Josselin Mouette writes ("Re: CD1 without a network mirror isn't sufficient to install a full desktop environment"): > Le lundi 10 septembre 2012 à 20:08 +0200, Karsten Merker a écrit : > > I am not going to repeat all the discussions about GNOME 3, but > > at least from the impressions I have gotten around here, many > > previous GNOME 2 users seem not to consider GNOME 3 / GNOME shell > > a continuation of their existing environment, but instead see it > > as a radical break, effectively as a different desktop > > environment, and a lot of them seem to have adopted XFCE as the > > "heir" of GNOME 2. > > Just because these people are noisy doesn’t make them numerous.
I have encountered numerous people who have been complained (not in particular to me, just i general) about changes to GNOME. Not being a GNOME user myself I don't really appreciate these complaints. However, I have observed that these complainants have generally been told by their peers to switch to xfce and been broadly satisfied with the results. I haven't seen anyone in my social circles praise these changes as good for them. Based on this, I think there is at the very least no reason to reverse the decision to switch the Debian default to xfce. > Furthermore, Debian (and Ubuntu too IIRC) makes “GNOME classic” > available right from the login manager, with the default installation. > Not considering gnome-panel 3.x a continuation of the existing > environment is purely bad faith. Please do not accuse fellow contributors of bad faith. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20559.10558.139040.633...@chiark.greenend.org.uk