Hi List,
I am reopening an old thread, I am trying to achieve the same thing
today and I did find another way to do it as reported here.
> I have open a wishlist bug report [1] describing your issue. Work still
> needs to be done, though.
>
> If you feel like giving it a shot, you can probabl
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 08:25:24 +0100
Source: console-setup
Binary: keyboard-configuration console-setup console-setup-mini
console-setup-linux console-setup-freebsd bdf2psf console-setup-udeb
console-setup-amiga-ekmap cons
On 2015-03-05 07:07, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> here's a first round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
> jessie RC2. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
>
Hi,
Done all except:
> [...]
> # various keymap/options/etc. changes:
> unblock console
console-setup_1.118_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
console-setup_1.118.dsc
console-setup_1.118.tar.xz
keyboard-configuration_1.118_all.deb
console-setup_1.118_all.deb
console-setup-mini_1.118_all.deb
console-setup-linux_1.118_all.deb
console-setu
console-setup_1.118_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
console-setup_1.118.dsc
console-setup_1.118.tar.xz
keyboard-configuration_1.118_all.deb
console-setup_1.118_all.deb
console-setup-mini_1.118_all.deb
console-setup-linux_1.118_all.deb
> # various keymap/options/etc. changes:
> unblock console-setup/1.117
> unblock-udeb console-setup/1.117
Crap. I'm just seeing this 5 minutes after uploading 1.118 with 5 more
translation updates.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> Thanks for your work on console-setup. Was a call for translations
> issued? It seems git only has a very tiny number of updated
> translations:
No, no call for translations.
I actually rely on translators who want D-I to be fully translated to
follow its status through the status pages
(http
Hi people,
here's a first round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
jessie RC2. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
# mainly l10n, plus removal of stray generators/92volatile file
unblock apt-setup/1:0.93
unblock-udeb apt-setup/1:0.93
# various keymap/options
Hi Colin & other grub2 people,
Should we unblock grub2 2.02~beta2-21 as it stands, or are there any
possible issues that should be tackled before we consider unblocking it?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Christian & Samuel,
Debian FTP Masters (2015-02-22):
> Changes:
> console-setup (1.117) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>[ Samuel Thibault ]
>* Fix default South Korea keymap in d-i, closes: #40.
>* Add Burmese and Philipines choices.
>* Set default layout for Myanmar (Burme
Control: reassign -1 partman-base
Control: forcemerge 778773 -1
markermoniker (2014-11-29):
> Package: installation-reports
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> While attempting to set up a system with an LVM inside an encrypted
> partition, the installer hangs while re-scanning the d
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 partman-base
Bug #771485 [installation-reports] installation-reports: Installation disk scan
hangs at 81% with LVM inside crypt partition
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'partman-base'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bu
Hi Michael,
Michael Fincham (2015-03-05):
> Package: installation-reports
> Severity: important
> Tags: d-i
>
> Installation proceeds smoothly on this machine however on boot after being
> prompted for my LUKS password the screen blanks and does not recover.
>
> This can be fixed by changing /e
Shane Roach (2015-03-04):
> Boot method: CD iso on CD and thumbdrive
> Image version:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/jessie_di_rc1/amd64/iso-cd/
> and
> http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/
> and h
Michael Walle (2015-03-04):
> Am 2015-02-26 17:34, schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> >Michael Walle (2015-02-26):
> >>looks good, but you could apply the attached patch which remove the
> >>TEMP_DTB variable and use the global TEMP_DTBS.
> >
> >Pushed, thanks!
>
> I've tried the daily d-i image from 20
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
Installation proceeds smoothly on this machine however on boot after being
prompted for my LUKS password the screen blanks and does not recover.
This can be fixed by changing /etc/default/grub to specify the video mode:
GRUB_CMDLINE_L
Am 2015-02-26 17:34, schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
Michael Walle (2015-02-26):
looks good, but you could apply the attached patch which remove the
TEMP_DTB variable and use the global TEMP_DTBS.
Pushed, thanks!
I've tried the daily d-i image from 2015-03-01. Everything works fine.
At least unti
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 02:43:48PM -0600, Shane Roach wrote:
>
> $ lspci
> [all on a single line]
>
$ lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 4th Gen Core Processor DRAM Controller
(rev 06)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th Ge
$ lspci00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 4th Gen Core Processor DRAM
Controller (rev 06)00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th
Gen Core Processor PCI Express x16 Controller (rev 06)00:01.1 PCI bridge: Intel
Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th Gen Core Processor PCI Express x
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of thi
Cyril Brulebois, le Tue 03 Mar 2015 04:00:27 +0100, a écrit :
> > - If it's too late, I think it's still a good idea but there is no
> > emergency and it's better to not do it now. I will be back after the
> > relaese.
> > - Else, I can try to help: I don't have commit access on the
> > repositor
Please use gor...@morehouse.me.
I don't use the gmail, I'll see about setting up a forward.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1ytdx7-0001ue...@rmm6prod02
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 17:46:34 +0100
Source: busybox
Binary: busybox busybox-static busybox-udeb busybox-syslogd udhcpc udhcpd
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1:1.22.0-15
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintain
busybox_1.22.0-15_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
busybox_1.22.0-15.dsc
busybox_1.22.0-15.debian.tar.xz
busybox_1.22.0-15_amd64.deb
busybox-static_1.22.0-15_amd64.deb
busybox-udeb_1.22.0-15_amd64.udeb
busybox-syslogd_1.22.0-15_all.deb
udhcpc_1.22
Your message dated Wed, 04 Mar 2015 17:33:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#776186: fixed in busybox 1:1.22.0-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #776186,
regarding busybox: CVE-2014-9645: modprobe wrongly accepts paths as module names
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Control: reassign -1 partman-base
Control: forcemerge 778773 -1
Hi Gordon,
and sorry for the lag before getting back to you. I had this issue
flagged but haven't found time to work it. But some other bug report
came up lately and some people had time to debug it!
