On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 03:05:22PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 28 June 2009, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I think we should stop asking this question entirely. Hardly anyone
> > really needs anything other than pc105, except for the Brazilian and
> > Japanese cases that can be derived automatically from the keyboard
> > layout anyway.
> How appropriate is pc105 as a default?
> None of the 7 keyboards [1] I have here has the extra "LSGT" key ("<"
> + ">"), so they are all pc104...
What does it hurt to have a mapping for LSGT that doesn't have a
corresponding physical key? AFAICS, this is a detail that users shouldn't
have to care about, as long as the map gives them some other way to type <>.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
