Bug#557605: installation-reports: grub2 installation failure

2009-11-30 Thread Braslau & Rachline
On Monday 23 November 2009 10:41:51 Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Braslau & Rachline wrote: > > > I used the "stable" 5.0.3 version of the debian installer > > to install the "unstable" distribution. This probably explains > > the differences. > > Yes, it explains

Bug#558908: debian-installer: GUI Install fails

2009-11-30 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Carlo Stemberger (carlo.stember...@gmail.com): > Package: debian-installer > Version: daily > Severity: normal > > Here a screenshot: > http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/4075/bimbotuxguiinstall.png .../... which doesn't help for those of us who read mail offline. I really recommend attac

Bug#531646: marked as done ([Debconf] console-setup/model and console-setup/layout require a long description)

2009-11-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:37:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#531646: fixed in console-setup 1.50 has caused the Debian Bug report #531646, regarding [Debconf] console-setup/model and console-setup/layout require a long description to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#558448: marked as done (keyboard-configuration: Does not set right alt correctly.)

2009-11-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:37:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#558475: fixed in console-setup 1.50 has caused the Debian Bug report #558475, regarding keyboard-configuration: Does not set right alt correctly. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#535965: marked as done ([Debconf] It is not clear what is the meaning of "configuration program")

2009-11-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:37:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#535965: fixed in console-setup 1.50 has caused the Debian Bug report #535965, regarding [Debconf] It is not clear what is the meaning of "configuration program" to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#524235: marked as done ([Debconf] The question about AltGr is confusing because 'AltGr' can denote both a physical key on the keyboard and software behaviour of a key)

2009-11-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:37:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#524235: fixed in console-setup 1.50 has caused the Debian Bug report #524235, regarding [Debconf] The question about AltGr is confusing because 'AltGr' can denote both a physical key on the keyboard and softwa

Bug#558229: marked as done (Policy violation §12.3: postinst requires files in /usr/share/doc.)

2009-11-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:37:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#558229: fixed in console-setup 1.50 has caused the Debian Bug report #558229, regarding Policy violation §12.3: postinst requires files in /usr/share/doc. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#558475: marked as done (Doesn't detect that cached.kmap.gz is obsoleted)

2009-11-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:37:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#558448: fixed in console-setup 1.50 has caused the Debian Bug report #558448, regarding Doesn't detect that cached.kmap.gz is obsoleted to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#558448: marked as done (keyboard-configuration: Does not set right alt correctly.)

2009-11-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:37:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#558448: fixed in console-setup 1.50 has caused the Debian Bug report #558448, regarding keyboard-configuration: Does not set right alt correctly. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#539108: marked as done (bdf2psf does not handle empty bitmaps)

2009-11-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:37:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#539108: fixed in console-setup 1.50 has caused the Debian Bug report #539108, regarding bdf2psf does not handle empty bitmaps to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#558475: marked as done (Doesn't detect that cached.kmap.gz is obsoleted)

2009-11-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:37:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#558475: fixed in console-setup 1.50 has caused the Debian Bug report #558475, regarding Doesn't detect that cached.kmap.gz is obsoleted to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#538397: marked as done ([Debconf] It is not clear what is the meaning of "unsupported (settings|options)")

2009-11-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:37:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#538397: fixed in console-setup 1.50 has caused the Debian Bug report #538397, regarding [Debconf] It is not clear what is the meaning of "unsupported (settings|options)" to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#548837: marked as done (FAQ about boot splash programs, svgatextmode and UTF8+Backspace)

2009-11-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:37:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#548837: fixed in console-setup 1.50 has caused the Debian Bug report #548837, regarding FAQ about boot splash programs, svgatextmode and UTF8+Backspace to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#558823: /dev/disk/by-uuid not populated in d-i with RAID

2009-11-30 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Package: installation-reports I installed to an ARM machine today with the daily image and towards the installation there was a hang at: "Configuring flash memory to boot the system: 33%". Looking at /var/log/syslog showed that flash-kernel's initramfs hook waited for user input because the UUID

Processing of console-setup_1.50_i386.changes

2009-11-30 Thread Archive Administrator
console-setup_1.50_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: console-setup_1.50.dsc console-setup_1.50.tar.gz keyboard-configuration_1.50_all.deb console-setup_1.50_all.deb console-setup-mini_1.50_all.deb bdf2psf_1.50_all.deb console-setup-udeb_1.50_all.ude

Bug#558686: what version of libparted are you using?

2009-11-30 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello, On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Frans Pop wrote: >>     ped_partition_busy: do not call the libparted exception handler > > Thanks for the references. I've read the patch and scanned through the > report, but my impression is that this is a different issue. > Otavio may be a better judge

Bug#558686: what version of libparted are you using?

2009-11-30 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello Jim, On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: > Hello, > > I've just begun reading about this problem, and have a quick question: > What version of libparted are you using? We're using a version just before 1.9.0. > I ask because there have been significant changes in the are

Bug#558686: what version of libparted are you using?

2009-11-30 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 30 November 2009, Jim Meyering wrote: > I've just begun reading about this problem, and have a quick question: > What version of libparted are you using? It's hard to tell exactly. The Debian package has the following version: 1.8.8.git.2009.07.19-5. It's a snapshot from upstream, but we

grub-installer 1.49 MIGRATED to testing

2009-11-30 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the grub-installer source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.47 Current version: 1.49 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receiv

Bug#558467: marked as done (win32-loader: [INTL:ru] Russian program translation update)

2009-11-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:16:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#558467: fixed in win32-loader 0.6.13 has caused the Debian Bug report #558467, regarding win32-loader: [INTL:ru] Russian program translation update to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#545648: marked as done (win32-loader: FTBFS: grub-mkimage: error: cannot stat /usr/lib/grub/i386-pc/pc.mod)

2009-11-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:16:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#545648: fixed in win32-loader 0.6.13 has caused the Debian Bug report #545648, regarding win32-loader: FTBFS: grub-mkimage: error: cannot stat /usr/lib/grub/i386-pc/pc.mod to be marked as done. This means tha

Processing of win32-loader_0.6.13_amd64.changes

2009-11-30 Thread Archive Administrator
win32-loader_0.6.13_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: win32-loader_0.6.13.dsc win32-loader_0.6.13.tar.gz win32-loader_0.6.13_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-

Bug#558780: tzsetup-udeb: choosing Mexico as a country, the time zone spanish translation is incorrect

2009-11-30 Thread Fernando C. Estrada
Package: tzsetup-udeb Severity: minor Tags: l10n pending Hi The detailed information of this bug is in the Spanish l10n list [1] and this is just a reminder that will be closed when the translation is corrected. Regards! [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-spanish/2009/11/msg00127.html --

Bug#558686: what version of libparted are you using?

2009-11-30 Thread Jim Meyering
Hello, I've just begun reading about this problem, and have a quick question: What version of libparted are you using? I ask because there have been significant changes in the area of detecting when partitions are active. In particular: v1.9.0-137-g048602c http://git.debian.org/?p=parted/parted

Re: [SRM] D-I: major update of choose-mirror for stable

2009-11-30 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 28 November 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > The backport is fairly large as some functions needed to be rewritten. I just see that the source tarball for the previous stable update by Otavio (lenny3) included .svn directories. My upload is clean in that regard, but it does make the debdiff

Bug#558679: Another log: /var/log/installer/syslog

2009-11-30 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 30 November 2009, Torsten Landschoff wrote: > Anyway, it should not cause any segfaults. Exactly. > BTW: Why aren't segfaults indicated to the user during > installation? I should have noticed them in syslog, but I think we > should not hide our problems, even in the installer? ;-)) B