made
britney think 2.6.24-7 was out of date.
Cruft removed by ftpmaster now,
ernel-di-s390-2.6
> linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6
linux-2.6_tpu approved for migration (will hopefully migrate with the
next britney run), and all 11 di kernel packages migrated, visible with
the next dinstall.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó
let the tools take care of that -- which I have to
do it anyway, to check there weren't any typos ;)
> Please also sync following packages:
> cdebconf-entropy
> aboot-installer
Both udeb-only packages synced, will be there with tomorrow's first
(And the
> current OpenLDAP packages desperately need another maintainer with time to
> work on them, but that's a different problem.)
I don't see such package. Maybe it has to do with the fact that that
libldap2 is still Prio: important? Frans, are Prio: important packages
n with the next dinstall.
Btw, a RM bug against ftp.d.o to remove partconf/arm (1.22) from
unstable is needed? (The HeidiDI scripts wanted to put it in testing --
I manually removed it this time.)
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato a
n-issue (documentation could be
> improved) and has been downgraded to wishlist; the other is not a
> regression and has now been marked as such in the BTS.
> Which means it should now be possible to hint util-linux.
Ok, will migrate as above, thanks.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó
* Frans Pop [Wed, 14 May 2008 13:32:53 +0200]:
> On Wednesday 14 May 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > > All 70 udeb-only packages synced, that is, source + udebs.
> > Except "partman-auto-cryto", which was on your list, but it doesn't seem
> > to exi
> All 70 udeb-only packages synced, that is, source + udebs.
Except "partman-auto-cryto", which was on your list, but it doesn't seem
to exist. Mentioning in case there was a typo somewhere.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.e
things right -- if something needs undoing, there is time
until dinstall.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Hooverphonic -
* Kurt Roeckx [Wed, 07 May 2008 21:09:15 +0200]:
> I've just uploaded openssl 0.9.8g-9 which contains an important security
> fix. Please let it migrate to testing.
This has been unblocked by aba after ack from D-I team.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó
* Otavio Salvador [Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:58:21 -0300]:
> Hello RM team,
> Here goes a new set of hints, commented.
Done.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debi
t; Please hint.
Unblocked.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there
is no need to do so, almost ev
* Otavio Salvador [Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:26:19 -0300]:
> unblock busybox/1:1.1.3-5
> Please remove gnu-fdisk from block list since it doesn't build udebs
> anymore.
Both done.
Thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
De
e package no longer produces an udeb, I've removed discover-data
from the permanent freeze file, along with discover1 and discover1-data.
CC'ing the d-i team in case there's something wrong with that; discover-data
is only 3 days old, so they have a full week to react.
All unblocked.
Thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Eric Clapton - Fall like rain
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
on
> > 1.2-1, which could not go into testing because of a newly discovered RC
> > bug.
> 17:38 < bubulle> Lunar^: iso-codes is OK, imho
> So please add the following hint:
> unblock iso-codes/1.3-1
Done.
Thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó
copies of the library are provided on i386).
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Joaquín Sabina - Benditos malditos (al pil al pil)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
rge
ships without plain i386 support and that is clearly noted in the
release notes.
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Listening to: Aphex Twin - Xtal
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the wo
83 matches
Mail list logo
