Bug#704748: Not a practical issue (could even be considered a feature...:-))

2013-04-14 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Steven Chamberlain (ste...@pyro.eu.org): > On 14/04/13 11:03, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > As a consequence, having the desktop-gnome task broken on kFreeBSD > > because of the dependency on n-m-gnome can be considered as non > > release critical... > > Just for the record, I'm not happy a

Processed: Re: Bug#496068: [synaptic] include debian internet repository by default on new installations

2013-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 debian-installer: no non-security mirror configured after > no-network install Bug #496068 [synaptic] [synaptic] include debian internet repository by default on new installations Changed Bug title to 'debian-installer: no non-security mirror configured

Re: Bug#496068: [synaptic] include debian internet repository by default on new installations

2013-04-14 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Control: retitle -1 debian-installer: no non-security mirror configured after no-network install Control: reassign -1 debian-installer CSights wrote: > Package: synaptic > Version: 0.62 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi, > I just finished installing "Lenny" from the test CD1. At the time of >

Bug#704748: Not a practical issue (could even be considered a feature...:-))

2013-04-14 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 14.04.2013 20:56, schrieb Steven Chamberlain: > On 14/04/13 11:03, Christian PERRIER wrote: >> As a consequence, having the desktop-gnome task broken on kFreeBSD >> because of the dependency on n-m-gnome can be considered as non >> release critical... > > Just for the record, I'm not happy abou

Bug#705118: debian-installer: FTBFS on armhf: Unable to locate package nic-modules-3.2.0-4-mx5-di

2013-04-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2013-04-14 at 23:41 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: [...] > Sorry to answer late, I only have been able to test it now. > Unfortunately the vexpress image is now broken, due to this change: > > | * Replace nic-modules with nic-{usb,wireless}-modules in armhf netboot > |images (Closes: #7

Bug#705118: debian-installer: FTBFS on armhf: Unable to locate package nic-modules-3.2.0-4-mx5-di

2013-04-14 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 11:41:25PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:53:12AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Control: tag -1 patch moreinfo > > > > Cyril Brulebois (10/04/2013): > > > Patches (preferably tested ;)) against src:debian-installer to update > > > package lis

Re: Gnome installability vs. GNU/kFreeBSD

2013-04-14 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 09/04/13 19:15, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > - gdm3 … doesn't finish loading. It fullscreen-says "Oops, an error occured". > - lightdm + "Gnome": same. > - lightdm + "Gnome classic": same. Found a workaround for this :) But it is strange... 1. Start the system without gdm3 (e.g. update-rc.d

Re: Gnome installability vs. GNU/kFreeBSD

2013-04-14 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 09/04/13 19:15, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > I just did (in kvm/qemu) and the result isn't great (for Gnome): Thank you very much for testing. > - gdm3 … doesn't finish loading. It fullscreen-says "Oops, an error occured". Confirmed: gdm3 shows the 'fail whale' modal dialog; at least the c

Bug#705118: debian-installer: FTBFS on armhf: Unable to locate package nic-modules-3.2.0-4-mx5-di

2013-04-14 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:53:12AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Control: tag -1 patch moreinfo > > Cyril Brulebois (10/04/2013): > > Patches (preferably tested ;)) against src:debian-installer to update > > package lists for armhf/{mx5,vexpress} are more than welcome. Also, > > (I know I'm ask

Re: netcfg questions not asked with priority=critical. HD partition recipe.

2013-04-14 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Regid Ichira, le Sat 13 Apr 2013 19:37:14 +0300, a écrit : > 1. With all the following conditions: >1.1 auto=true >1.2 no priority defined by me >1.3 dhcp server supplies the host and domain names >1.4 d-i netcfg/get_hostname string foo and >d-i netcfg/get_domain st

Re: Problems and questions with preseeding

2013-04-14 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Brian Potkin, le Mon 08 Apr 2013 14:10:52 +0100, a écrit : > The documentation is concise and accurate. However, it was written for > Etch. Not only. Remember that only a couple of archs have a graphical boot menu. Others still have the pure-text boot prompt. > we will recollect that a us

Bug#704748: Not a practical issue (could even be considered a feature...:-))

2013-04-14 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 14/04/13 11:03, Christian PERRIER wrote: > As a consequence, having the desktop-gnome task broken on kFreeBSD > because of the dependency on n-m-gnome can be considered as non > release critical... Just for the record, I'm not happy about this. Why could this not have been fixed in any case, i

Bug#704748: Not a practical issue (could even be considered a feature...:-))

2013-04-14 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 14/04/13 11:03, Christian PERRIER wrote: > According to the thread that follows > https://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2013/04/msg4.html, Gnome is > too broken on kFreeBSD to be considered useful. "Oops, an error occurred" is known as the GNOME 'fail whale'. It could happen also on GNU/Linu

Processed: Not a practical issue (could even be considered a feature...:-))

2013-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 704748 important Bug #704748 [src:tasksel] task-gnome-desktop: uninstallable on kfreebsd-* Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 704748: http://bugs.de

Bug#704748: Not a practical issue (could even be considered a feature...:-))

2013-04-14 Thread Christian PERRIER
severity 704748 important thanks According to the thread that follows https://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2013/04/msg4.html, Gnome is too broken on kFreeBSD to be considered useful. As a consequence, having the desktop-gnome task broken on kFreeBSD because of the dependency on n-m-gnome can b

Bug#694344: marked as done (installation-report: Wheezy beta set up on FSC Futro S400)

2013-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Apr 2013 10:43:16 +0200 with message-id <20130414104316.5986550c@osrdii.lokal> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #694344, regarding installation-report: Wheezy beta set up on FSC Futro S400 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#694344: One more installation done on this machine, boot-problems fixed

2013-04-14 Thread Andreas Glaeser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 please see attached draft installation-report.txt.gz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlFqakgACgkQ5+rBHyUt5wtBlACgkI1+QwmjLAFtGlDC3qlpQckY gt4AoI7h+91cMcsJldP0xNcTAQDZrAS2 =Cs5A -END PGP SIGNATURE-