Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
> by Holger and myself only these weeks. I still have to process the
> result for June 28th but I don't expect much more signalled spams.
Only 11. Most of them being recent spam from June 2009 (probably
signalled on the fly by -boot readers).
si
Hello
Please, I need some (little) help in some preseeds. I'm searching for this
questions in documentation and I havn't found anything. Would you say if
exist some preseed (or preseeds) to get:
a) Save the installationlog log (/var/log/syslog and partman files) in
some location
b) Change
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 03:05:22PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 28 June 2009, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I think we should stop asking this question entirely. Hardly anyone
> > really needs anything other than pc105, except for the Brazilian and
> > Japanese cases that can be derived automatica
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 01:00:19PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> I would just call it the "American English" layout versus the "Dutch"
> layout. After all, that's what they are.
> And you'd probably need to offer some additional choices:
> - American English layout with € on 5 key
> - American Englis
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello Luk,
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
>> If it's binNMU safe, we could try a binNMU, otherwise it's best to
>> either do a porter NMU if possible or a sourceful upload otherwise.
>
> Yeah, binNMU ought to work fine. Please go ahead with that.
b
Hello,
Christian Perrier, le Sun 28 Jun 2009 19:43:01 +0200, a écrit :
> The general rule would then be: one language, one layoutwith
> exceptions when established practice needs them.
I'd even say, one language/country, one layout. Note for instance
french, for which there are a lot of layou
Hello Luk,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
> If it's binNMU safe, we could try a binNMU, otherwise it's best to
> either do a porter NMU if possible or a sourceful upload otherwise.
Yeah, binNMU ought to work fine. Please go ahead with that.
--
Otavio Salvador
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> Holger and Christian have already started the reviews for the next two
> years: 2004 and 2005.
>
> Detailed info is available from:
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SpamClean
Small update:
2005 has been processed by Holger Wansing and myself (p
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > One of the release goals of Debian Installer for squeeze is dropping
> > the use of console-data keyboard mappings, to replace them by
> > console-setup [1].
>
> Here are (finally) the results of my test
In followup to Frans' review, please find here my current thoughts
about possible ways to greatly simplify things when configuring
console-setup *in D-I* as well as greatly reduce the size impact.
The general idea would be *selecting* a number of model|layout|variant
that are well suited with res
FYI: The status of the linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.32lenny1
Current version: 1.32lenny3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple time
FYI: The status of the linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.8lenny1
Current version: 1.8lenny3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times
FYI: The status of the linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.48lenny1
Current version: 1.48lenny3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple ti
FYI: The status of the linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.41lenny1
Current version: 1.41lenny3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple time
FYI: The status of the linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.76lenny1
Current version: 1.76lenny3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times
FYI: The status of the linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.42lenny1
Current version: 1.42lenny3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times
FYI: The status of the linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.37lenny1
Current version: 0.37lenny3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times
FYI: The status of the linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.9lenny1
Current version: 1.9lenny3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a
FYI: The status of the linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.38lenny1
Current version: 1.38lenny3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times
FYI: The status of the linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.53lenny1
Current version: 1.53lenny3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple time
FYI: The status of the linux-kernel-di-alpha-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.37lenny1
Current version: 0.37lenny3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple time
FYI: The status of the choose-mirror source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.28lenny1
Current version: 2.28lenny3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Accepted:
live-installer_11.dsc
to pool/main/l/live-installer/live-installer_11.dsc
live-installer_11.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/live-installer/live-installer_11.tar.gz
live-installer_11_i386.udeb
to pool/main/l/live-installer/live-installer_11_i386.udeb
Override entries for your package:
live-
live-installer_11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
live-installer_11.dsc
live-installer_11.tar.gz
live-installer_11_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Only for information:
Same behaviour with the actual installer 5.0.2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFKR3fQkmK4ErR8cgQRAuujAKCAGLocN9k5n3zNLpVjXuqs8mw
Frans Pop, le Sun 28 Jun 2009 14:36:25 +0200, a écrit :
> On Sunday 28 June 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > In that case there really _should_ be a "Netherlands - Dvorak" layout
> > > as well.
> >
> > If someone could implement the dutch dvorak, sure. Remember that dvorak
> > is per-language. Yo
On Sunday 28 June 2009, Colin Watson wrote:
> I think we should stop asking this question entirely. Hardly anyone
> really needs anything other than pc105, except for the Brazilian and
> Japanese cases that can be derived automatically from the keyboard
> layout anyway.
How appropriate is pc105 as
On Sunday 28 June 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > In that case there really _should_ be a "Netherlands - Dvorak" layout
> > as well.
>
> If someone could implement the dutch dvorak, sure. Remember that dvorak
> is per-language. You can always use the english dvorak for Dutch, but
> that's not effi
Frans Pop, le Sun 28 Jun 2009 13:45:33 +0200, a écrit :
> On Sunday 28 June 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Frans Pop, le Sun 28 Jun 2009 13:00:19 +0200, a ?crit :
> > > BTW, I would expect there are people in NL using Dvorak, but it's not
> > > being offered as a choice there...
> >
> > Because x
(resending for proper threading)
On Sunday 28 June 2009, you wrote:
> Now _that_ I could understand. The origin question should really only
> be displayed if someone chooses "other" from the country-specific
> variant list.
But even then I find the "origin" prompt confusing, especially because
p
On Sunday 28 June 2009, you wrote:
> Now _that_ I could understand. The origin question should really only
> be displayed if someone chooses "other" from the country-specific
> variant list.
But even then I find the "origin" prompt confusing, especially because
people are used to selecting a layo
On Sunday 28 June 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Frans Pop, le Sun 28 Jun 2009 13:00:19 +0200, a ?crit :
> > BTW, I would expect there are people in NL using Dvorak, but it's not
> > being offered as a choice there...
>
> Because xkb doesn't have that layout.
Do you mean that xkb has a _separate_
Samuel Thibault, le Sun 28 Jun 2009 11:59:26 +0200, a écrit :
> Another way I had thought about would be to first show a list of all
> the keyboards known to be used by the combination of country/language
> given at the localechooser stage,
Note: there is enough information in xkb-data to achieve
Frans Pop, le Sun 28 Jun 2009 13:00:19 +0200, a écrit :
> BTW, I would expect there are people in NL using Dvorak, but it's not
> being offered as a choice there...
Because xkb doesn't have that layout.
> > > 5) Dutch people very much *do* still type accented characters.
> >
> > ERrr, really? Th
On Sunday 28 June 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I know the situation. What I'm talking about is this:
> > 3) Both Dutch keymaps and American English keymaps are in use, but
> > the Dutch ones are a relatively small minority.
> > 4) If one of the variants currently listed under "Netherlands" really
Hello,
Frans Pop, le Sun 28 Jun 2009 09:09:20 +0200, a écrit :
> > http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21046
> > Could NL people comment on the bug?
>
> Eh, I *am* an NL person...
I know.
> I thought I'd already made my comments clear and explained the Dutch
> situation.
I know the sit
On Sunday 28 June 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> Eh, I *am* an NL person... I thought I'd already made my comments clear
> and explained the Dutch situation. Both in this thread and the BR from
> Kurt about Altgr (#524235).
>
> 1) Some time ago I set the default in c-s for NL to 'us' (r58049).
> 2) "Orig
On Sunday 28 June 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > I have no idea what the difference between "Netherlands" and
> > > "Netherlands - Standard" is. Such problems have to be reported
> > > upstream.
> >
> > There are a fair number of differences between those two variants in
> > /usr/share/X11/xkb
38 matches
Mail list logo
