Re: bookworm release date?

2023-02-17 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hey folks, Cyril and I are in broad agreement on stuff, just adding a couple of points... On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 11:44:47PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Hi Paul, > >Paul Gevers (2023-02-17): >> Yes, I know the debian-installer is not a done deal, so kibi, please >> let us know where you think

Re: bookworm release date?

2023-02-17 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Paul, Paul Gevers (2023-02-17): > Yes, I know the debian-installer is not a done deal, so kibi, please > let us know where you think we stand with d-i (briefly is OK, I know > you normally report extensively elsewhere) and when you think d-i can > realistically be in a releasable state. (Sayin

bookworm release date?

2023-02-17 Thread Paul Gevers
Dear Release Team colleagues, dear Boot team colleagues, I just sent out a bits from the RT where I'm claiming that bookworm is in a good state. And now I'm going to be extremely bold now: aim for the shortest freeze in Debian history. What do people think of the idea to start picking a releas

Bug#592834: Seeing this under bookworm/sid

2023-02-17 Thread Charles Curley
The unattended upgrade of grub failed (due to the fact that I had replaced the hard drive and used dd to copy sector for sector from the old one to the new, and that changed the identity of the hard drive). Per the instructions in the unattended upgrade message, I ran the following: root@white:~#

Re: Review for the non-free-firmware template in apt-setup

2023-02-17 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Just following up on that bit for information: Holger Wansing (2023-01-22): > Cyril Brulebois wrote (Sun, 22 Jan 2023 16:24:12 +0100): > > I've selected sublevel 5 instead of sublevel 1, to make sure this isn't > > going to hurt the translation status (which localechooser uses to warn > > a

Bug#1031431: debian-installer-netboot-images: FTBFS: Building 20220917, but bookworm has 20230207, failing the build

2023-02-17 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Lucas Nussbaum (2023-02-17): > OK, I remembered about skipping debian-installer, but wasn't sure about > debian-installer-netboot-images Thanks and sorry for being a pain, I know we're the usual ugly duckling in the project… Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)

Bug#1031431: debian-installer-netboot-images: FTBFS: Building 20220917, but bookworm has 20230207, failing the build

2023-02-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 17/02/23 at 13:07 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Version: 20230217 > > Hi Lucas, > > Lucas Nussbaum (2023-02-17): > > Source: debian-installer-netboot-images > > Version: 20220917+rebuild1 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: FTBFS &g

Bug#1031431: marked as done (debian-installer-netboot-images: FTBFS: Building 20220917, but bookworm has 20230207, failing the build)

2023-02-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
g this archive rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20230216;users=lu...@debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20230216&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org

Please dak copy-installer 20230217

2023-02-17 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, FTP team, please sync the installer from sid to testing, as it seems to be Installed for all release architectures (9 total, even if mipsel just went in): dak copy-installer 20230217 Note: I didn't request a copy for the previous version (20230207) as it was mostly a canary upload, m

Bug#1026027: graphical installer: using nano in a installer shell fails

2023-02-17 Thread Benno Schulenberg
Philip Hands (2022-12-15): Perhaps the presence of the termcap file is irrelevant, or could it be that nano used to be able to make use of that, and more recently only supports terminfo? This is the explanation, I think. Nano removed support for Slang in version 5.5. The nano-udeb (5.4) th