On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 07:42:40PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Adam D. Barratt > <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk>wrote: > > If nothing provides scsi-modules on arm*, the open-iscsi-udeb needs to not > > depend on it on those architecture. I don't know enough about the packages > > off-hand to be sure whether that by extension means that open-iscsi-udeb > > may not make sense on arm* at all. > I will. That's the last resort. :-) > > Just that I'm not aware of the provider of scsi-modules in D-I.
It's provided by scsi-modules-* udebs, which are built by the kernel packaging. > Colin: This patch came from you. Do you have any comments? Your intent with > the patch was to provide iscsi root installation support in D-I. There's only any point in building open-iscsi-udeb on architectures that ship iscsi_tcp.ko in a udeb, or have it built into their kernel. According to build logs and Contents-udeb-*, that's currently: amd64 i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc I would probably be inclined not to bother building open-iscsi-udeb on ARM, but, if you're going to do so, the kernel packaging needs to be changed to build and ship this module. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120625142913.gi15...@riva.dynamic.greenend.org.uk
