Subject: installation-reports: Needs a /vmlinuz file that points to boot image?
Package: installation-reports
Dear Maintainer,
After upgrade from stable(Wheezy) to testing(Jessie) (via modifying
/etc/apt/sources.list to say Jessie instead of Stable or Wheezy), the machine
wouldn't boot. (grub cou
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
Dear maintainers,
Please provide a method to allow the installer to ignore the 'Valid-Until'
field for repositories during install. Currently, one can tell Apt/Aptitude
directly to do this via:
# apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until
Matthias Klumpp (2014-12-01):
> Package: debootstrap
> Version: 1.0.66
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi!
> Could you please add support for the Tanglu[1] Debian derivative?
> This includes three suites at time:
> * Aequorea
> * Bartholomea
> * Chromodoris
> I have a patch attached whi
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.66
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi!
Could you please add support for the Tanglu[1] Debian derivative?
This includes three suites at time:
* Aequorea
* Bartholomea
* Chromodoris
I have a patch attached which adds Tanglu support.
I also attched a second patch w
Michael Tokarev (2014-12-01):
> So, can someone please tell me what's wrong with this unblock request?
I did write in my first reply:
“At this stage, I'd rather see the security fix only.”
> I can try to fix built-using generation adding gcc to the mix but I'm
> afraid to do that this late in
So, can someone please tell me what's wrong with
this unblock request?
I can try to fix built-using generation adding gcc
to the mix but I'm afraid to do that this late in
the release cycle, especially after it required so
many iterations to get the most important in this
context part of built-usi
Steve McIntyre (2014-12-01):
> Hmmm, you're right. There's some existing inconsistencies already,
> which don't help. In various places we already use "EFI" (e.g. in the
> GRUB package names, EFI System Partition etc.) but in others it's
> UEFI. Maybe we'd be better with just EFI everywhere...?
L
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 03:52:51PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Steve McIntyre (2014-12-01):
>> Control: severity 767037 serious
>> Control: tag 767037 +patch
>>
>> [ Raising severity to serious as I've heard more and more reports of
>> the problems here recently. ]
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> i
Steve McIntyre (2014-12-01):
> Control: severity 767037 serious
> Control: tag 767037 +patch
>
> [ Raising severity to serious as I've heard more and more reports of
> the problems here recently. ]
>
> Hi folks,
>
> i have two patches attached here, one for grub and one for
> grub-installer.
Control: severity 767037 serious
Control: tag 767037 +patch
[ Raising severity to serious as I've heard more and more reports of
the problems here recently. ]
Hi folks,
i have two patches attached here, one for grub and one for
grub-installer. They implement the logic I described below and are
- Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 13:14:07 +0100, a écrit :
> > - Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> > > MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 12:06:35 +0100, a écrit :
> > > > and MATE is much more suit when we try to have a universal desktop with
> >
MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 13:14:07 +0100, a écrit :
> - Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> > MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 12:06:35 +0100, a écrit :
> > > and MATE is much more suit when we try to have a universal desktop with
> > > braille, speech and magnifying, in part
- Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 12:06:35 +0100, a écrit :
> > and MATE is much more suit when we try to have a universal desktop with
> > braille, speech and magnifying, in particular due to its visual
> > customization capabilities, disappeared in gn
MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 12:06:35 +0100, a écrit :
> and MATE is much more suit when we try to have a universal desktop with
> braille, speech and magnifying, in particular due to its visual customization
> capabilities, disappeared in gnome.
Mmm, but do we have magnification su
>
> > which seems to enact that gnome is fine enough.
>
> Yes, again, gnome *is* fine enough. But can't we fine-tune the default
> when we know for sure that the user is using braille? Notably since it
> seems we'd better go with gnome with its integrated magnifier for people
> with low vision,
Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 11:36:06 +0100, a écrit :
> > Well, I don't remember an announcement about it. I didn't know that
> > the choice had been actually really settled,[...]
>
> Well, you could have asked;
Well, that's what I am doing. I guess my timeout value was just too
large.
Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 11:36:06 +0100, a écrit :
> > It seemed clear to me, except that since at the time the poll was done
> > MATE was actually not among the choices in the evaluation chart (and not
> > even a task), Jean-Philippe made it a special case.
>
> !!
>
> “[…] I think Deb
Samuel Thibault (2014-12-01):
> Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 10:39:17 +0100, a écrit :
> > With the tasksel/3.25 upload and the default switch back to gnome, it
> > looked to me that the accessibility side was taken care of.
>
> What do you mean by "taken care of"?
>
> If you mean fixing
Hello,
Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 10:39:17 +0100, a écrit :
> With the tasksel/3.25 upload and the default switch back to gnome, it
> looked to me that the accessibility side was taken care of.
What do you mean by "taken care of"?
If you mean fixing them, the few accessibility issues th
Samuel Thibault (2014-12-01):
> Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 09:41:20 +0100, a écrit :
> > > As it seems that Jessie will install the gnome desktop by default, I
> > > would like to upload the attached changes. The idea is that the most
> > > accessible desktop we have in Debian is MATE
>
On Montag, 1. Dezember 2014, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-accessibil...@lists.debian.org
>
> I then guess bts only keep the last one.
seperating them with commas on the same line works.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitall
Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 09:41:20 +0100, a écrit :
> > As it seems that Jessie will install the gnome desktop by default, I
> > would like to upload the attached changes. The idea is that the most
> > accessible desktop we have in Debian is MATE
>
> Why are we learning about this only
Samuel Thibault (2014-12-01):
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> unblock brltty/5.2~20141018-3
> unblock espeakup/1:0.71-19
>
> Hello,
>
> As it seems that Jessie will install the gnome desktop by default, I
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
