Quoting Jonathan Nieder (jrnie...@gmail.com):
> First, thanks very much for writing. Let's get this fixed. :)
>
> As for your question, the short answer is: I don't know. I can
> provide an updated kernel to test (and would be very interested in the
> result), but I do not know how to tell the
Customer uses 64bit debian (intel x86-64 cpu, E5-26xx).
Gator
Sent from Android phone.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Nieder [mailto:jrnie...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 07:24 PM GMT Standard Time
To: Yin, Gator
Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org; 666...@bugs.debi
thank you. where can i download the updated kernel?
Thanks,
Gator
Sent from Android phone.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Nieder [mailto:jrnie...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 07:08 PM GMT Standard Time
To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Cc: Yin, Gator; 666...@bugs.
gator_...@dell.com wrote:
> thank you. where can i download the updated kernel?
I'll build one. Is the customer using the 32-bit (i386) or 64-bit
(amd64) version of the OS?
Here are instructions for building a patched kernel on the same kind
of Debian system, from a directory containing the twe
Hi,
gator_...@dell.com wrote[1]:
> My customer just bought a PowerEdge R620 with H710, and their OS is
> Debian 6.0. they failed to install Debian 6.0 on R620. I searched
> Debian bugs, and found this bug was fixed.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666108
>
> I have poor linux s
On 08.06.2012 15:22, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 03:10:42PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> On 08.06.2012 14:52, maximilian attems wrote:
>>> dude care to have a bit of patience before reassigning back,
>>> that be really nice.
>>
>> I gave a few days, maybe it was too few,
On 08.06.2012 15:28, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:59:26PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> [Adding debian-devel@ to the Cc list]
>>
>> Short story (and it is short): the bug has been filed
>> against initramfs-tools initially, it is about how
>> /proc and /sys filesystem sh
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:59:26PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> [Adding debian-devel@ to the Cc list]
>
> Short story (and it is short): the bug has been filed
> against initramfs-tools initially, it is about how
> /proc and /sys filesystem should be handled in initramfs
> when switching to new
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 03:10:42PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 08.06.2012 14:52, maximilian attems wrote:
> > dude care to have a bit of patience before reassigning back,
> > that be really nice.
>
> I gave a few days, maybe it was too few, I dunno.
>
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:45:59AM
On 08.06.2012 14:52, maximilian attems wrote:
> dude care to have a bit of patience before reassigning back,
> that be really nice.
I gave a few days, maybe it was too few, I dunno.
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:45:59AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
>> I disagree it is a busybox problem, and do
On 08.06.2012 14:59, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
> Wonderful.
>
> I asked you nicely a) to stop reassigning without explanation,
> and b) to provide some comments about why do you think it is
> a busybox isue, at the same time providing my reasoning why
> it is not.
Ok. This was premature. Someho
[Adding debian-devel@ to the Cc list]
Short story (and it is short): the bug has been filed
against initramfs-tools initially, it is about how
/proc and /sys filesystem should be handled in initramfs
when switching to new root. Original reporter included
a trivial patch for initramfs that does re
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 676001 - patch
Bug #676001 [busybox] initramfs-tools: busybox's switch_root doesn't handle
/proc or /sys moving
Removed tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
676001: http://bugs.debia
dude care to have a bit of patience before reassigning back,
that be really nice.
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:45:59AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 05.06.2012 00:45, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> >
> >> reassign 676001 busybox
> > Bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 676001 busybox
Bug #676001 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: busybox's switch_root doesn't
handle /proc or /sys moving
Bug reassigned from package 'initramfs-tools' to 'busybox'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #676001 t
15 matches
Mail list logo