On 05/08/2024 at 01:07, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 12:16:23AM +0200, Håvard F. Aasen wrote:
Could default home folder permissions lean towards greater privacy,
while administrators can adjust permissions to be less strict if
necessary?
What I would like is to have 'HOME
Chris Hofstaedtler writes:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 12:16:23AM +0200, Håvard F. Aasen wrote:
>> Could default home folder permissions lean towards greater privacy,
>> while administrators can adjust permissions to be less strict if
>> necessary?
Isn't it worth noting that normal users can adjus
Control: reassign -1 debian-installer
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 12:16:23AM +0200, Håvard F. Aasen wrote:
> Could default home folder permissions lean towards greater privacy,
> while administrators can adjust permissions to be less strict if
> necessary?
> What I would like is to have 'HOME_MO
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 debian-installer
Bug #1070085 [login] Enhancing default home folder permissions for improved
privacy
Bug reassigned from package 'login' to 'debian-installer'.
No longer marked as found in versions shadow/1:4.13+dfsg1-4.
Ignoring request to alter fixed v
On 24/07/2024 at 17:16, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Poll: What should be the MIN, MAX and minimum disk size to reach MAX for
Here is a first proposal to start the discussion. The raw priority value
in recipes is quite obscure, and it turns out that expressing it with
the minimum disk size to reac
On Sun, Aug 04, 2024 at 01:32:24PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 04-08-2024 13:22, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The question would be whether you want to enforce it in Britney,
> > which basically implies that Autobuild: should default to yes in
> > non-free-firmware.
>
> I see this as a rephr
On Sun, Aug 04, 2024 at 10:31:30AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>...
> On 04-08-2024 09:31, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > That leaves us with 3/15 and the question whether we want to commit for
> > future firmware.
>
> I don't think we need to commit, just express a very strong desire to build
> on buildd
Hi,
On 04-08-2024 13:22, Adrian Bunk wrote:
The question would be whether you want to enforce it in Britney,
which basically implies that Autobuild: should default to yes in
non-free-firmware.
I see this as a rephrasing of the discussion, so I can only agree that
that's the question.
You c
Hi,
On 04-08-2024 09:31, Niels Thykier wrote:
That leaves us with 3/15 and the question whether we want to commit for
future firmware.
I don't think we need to commit, just express a very strong desire to
build on buildds when possible, and be practical if we can't.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Roland Clobus:
On 03/08/2024 18:30, Niels Thykier wrote:
Had a quick look at the testing `Sources` file for non-free-firmware.
We are 10/15 on `Autobuild: yes` with remaining 5 not having the header.
...
The 5 that are not `Autobuild: yes` would be:
atmel-firmware
bluez-firmware
I was infor
10 matches
Mail list logo
