(CC'ing you as I answer quite late and you might miss the answer. No
need to CC me back)
Quoting Thibaut Girka (t...@sitedethib.com):
> > If you want to try, I can build an image for x86/qemu right now.
>
> "Right now"... well, here it is, but be patient, it's behind my home
> connection!
> http
Your message dated Sat, 04 Sep 2010 05:32:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#589579: fixed in base-installer 1.110
has caused the Debian Bug report #589579,
regarding debian-installer: i386 kernel flavour selection is poor
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Accepted:
base-installer_1.110.dsc
to main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.110.dsc
base-installer_1.110.tar.gz
to main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.110.tar.gz
base-installer_1.110_all.udeb
to main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.110_all.udeb
bootstrap-base_1.110_i386.udeb
to mai
base-installer_1.110_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_1.110.dsc
base-installer_1.110.tar.gz
base-installer_1.110_all.udeb
bootstrap-base_1.110_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
base-installer_1.110_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
base-installer_1.110.dsc
base-installer_1.110.tar.gz
base-installer_1.110_all.udeb
bootstrap-base_1.110_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debia
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 589579 base-installer
Bug #589579 [base-installer] debian-installer: i386 kernel flavour selection is
poor
Ignoring request to reassign bug #589579 to the same package
> tags 589579 pending
Bug #589579 [base-installer] debian-installer:
reassign 589579 base-installer
tags 589579 pending
thanks
Quoting Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk):
> Please apply this patch.
>
> I've just raised the severity to 'important'; I think problem 1 is
> serious enough to justify that.
>
> Ben.
Applied
signature.asc
Description: Digital sig
Please apply this patch.
I've just raised the severity to 'important'; I think problem 1 is
serious enough to justify that.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 589579 important
Bug #589579 [base-installer] debian-installer: i386 kernel flavour selection is
poor
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
589579: ht
Hi,
You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for
debconf. The English template has been changed, and now some messages
are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing.
I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it.
Please send the updated file to me, or
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 595363 installation-reports
Bug #595363 [installation-reports] sparc64 'Testing' - keyboard frozen on
install
Ignoring request to reassign bug #595363 to the same package
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
Package: sparc install iso: 'Debian Squeeze xfce+lxde-CD Binary 1'
Version: 20100830-07:42
CD boots OK.
Keyboard frozen upon 1st installation screen & requires hard power-off to
recover.
iso:
name: 'debian-testing-sparc-xfce+lxde-CD-1.iso'
location: 'http://hammurabi.acc.umu.se/cdimag
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD network
Image version: Date: 03.09.2010 at 21H00
Machine: MVWareProcessor: MVWare
Memory: MVWare
Partitions: MVWare
Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn):
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't
Your message dated Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:24:11 -0300
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#573429: installation-reports: some characters screwed
up in menus + windoze detected but omitted from grub menu
has caused the Debian Bug report #573429,
regarding installation-reports: some characters scr
Guys:
I'm considering adapting the installer (well, partman I guess) to work
on a non-x86, embedded platform I have here. The platform uses UBIFS
as the root filesystem, in NAND flash. The presentation is similar to
what the GuruPlug guys have to deal with.
For now, my objective is a fully-pre
I have the same problem using:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_alpha1/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
- 17-Feb-2010 23:19 161M
and
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_alpha1/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-businesscard.iso
- 17-Feb-2010 23:17 25M
combine
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:35:08 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Thanks, lets see who the next iteration goes...
>
Most likely like the previous ones, e.g.
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/20100826-00:06/
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 11:58 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 11:03:44AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 22:15:58 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 10:41 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 09:23:59 +0100, Ian
===
= ПРАКТИКА ТОРГОВОЙ И ИНВЕСТИЦИОННОЙ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ =
= В ГЕРМАНИИ И СТРАНАХ ЕВРОПЕЙСКОГО СОЮЗА =
===
Бизнес в Германии - 10 пр
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 11:03:44AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 22:15:58 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 10:41 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 09:23:59 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > I can't see any historical version of
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 22:14:20 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Julien Cristau suggested in
> <20100902084123.gh6...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> (from thread "Daily
> builds still failing") this morning that it was likely to be the result
> of the buildd maintainer debugging an issue of some sort.
The
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 22:15:58 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 10:41 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 09:23:59 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >
> > > I can't see any historical version of util/get-packages in SVN which has
> > > the echo+gpg+cp commands
22 matches
Mail list logo