Gordon Morehouse (2014-11-30):
Your message dated Wed, 4 Mar 2015 18:15:05 +0100
with message-id <20150304171505.ga22...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#771623: installation-reports: expert installer
'targeted' initrd does not contain modules for USB keyboard on intended system
has caused the Debian Bug report #771623,
regar
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 partman-base
Bug #771617 [installation-reports] installer beta 2: jessie parted_server
segfault on AMD Athlon64
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'partman-base'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #771617 to the same valu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 778773 serious
Bug #778773 {Done: Cyril Brulebois } [partman-base] Jessie RC1
Installer parted server segfault
Bug #773274 {Done: Cyril Brulebois } [partman-base]
installation-reports: parted_server segfault
Severity set to 'serious' fr
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 partman-base
Bug #773274 [installation-reports] installation-reports: parted_server segfault
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'partman-base'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #773274 to the same values
previously set
I
Control: reassign -1 partman-base
Control: forcemerge 778773 -1
Matt Taggart (2014-12-16):
> Package: installation-reports
> Version: 20141216-00:08
>
> When attempting an install using a daily image, I ran into a case where
> parted_server segfaults with the following:
>
> parted_server[29651
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 17:30:29 +0100
Source: partman-base
Binary: partman-base partman-utils
Architecture: source
Version: 181
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Cyril Brul
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 778773 partman-base
Bug #778773 {Done: Cyril Brulebois } [installation-reports]
Jessie RC1 Installer parted server segfault
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'partman-base'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 05:22:22PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Wow, I'm glad I had been busy with other bits while you were discovering
> this. This seems spot-on!
I was just looking at the code and was trying to understand what was
initializing the structure when I suddenly noticed that no on
partman-base_181_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-base_181.dsc
partman-base_181.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
Michael Tokarev (2015-03-04):
> > Looking at the just uploaded -15, I don't understand what you tried
> > to do there.
Woops, I clearly erred here, sorry about that. Got bitten by the
"uploading 1.22.0-15 to unstable" commit…
> I didn't upload -15, I just tried to clean up what's left before I
>
Your message dated Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:48:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#778773: fixed in partman-base 181
has caused the Debian Bug report #778773,
regarding Jessie RC1 Installer parted server segfault
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch pending
Bug #778773 [installation-reports] Jessie RC1 Installer parted server segfault
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
--
778773: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778773
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with prob
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:24:54 +0100 Rebecca Palmer
wrote:
> An (untested) way to fix this bug without needing it would be to put the
> unpack and configure steps in a single retry loop (instead of the two
> separate retry loops at scripts/sid:187-197), allowing Pre-Depends to be
> dealt with th
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Lennart Sorensen (2015-03-04):
> It seems to me inspecting the code of parted_server.c that:
>
> deactivate_exception_handler();
> fstype = ped_file_system_probe(&(part->geom));
> if (fstype == NULL) {
>
04.03.2015 19:10, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Looking at the just uploaded -15, I don't understand what you tried to
> do there.
I didn't upload -15, I just tried to clean up what's left
before I retire, and - unintentionally - pushed things to
git.d.o. It was my mistake. More, we have 2 branches,
Michael Tokarev (2015-03-04):
> 02.03.2015 19:53, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > […]
> I was calling you that because of a single word you used - intrusive -
> for changes which are a) very localized to d/rules (touching a little
> place of it) and b) not affecting anything you care, and especially
>
It seems to me inspecting the code of parted_server.c that:
deactivate_exception_handler();
fstype = ped_file_system_probe(&(part->geom));
if (fstype == NULL) {
oprintf("none\n");
} else {
Your message dated Wed, 4 Mar 2015 11:41:40 +0100
with message-id <20150304114140.59093a62@s5.lokal>
and subject line done
has caused the Debian Bug report #779100,
regarding Wheezy stable on Dell Latitude E 4300 including backports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The following 40_custom in /etc/grub.d/ fixed the issue for me:
> #!/bin/sh
> exec tail -n +3 $0
> # This file provides an easy way to add custom menu entries. Simply type the
> # menu entries you want to add after this comment. Be careful not to c
Ian Campbell (2015-03-04):
> (adding kibi for the unblock question. I also added d-boot I don't
> think there is anything sensitive here so I hope that's ok)
Sure, no worries.
> On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 21:30 +0100, Karsten Merker wrote:
> > Btw, does anything speak against requesting an unblock fo
02.03.2015 19:53, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff (2015-03-02):
[]
>> I'm slightly confused here. Is 1:1.22.0-9+deb8u1 different from
>> the upload you mentioned above?
>
> It's basically the same thing as I proposed initially, but with
> different changes in the git history because
(adding kibi for the unblock question. I also added d-boot I don't think
there is anything sensitive here so I hope that's ok)
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 21:30 +0100, Karsten Merker wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 08:45:55AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 23:19 +0100, Karsten Mer
48 matches
Mail list logo
