Bug#655841: data point

2012-07-15 Thread Joey Hess
As another data point, I am in an airport (CLT) and had to remove gnash since it failed to display the thing needed to get on free wifi. Of course without flash the site lets you right through. -- see shy jo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "un

Debian installer build: failed or old builds

2012-07-15 Thread Daily build aggregator
Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: armel Jul 15 08:10 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Jul 15 08:10 buildd@ancina

Bug#681734: Failed installation at Detect network hardware

2012-07-15 Thread Don Wright
Package: installation-reports Boot method: USB stick, using Default and Expert install. Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-wheezy-DI-b1-amd64-DVD-1.iso Date: 15-Jul-2012 Machine:Self-built with Biostar TZ68A+ mobo Processor: Intel i5-2500K Mem

Re: netinstall via PXE

2012-07-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Please always keep debian-boot in Cc, otherwise you'll have to expect long delays whenever the only person that you mail is abroad, busy, etc. Ulrich Krause, le Wed 04 Jul 2012 13:11:21 +0200, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault schrieb: > >Ulrich Krause, le Wed 04 Jul 2012 09:43:08 +0200, a écrit

Re: netinstall via PXE

2012-07-15 Thread Ulrich Krause
Samuel Thibault schrieb: Ulrich Krause, le Wed 04 Jul 2012 09:43:08 +0200, a écrit : I just followed the instructions after downloading the files (Debian mirror at ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de). Where exactly? /debian/dists/squeeze/main/installer-i386/current/images/netboot/ Downloaded on Apr

Bug#681691: os-prober and linux-boot-prober fail to mount alternate partition

2012-07-15 Thread Eric Lavarde
Package: os-prober Version: 1.54 Severity: important Hello, very recently, I noticed that update-grub didn't discover Linux Debian installed on other partitions (/dev/sda2) than the current one (/dev/sda1), and I brought the issue down to os-prober which somehow fails to mount /dev/sda2 in order

Bug#415634: The kde-desktop task already has a multimedia player

2012-07-15 Thread Filipus Klutiero
On 2012-07-13 17:56, Christian PERRIER wrote: It installs kde-standard that actually install juk. So there's indeed no need for Yet Another Multimedia Player. If you thing that amarok should replace juk, then please file a bug report against kde-standard. Amarok is not "Yet Another Multimedia

Bug#674994: closed by Christian PERRIER (This bug does not belong to tasksel...)

2012-07-15 Thread Harald Dunkel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Why should the maintainer for a hardware dependent package care for systems _not_ providing the hardware (or different hardware)? This would be unreasonable. It would be much easier if I could simply ignore these packages. But I cannot, since tasksel

Re: Thank you so much for breaking d-i!

2012-07-15 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 15.07.2012 17:37, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jul 15, Bastian Blank wrote: > >> Can you provide the number of the bugreport requesting removal of the >> udeb? However, why is there a udeb called libkmod2-udeb then? > It was discussed on IRC, I think with the busybox maintainer. Well, if think it

Re: Thank you so much for breaking d-i!

2012-07-15 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 16:33:26 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jul 15, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > > This is interesting, because the last time I tried statically linking > > the udeb it was bigger than the dynamic one. > And now I remembered: the udeb is not static because the current udev > (w

Bug#681681: installation-reports: grub-install doesn't install grub to all drives in RAID5 array during install

2012-07-15 Thread Gary Dale
Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? I recently rebuilt my former home server as a test desktop machine using 3 x 500G SATA drives I had lying around. This required

Re: Thank you so much for breaking d-i!

2012-07-15 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jul 15, Marco d'Itri wrote: > This is interesting, because the last time I tried statically linking > the udeb it was bigger than the dynamic one. And now I remembered: the udeb is not static because the current udev (which I failed to package timely, and now may be too late for wheezy...)

Re: d-i manual: document how to create a bootable usb stick

2012-07-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Holger Wansing, le Sat 07 Jul 2012 22:13:24 +0200, a écrit : > Maybe it should be documented that "install-mbr" is included > in the "mbr" Debian package (similar to the sentence about mkdosfs > above)? Indeed, done so. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org wi

Re: Thank you so much for breaking d-i!

