Re: Bug#666108: Failed to Install Debian 6.0 on Dell PERC H710P

2012-06-08 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Jonathan Nieder (jrnie...@gmail.com): > First, thanks very much for writing. Let's get this fixed. :) > > As for your question, the short answer is: I don't know. I can > provide an updated kernel to test (and would be very interested in the > result), but I do not know how to tell the

RE: Failed to Install Debian 6.0 on Dell PERC H710P

2012-06-08 Thread Gator_Yin
Customer uses 64bit debian (intel x86-64 cpu, E5-26xx). Gator Sent from Android phone. -Original Message- From: Jonathan Nieder [mailto:jrnie...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 07:24 PM GMT Standard Time To: Yin, Gator Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org; 666...@bugs.debi

RE: Failed to Install Debian 6.0 on Dell PERC H710P

2012-06-08 Thread Gator_Yin
thank you. where can i download the updated kernel? Thanks, Gator Sent from Android phone. -Original Message- From: Jonathan Nieder [mailto:jrnie...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 07:08 PM GMT Standard Time To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org Cc: Yin, Gator; 666...@bugs.

Re: Failed to Install Debian 6.0 on Dell PERC H710P

2012-06-08 Thread Jonathan Nieder
gator_...@dell.com wrote: > thank you. where can i download the updated kernel? I'll build one. Is the customer using the 32-bit (i386) or 64-bit (amd64) version of the OS? Here are instructions for building a patched kernel on the same kind of Debian system, from a directory containing the twe

Re: Failed to Install Debian 6.0 on Dell PERC H710P

2012-06-08 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, gator_...@dell.com wrote[1]: > My customer just bought a PowerEdge R620 with H710, and their OS is > Debian 6.0. they failed to install Debian 6.0 on R620. I searched > Debian bugs, and found this bug was fixed. > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666108 > > I have poor linux s

Bug#676001: Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 08.06.2012 15:22, maximilian attems wrote: > On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 03:10:42PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> On 08.06.2012 14:52, maximilian attems wrote: >>> dude care to have a bit of patience before reassigning back, >>> that be really nice. >> >> I gave a few days, maybe it was too few,

Re: Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 08.06.2012 15:28, maximilian attems wrote: > On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:59:26PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> [Adding debian-devel@ to the Cc list] >> >> Short story (and it is short): the bug has been filed >> against initramfs-tools initially, it is about how >> /proc and /sys filesystem sh

Re: Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:59:26PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > [Adding debian-devel@ to the Cc list] > > Short story (and it is short): the bug has been filed > against initramfs-tools initially, it is about how > /proc and /sys filesystem should be handled in initramfs > when switching to new

Bug#676001: Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 03:10:42PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > On 08.06.2012 14:52, maximilian attems wrote: > > dude care to have a bit of patience before reassigning back, > > that be really nice. > > I gave a few days, maybe it was too few, I dunno. > > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:45:59AM

Bug#676001: Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 08.06.2012 14:52, maximilian attems wrote: > dude care to have a bit of patience before reassigning back, > that be really nice. I gave a few days, maybe it was too few, I dunno. > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:45:59AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: [] >> I disagree it is a busybox problem, and do

Re: Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 08.06.2012 14:59, Michael Tokarev wrote: [] > Wonderful. > > I asked you nicely a) to stop reassigning without explanation, > and b) to provide some comments about why do you think it is > a busybox isue, at the same time providing my reasoning why > it is not. Ok. This was premature. Someho

Re: Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
[Adding debian-devel@ to the Cc list] Short story (and it is short): the bug has been filed against initramfs-tools initially, it is about how /proc and /sys filesystem should be handled in initramfs when switching to new root. Original reporter included a trivial patch for initramfs that does re

Processed: tagging 676001

2012-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 676001 - patch Bug #676001 [busybox] initramfs-tools: busybox's switch_root doesn't handle /proc or /sys moving Removed tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 676001: http://bugs.debia

Bug#676001: Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-08 Thread maximilian attems
dude care to have a bit of patience before reassigning back, that be really nice. On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:45:59AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > On 05.06.2012 00:45, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > > > >> reassign 676001 busybox > > Bug

Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 676001 busybox Bug #676001 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: busybox's switch_root doesn't handle /proc or /sys moving Bug reassigned from package 'initramfs-tools' to 'busybox'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #676001 t