Quoting Paul Wise (p...@debian.org):
> Hi all,
>
> Would it be possible to unblock busybox? It has been waiting for 117
> days with no RC bugs. If it is not unblocked then there will be no
> udhcpc/udhcpc packages in squeeze (there were in lenny).
>
> [I'm subscribed to -release, no need to CC]
On Saturday 19 June 2010, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> cleanup () {
> + rm -f /target/var/cache/apt/archives/*.deb 2>/dev/null || true
> rm -f "$KERNEL_LIST" "$KERNEL_LIST.unfiltered"
> }
Shouldn't this call 'apt-get cleanup' in /target instead?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-b
Hi all,
Would it be possible to unblock busybox? It has been waiting for 117
days with no RC bugs. If it is not unblocked then there will be no
udhcpc/udhcpc packages in squeeze (there were in lenny).
[I'm subscribed to -release, no need to CC]
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Intel 82578DM network card is not recognized by Squeeze d-i.
Motherboard: Zotac H55ITX-A-E
The card works just fine in Sid though getting it tested required Debian
installation on the disk in a different system followed by some
post-ins
[Martin Michlmayr]
> I've done it after you get the "Installation complete" message.
> Can you confirm that this is late enough?
Yes. The last Debian Edu script is at 13debian-edu-profile-udeb
before the installation complete message. The LTSP build is done in
its own udeb between pkgsel and fin
* Petter Reinholdtsen [2010-06-19 19:42]:
> See my comment in #586434. If it is done, please make sure it is done
> as late as possible. Doing it late in finish-install.d should not as
> far as I can see affect the Debian Edu installation, while doing it
> earlier will.
I've done it after you g
[Martin Michlmayr]
> I see no reason for leaving .deb files in /var/cache/apt/archives on
> a fresh installation, so let's run apt-get clean before reboot.
>
> OK to apply?
See my comment in #586434. If it is done, please make sure it is done
as late as possible. Doing it late in finish-install
[Martin Michlmayr]
> Is there a reason why base-installer doesn't clear the apt cache
> after installing base? I end up with about 70 MB of .debs in
> /var/cache/apt/archives and this hurts on machines with little space
> (such as machines with only 512 MB flash storage).
When Debian Edu set up
Hello Martion,
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: base-installer
> Version: 1.107
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Is there a reason why base-installer doesn't clear the apt cache after
> installing base? I end up with about 70 MB of .debs in
> /var/cache/
Hello Martin,
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: finish-install
> Version: 2.23
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> I see no reason for leaving .deb files in /var/cache/apt/archives on a
> fresh installation, so let's run apt-get clean before reboot.
>
> OK to
Package: finish-install
Version: 2.23
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
I see no reason for leaving .deb files in /var/cache/apt/archives on a
fresh installation, so let's run apt-get clean before reboot.
OK to apply?
Index: finish-install.d/30cleanup
==
* Bastian Blank [2010-04-28 12:03]:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 11:09:56PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > - 1GiB is not longer sufficient as /var as the to be installed packages
> > are already larger. However there is no clear error shown after
> > aptitude via tasksel (why does it need aptitu
Package: base-installer
Version: 1.107
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Is there a reason why base-installer doesn't clear the apt cache after
installing base? I end up with about 70 MB of .debs in
/var/cache/apt/archives and this hurts on machines with little space
(such as machines with only 512
Package: base-installer
Version: 1.107
Severity: wishlist
dpkg in git has support for filtering files, i.e. a mechanism by which
you can exclude certain files from being installed (e.g.
/usr/share/doc, man pages). This is useful on embedded devices that
don't have much storage.
I believe this fe
Accepted:
flash-kernel-installer_2.31_armel.udeb
to main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel-installer_2.31_armel.udeb
flash-kernel_2.31.dsc
to main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.31.dsc
flash-kernel_2.31.tar.gz
to main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.31.tar.gz
flash-kernel_2.31_armel.deb
to main/f
flash-kernel_2.31_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
flash-kernel_2.31.dsc
flash-kernel_2.31.tar.gz
flash-kernel_2.31_armel.deb
flash-kernel-installer_2.31_armel.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To
Accepted:
libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.74_amd64.udeb
to
main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.74_amd64.udeb
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.74_amd64.deb
to main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.74_amd64.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.74_amd64
Accepted:
flash-kernel-installer_2.30_armel.udeb
to main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel-installer_2.30_armel.udeb
flash-kernel_2.30.dsc
to main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.30.dsc
flash-kernel_2.30.tar.gz
to main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.30.tar.gz
flash-kernel_2.30_armel.deb
to main/f
libdebian-installer_0.74_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libdebian-installer_0.74.dsc
libdebian-installer_0.74.tar.gz
libdebian-installer4_0.74_amd64.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.74_amd64.deb
libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.74_amd64.udeb
libdebian-in
flash-kernel_2.30_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
flash-kernel_2.30.dsc
flash-kernel_2.30.tar.gz
flash-kernel_2.30_armel.deb
flash-kernel-installer_2.30_armel.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To
Here is the section concerning F13 in debian's grub2 config:
# grep -A10 -i fedora /boot/grub/grub.cfg
menuentry "Fedora (2.6.33.3-85.fc13.i686.PAE) (on /dev/sdb7)" {
insmod part_msdos
insmod ext2
set root='(hd1,msdos7)'
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set e87da235-0
Hello,
After the long silence about the popular bootloader LILO the development
was started again.
The new Homepage can be found here:
http://lilo.alioth.debian.org/
For the development of the bootloader I have started an Alioth project
with Git repository and Mailinglist:
http://alioth.debian.
Here some informations in addition:
# fdisk -l /dev/sdb
Disk /dev/sdb: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 by
23 matches
Mail list logo
