[Adding debian-devel@ to the Cc list] Short story (and it is short): the bug has been filed against initramfs-tools initially, it is about how /proc and /sys filesystem should be handled in initramfs when switching to new root. Original reporter included a trivial patch for initramfs that does re-mounting of these filesystems. Max reassigned it to busybox without giving any reasonings or comments whatsoever. I explained that it is none of switch_root business, in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676001#24 , and asked to not reassign bugs without giving a word of explanation. After a few days of inactivity I reassigned this bug back to initramfs, per my explanation. Now max reassigned it back.
On 08.06.2012 14:49, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > >> reassign 676001 busybox > Bug #676001 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: busybox's switch_root doesn't > handle /proc or /sys moving > Bug reassigned from package 'initramfs-tools' to 'busybox'. Wonderful. I asked you nicely a) to stop reassigning without explanation, and b) to provide some comments about why do you think it is a busybox isue, at the same time providing my reasoning why it is not. After you failed to provide any comments, I reassigned it back to initramfs-tools. And you, 2nd time in a row, does the same: reassigning it back to bysubox (where, as I described before, it does not belong to), and gives neither explanation nor any comments/answers to my reasoning. So I've no other "solution" but to tag this as wontfix in busybox, because I think it is not where it should be fixed, as per my previous explanation. Mind you, this "solution" does not help users at all. /mjt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd1db0e.6040...@msgid.tls.msk.ru