2012-07-15 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Mark Hymers (15/07/2012): > At the release / boot team's request, the -udeb and source has been > placed back in unstable for now. I've also re-opened the removal bug. > Once d-i is properly transitioned to kmod, please let us know and > we'll remove it from unstable again. Thanks, appreciated.

Re: Thank you so much for breaking d-i!

2012-07-15 Thread Mark Hymers
On Sun, 15, Jul, 2012 at 03:09:46PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois spoke thus.. > Marco d'Itri (15/07/2012): > > WTF are you talking about? > > Obviously: #681285 At the release / boot team's request, the -udeb and source has been placed back in unstable for now. I've also re-opened the removal bug. On

Re: Thank you so much for breaking d-i!

2012-07-15 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Marco d'Itri (15/07/2012): > It was discussed on IRC, I think with the busybox maintainer. Because of course the busybox maintainer (on IRC) is the right point of contact for anything d-i related? Hint: no. KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Thank you so much for breaking d-i!

2012-07-15 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 15:37:05 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jul 15, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > Can you provide the number of the bugreport requesting removal of the > > udeb? However, why is there a udeb called libkmod2-udeb then? > It was discussed on IRC, I think with the busybox maintain

Re: Thank you so much for breaking d-i!

2012-07-15 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jul 15, Bastian Blank wrote: > Can you provide the number of the bugreport requesting removal of the > udeb? However, why is there a udeb called libkmod2-udeb then? It was discussed on IRC, I think with the busybox maintainer. > > module-init-tools is not coming back, if d-i still needs somet

Re: Thank you so much for breaking d-i!

2012-07-15 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 03:05:17PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > WTF are you talking about? We switched from module-init-tools to kmod > months ago, and the last time I discussed d-i and modules with > debian-boot people my understanding was that modules are now loaded by > busybox. Can you prov

Re: Thank you so much for breaking d-i!

2012-07-15 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Marco d'Itri (15/07/2012): > WTF are you talking about? Obviously: #681285 KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Thank you so much for breaking d-i!

2012-07-15 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! On 15.07.2012 14:59, Cyril Brulebois wrote: thanks to the totally uncoordinated switch from module-init-tools to kmod, d-i is badly broken. We're in freeze, neither debian-boot or debian-release were contacted, that's a huge success! Please unfuck this. And make sure you contact debian-boo

Re: Thank you so much for breaking d-i!

2012-07-15 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jul 15, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > thanks to the totally uncoordinated switch from module-init-tools to > kmod, d-i is badly broken. We're in freeze, neither debian-boot or > debian-release were contacted, that's a huge success! WTF are you talking about? We switched from module-init-tools to km

Thank you so much for breaking d-i!

2012-07-15 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, thanks to the totally uncoordinated switch from module-init-tools to kmod, d-i is badly broken. We're in freeze, neither debian-boot or debian-release were contacted, that's a huge success! Please unfuck this. And make sure you contact debian-boot@ for any further udeb addition or removal. N

Bug#681656: Detect Network Hardware stops Wheezy install

2012-07-15 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > David Smith (15/07/2012): > > However, the Wheezy installer stops at Detecting Network Hardware.. > > The mouse cursor can freely move around the screen and it looks like > > the installer doesn't try to detect any network hardware (no progress > > bar!). > > please

Bug#681656: Detect Network Hardware stops Wheezy install

2012-07-15 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hello, David Smith (15/07/2012): > However, the Wheezy installer stops at Detecting Network Hardware.. > The mouse cursor can freely move around the screen and it looks like > the installer doesn't try to detect any network hardware (no progress > bar!). > > Here are 3 screenshots.. > http://img

Bug#681656: Detect Network Hardware stops Wheezy install

2012-07-15 Thread David Smith
Package: debian-installer Version: 20120508 Just grabbed this ISO image: debian-wheezy-DI-b1-i386-kde-CD-1.jigdo Which is dated 15-JUL-2012 via Jigdo (verified Checksum as ok) System is curre

Bug#680668: Updating chinese-t-desktop in tasksel for Wheezy.

2012-07-15 Thread Shih-Yuan Lee (FourDollars)
Hi Andrew, Could you point out which features of ibus-chewing are not expected? I would like to fix them. Regards, $4 On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Andrew Lee wrote: > 2012/7/14 Christian PERRIER : > > ibus-chewing, > > I tested ibus-chewing on my computer. It doesn't have some feat