Hi,
Karsten Merker wrote:
> If there are no objections, I would start working on the
> installation guide and remove (and in some cases replace) several
> outdated parts. Due to limited time available on my side this
One note:
in the d-i manual,
... should be used instead of "..." for
quotation
Quoting dagrut (dag...@yahoo.fr):
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> The "Reunion island" time zone is missing in the "Indian Ocean" section.
> After the installation, dpkg-reconfigure tzdata fixed it.
Please be more specific. There is no place where one cho
Well, I know there *is* a Git commit to set it to xfce instead of gnome,
but I don't know how authoritative or influential it will end up being. I
also like the idea of compressing/trimming GNOME. Thanks for the feedback.
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=tasksel/tasksel.git;a=commit;h=2a962cc
Le mardi 11 septembre 2012 à 11:03 -0400, Lennart Sorensen a écrit :
> If I can't find how to maximize a window, how to logout, or much of
> anything else in the first 5 minutes of use, then it isn't usable.
>
> Of course this is probably getting off topic for debian-boot and almost
> debian-deve
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:47:34PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> It is the same codebase, and has the same functionality.
It is the same source code tree, with a bunch of code completely changed,
and it certainly does not have the same functionality (although it may
be slowly gaining some of wh
Le mardi 11 septembre 2012 à 10:34 -0400, Lennart Sorensen a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:23:09PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > You can’t be serious. Xfce is way more different from GNOME 2 than GNOME
> > 3 classic is.
>
> Well if gnome 3 classic was the default, then fine. But gn
Le mardi 11 septembre 2012 à 10:32 -0400, Lennart Sorensen a écrit :
> Well as a user, gnome-panel 3.x is NOT a continuation of gnome.
It is the same codebase, and has the same functionality.
> When gnome 3 hit unstable, I switched to something else. I couldn't
> find anything, or make it do an
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:23:09PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> You can’t be serious. Xfce is way more different from GNOME 2 than GNOME
> 3 classic is.
Well if gnome 3 classic was the default, then fine. But gnome 3 with
the new panel as default is really not acceptable and just plain mean
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 01:52:44PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Just because these people are noisy doesn’t make them numerous.
>
> Furthermore, Debian (and Ubuntu too IIRC) makes “GNOME classic”
> available right from the login manager, with the default installation.
> Not considering gnome-p
On 11 September 2012 08:06, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Based on this, I think there is at the very least no reason to
> reverse the decision to switch the Debian default to xfce.
Except as Paul said, the decision to make XFCE default for Wheezy has
not been made so it can't be reversed.
Jeremy Bicha
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 03:57 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> > My main concern with doing this on the kernel side is that it will
> > eventually fall foul of the attempts to reduce everything to a single
> > kernel image, since the code will necessarily be quite kirkwood spe
Le mardi 11 septembre 2012 à 13:06 +0100, Ian Jackson a écrit :
> I have encountered numerous people who have been complained (not in
> particular to me, just i general) about changes to GNOME. Not being a
> GNOME user myself I don't really appreciate these complaints.
> However, I have observed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 686927 -1
Bug #686927 [installation-reports] installation does not detect existing Lubuntu
Bug 686927 cloned as bug 687286
> retitle 686927 unable to install grub into any partition
Bug #686927 [installation-reports] installation does not de
Josselin Mouette writes ("Re: CD1 without a network mirror isn't sufficient to
install a full desktop environment"):
> Le lundi 10 septembre 2012 à 20:08 +0200, Karsten Merker a écrit :
> > I am not going to repeat all the discussions about GNOME 3, but
> > at least from the impressions I have go
Eugeniy Meshcheryakov, le Tue 11 Sep 2012 13:09:04 +0200, a écrit :
> > French is not a pure ascii language, precisely.
> >
> > > I was using UTF-8 locale and everything was looking correctly.
> >
> > Because you happened to use a UTF-8 locale. If you connect from a latin1
> > terminal, accents w
Le lundi 10 septembre 2012 à 20:08 +0200, Karsten Merker a écrit :
> I am not going to repeat all the discussions about GNOME 3, but
> at least from the impressions I have gotten around here, many
> previous GNOME 2 users seem not to consider GNOME 3 / GNOME shell
> a continuation of their existin
--- Оригінальне повідомлення ---
> Eugeniy Meshcheryakov, le Tue 11 Sep 2012 11:03:59 +0200, a écrit :
> > Well, those pure ascii languages still use UTF-8.
> > Look at French for example.
>
> French is not a pure ascii language, precisely.
>
> > I was using UTF-8 locale and everything was looki
Ian Campbell wrote:
> My main concern with doing this on the kernel side is that it will
> eventually fall foul of the attempts to reduce everything to a single
> kernel image, since the code will necessarily be quite kirkwood specific
> and run very early on.
Is it possible to do something reaso
Eugeniy Meshcheryakov, le Tue 11 Sep 2012 11:03:59 +0200, a écrit :
> Well, those pure ascii languages still use UTF-8.
> Look at French for example.
French is not a pure ascii language, precisely.
> I was using UTF-8 locale and everything was looking correctly.
Because you happened to use a UTF
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 23:09 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On Aug 30, 2012, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> > I've just tried injecting the following onto the head of the zImage (in
> > a similar manner to flash-kernel's set_machine_id function):
> [...]
> > This works around the issue on my
Well, those pure ascii languages still use UTF-8.
Look at French for example. I was using UTF-8 locale
and everything was looking correctly. I think many
languages in the list will not be shown correctly
if one uses ssh on a latin1 console.
--- Оригінальне повідомлення ---
> Eugeniy Meshcheryakov,
Eugeniy Meshcheryakov, le Mon 10 Sep 2012 23:42:45 +0200, a écrit :
> Currently localechooser detects network-console as a terminal without
> framebuffer and uses languagelevel 1 for such installs. It should use
> higher level, because most modern ssh clients support unicode, and
> in any case d-i
Hi,
I attached patch to one of the previous messages for detecting network-console
installs.
Regards,
Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
--- Оригінальне повідомлення ---
> Quoting Debian Bug Tracking System (ow...@bugs.debian.org):
> > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> >
> > > reassign 687
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The "Reunion island" time zone is missing in the "Indian Ocean" section.
After the installation, dpkg-reconfigure tzdata fixed it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
A
24 matches
Mail list logo
