Version check failed:
Your upload included the source package partman-efi, version 42,
however testing already has version 42.
Uploads to unstable must have a higher version than present in testing.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were reject
partman-efi_42_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-efi_42_i386.udeb
partman-efi_42.dsc
partman-efi_42.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.deb
partman-efi_42_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
partman-efi_42_i386.udeb
partman-efi_42.dsc
partman-efi_42.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ.
Your message dated Thu, 21 Aug 2014 05:22:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#698105: fixed in tasksel 3.21
has caused the Debian Bug report #698105,
regarding Please remove pcmciautils from laptop task
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Thu, 21 Aug 2014 05:22:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#758762: fixed in tasksel 3.21
has caused the Debian Bug report #758762,
regarding Please drop acpi-support from task-laptop
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Quoting Michael Biebl (bi...@debian.org):
> Package: tasksel-data
> Version: 3.20
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> looking at [1] I'm really concerned that we still install acpi-support
> by default via task-laptop. acpi-support does a lot of scary stuff and
> pulls in deprecated components like co
Quoting Holger Wansing (li...@wansing-online.de):
> Hello ,
Several people you explicitly added are no longer active. You mùay
want to forward this to the respective l10n lists (I did so for French).
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 758762 task-laptop
Bug #758762 [tasksel-data] Please drop acpi-support from task-laptop
Bug reassigned from package 'tasksel-data' to 'task-laptop'.
No longer marked as found in versions tasksel/3.20.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versi
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #757985 [debian-installer] kfreebsd: hang with ENOSPC after a few
components are loaded
Added tag(s) patch.
--
757985: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757985
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi,
The simple patch for this issue is as follows. It has been tested now
on kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 with varying amounts of available
RAM.
* On kfreebsd, use dynamically-sized tmpfs for:
- /var/cache/anna
- /var/lib/cdebconf
to avoid running out
I'd like to add, that this would mean two less system daemons running:
acpid and console-kit-daemon, without relevant loss of functionality.
You'd still have the shutdown-on-powerbutton-press feature or the
suspend-on-lid-close handling via logind.
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seekin
Package: tasksel-data
Version: 3.20
Severity: normal
Hi,
looking at [1] I'm really concerned that we still install acpi-support
by default via task-laptop. acpi-support does a lot of scary stuff and
pulls in deprecated components like consolekit on everyones laptop.
With the switch to systemd, t
Samuel Thibault (2014-08-21):
> Cyril Brulebois, le Sat 02 Aug 2014 02:31:22 +0200, a écrit :
> > Debian FTP Masters (2014-04-02):
> > > localechooser (2.63) unstable; urgency=high
> >
> > it'd be nice to stick to $version rather than debian/$version as far as
> > git tags go.
>
> Mmm, I indee
Am 21.01.2013 22:30, schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> Christian PERRIER (14/01/2013):
>> That seems fair, though I think it's a bit late for this to happen
>> wrt the release.
>>
>> I was about to do the removal when partly cleaning out tasks at
>> DebConf 11, then finally I remained conservative.
>>
>>
Cyril Brulebois, le Sat 02 Aug 2014 02:31:22 +0200, a écrit :
> Debian FTP Masters (2014-04-02):
> > localechooser (2.63) unstable; urgency=high
>
> it'd be nice to stick to $version rather than debian/$version as far as
> git tags go.
Mmm, I indeed didn't notice that. I had just used git-buil
Cyril Brulebois, le Thu 21 Aug 2014 02:03:48 +0200, a écrit :
> Steven Chamberlain (2014-08-21):
> > On 21/08/14 00:23, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > > Using qemu-system-i386 with the -smp 2 flag, I started seeing weird
> > > issues early in d-i:
> >
> > It seems more likely this was triggered by
Steven Chamberlain (2014-08-21):
> retitle 758757 kfreebsd-10: d-i bugs caused by qemu-system-i386+kvm
> thanks
>
> On 21/08/14 00:23, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > Using qemu-system-i386 with the -smp 2 flag, I started seeing weird
> > issues early in d-i:
>
> It seems more likely this was trig
Package: kernel-image-10.0-1-486-di
Version: 10.0-6
Severity: important
Affects: debian-installer
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Using qemu-system-i386 with the -smp 2 flag, I started seeing weird
issues early in d-i: a boot-time generated file
/var/lib/cdebconf/templates.dat bei
Package: libgcrypt20
Version: 1.6.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: breaks some rdepends
Hi,
I think we discussed some libgcrypt11/libgcrypt20 udeb things lately,
but maybe something was lost along the way. Anyway, libgcrypt20's shlibs
file contains:
| libgcrypt 20 libgcrypt20 (>=1.6.0-0)
| ud
Package: libcryptsetup4-udeb
Version: 2:1.6.6-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
your package is no longer installable, because it now depends on
libgcrypt20-udeb, which is nowhere to be found.
This means at least these packages are uninstallable:
partman-crypto-dm
Package: efi-reader
Version: 0.11
Severity: wishlist
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
arm64 is a UEFI architecture, and there are some ARMv7 (i.e.) armhf
UEFI platforms too. Please add arm64 and armhf to the arch list.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.6
APT prefers stable
APT po
Package: partman-efi
Version: 42
Severity: wishlist
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
arm64 is a UEFI architecture, and there are some ARMv7 (i.e.) armhf
UEFI platforms too. Please add arm64 and armhf to the arch list.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.6
APT prefers stable
APT pol
Hi!
On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 20:11:28 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hello ,
I stepped down as translator for the manual some time ago, if there is
still some place that says otherwise I'd like to know, to be able to
correct it.
Thanks,
Guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lis
On 20/08/14 22:38, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Steven Chamberlain (2014-08-20):
>> Any ideas why debian-installer/main-menu would fail to display, with
>> this error:
>>> WARNING **: Internal error! Cannot find "debian-installer/main-menu doesn't
>>> exist" in menu.
>>
>> This is a kfreebsd-i386 d-i
Steven Chamberlain (2014-08-20):
> Hi,
>
> Any ideas why debian-installer/main-menu would fail to display, with
> this error:
> > WARNING **: Internal error! Cannot find "debian-installer/main-menu doesn't
> > exist" in menu.
>
> This is a kfreebsd-i386 d-i image I've built myself from
> debian
On 13/08/14 02:56, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> [...] failure to
> create a swap partition on /dev/ada0; [...]
>From /var/log/syslog:
> partman: mkswap: short write
mkswap seems to be a busybox utility for formatting Linux swap space.
Replacing it with (a shell wrapper around) /bin/true fixes it for
Hi,
Any ideas why debian-installer/main-menu would fail to display, with
this error:
> WARNING **: Internal error! Cannot find "debian-installer/main-menu doesn't
> exist" in menu.
This is a kfreebsd-i386 d-i image I've built myself from
debian-installer Git and udebs from jessie. I've never se
Hello ,
today I have introduced some changes in files of all xml-based translations
of the debian-installer manual to sync them with english.
The changing is basically:
Since the graphical installer is to become the default installer for
i386 and amd64 in the Jessie release, it is no longer ap
Perhaps we should find time to hack at DebConf
-T
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 01:38:44PM -0700, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>
>>So far as I know, no progress has been made on the above steps or any
>>alternate approach.
>
> Ditto, I've not seen (or
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 01:19:52AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 14/08/14 18:15, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > [...] If a
> > single extra udeb (or udeb size increase, which happens from time to
> > time) is going to break kfreebsd-*, it seems to me that their status
> > is far too brittle.
>
30 matches
Mail list logo
