On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 08:29 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
>
> > That leaves us with the follow list which need categorising:
>
> I didn't see "eject" which is providing a udeb that's used by D-I (to
> allow for a menu entry to eject the CD f
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
> That leaves us with the follow list which need categorising:
I didn't see "eject" which is providing a udeb that's used by D-I (to
allow for a menu entry to eject the CD from its tray).
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
> Just some informations:
>
> Adam D. Barratt, le Mon 25 Jun 2012 21:42:23 +0100, a écrit :
> > alsa-{base,driver,lib,utils}
> > espeakup
>
> These are for software speech support.
And we can probably say that espeakup is "under D-I team control",
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jun 22 17:47 debian-cd@pettersson Dsource
http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/Dsource
* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jun 25 04:52 debian-cd@pettersson Dsource
Oops, I forget CC the mailing list, Forwarding.
El lun, 25-06-2012 a las 16:22 +0200, Matthias Richerzhagen escribió:
> Hello,
>
> As i have no optical drive in my Computer and i didn't wanted to invest
> time to get a boot USB stick running i decided to use the debian
> installer from goodby-mic
Just some informations:
Adam D. Barratt, le Mon 25 Jun 2012 21:42:23 +0100, a écrit :
> alsa-{base,driver,lib,utils}
> espeakup
These are for software speech support.
> netdde
This is hurd-only, and contains the network drivers.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.d
Julien Cristau (25/06/2012):
> > Questions:
> > A. if we build a debian-installer package against the old linux kernel
> > ABI, and then images with that debian-installer, will the installer
> > be able to install a kernel with the old ABI to begin with, *and* a
> > kernel with the ne
Hi,
In anticipation of the block-udeb hints being re-enabled, I've been
reviewing the currently commented hints and comparing them to the
packages in the archive which currently produce udebs.
For those packages which were not previously in the list, I've made a
few assumptions, detailed below.
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 23:54:18 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Questions:
> A. if we build a debian-installer package against the old linux kernel
> ABI, and then images with that debian-installer, will the installer
> be able to install a kernel with the old ABI to begin with, *and* a
Is there a fix for this?
I am tearing out my hair to find an answer to this seemingly widespread issue.
Thank you respectfully
T.
Sent from my iPhone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
floppy-retriever | 1.17 | source, all
load-floppy | 1.17 | all
--- Reason ---
ROM; obsolete
--
Note
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
lenny-support | 0.04 | source, all
--- Reason ---
ROM; obsolete
--
Note that the package(s) have simply b
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
rootskel-gtk | 1.23 | s390x
--- Reason ---
ROM; not supported on s390(x)
--
Note that the package(s) have
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 678943 debian-installer 20120508
Bug #678943 [espeakup-udeb] espeakup-udeb uninstallable: depends on libgcc1
can't be satisfied
Bug reassigned from package 'espeakup-udeb' to 'debian-installer'.
No longer marked as found in versions espe
reassign 678943 debian-installer 20120508
retitle 678943 debian-installer: FTBFS with foreign libgcc1 installed
thanks
Cyril Brulebois (25/06/2012):
> Cyril Brulebois (25/06/2012):
> > Package: espeakup-udeb
> > Version: 1:0.71-8
> > Severity: grave
> > Tags: d-i
> > Justification: renders pack
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 07:42:40PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Adam D. Barratt
> wrote:
> > If nothing provides scsi-modules on arm*, the open-iscsi-udeb needs to not
> > depend on it on those architecture. I don't know enough about the packages
> > off-hand
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On 25.06.2012 13:56, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>
>> This is holding open-iscsi's propagation to Wheezy. Please advise
>> what should be done.
>>
>
> Well, fixing:
>
> * open-iscsi-udeb/armel unsatisfiable Depends: scsi-modules
>>
On 25.06.2012 13:56, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
This is holding open-iscsi's propagation to Wheezy. Please advise
what should be done.
Well, fixing:
* open-iscsi-udeb/armel unsatisfiable Depends: scsi-modules
* open-iscsi-udeb/armhf unsatisfiable Depends: scsi-modules
would se
This is holding open-iscsi's propagation to Wheezy. Please advise what
should be done.
http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=open-iscsi
Excuse for open-iscsi
* 33 days old (needed 10 days)
* open-iscsi-udeb/armel unsatisfiable Depends: scsi-modules
* open-iscsi-udeb/armhf unsatisfi
19 matches
Mail list logo
