On Thursday 17 July 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Ok, so for coherency we should probably go with the black on gray.
> Here is a patch that fixes the progression bar too.
Committed in SVN.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 491263 security
Bug#491263: network-console, etch netinst, openssh
There were no tags set.
Tags added: security
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 491263 debian-installer 20070308etch2
Bug#491263: network-console, etch netinst, openssh
Bug reassigned from package `network-console' to `debian-installer'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
reassign 491263 debian-installer 20070308etch2
thanks
On Friday 18 July 2008, Mike Edwards wrote:
> A few issues relating to network-console on etch netinst 4.0r3:
>
> * Keys generated by network-console are found on the blacklist included
> with newer versions of openssh-server.
>
> * If network-
Package: network-console
Version: 1.11
A few issues relating to network-console on etch netinst 4.0r3:
* Keys generated by network-console are found on the blacklist included
with newer versions of openssh-server.
* If network-console is used for a new installation, openssh-server is
installed o
Tach!
nach dem es nun wirklich veröffentlicht wurden, habe ich es auch gefunden in
voller länge und kostenfrei, bin doch nicht blöd. Aber schau selbst, der typ
von der nun ja haha der hat mehr Haare am Schwa als auf dem Kopf:
http://www.gina-lisa-4-free.com/
Gruß
Christian
--
To U
Tach!
nach dem es nun wirklich veröffentlicht wurden, habe ich es auch gefunden in
voller länge und kostenfrei, bin doch nicht blöd. Aber schau selbst, der typ
von der nun ja haha der hat mehr Haare am Schwa als auf dem Kopf:
http://www.gina-lisa-4-free.com/
Gruß
Christian
--
To U
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (No need to CC me
>
> On Thursday 17 July 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> I do agree it is annoying, but as Sebastien said, it's just about
>> installation. I've asked a few people, they said they wouldn't
>> complain if it could help others.
>
> It's annoy
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Jérémy Bobbio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would there be a way for the kuroboxpro-flash-debian script to determine
> the offset in the mtdblock where the installer image would have been
> written to?
There may be, but I have just kept it simple for now. If it stil
Accepted:
localechooser_2.04.dsc
to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_2.04.dsc
localechooser_2.04.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_2.04.tar.gz
localechooser_2.04_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_2.04_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
loca
localechooser_2.04_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
localechooser_2.04.dsc
localechooser_2.04.tar.gz
localechooser_2.04_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:45:04PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 17 July 2008, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> > Here is a patch that adds support for RAID6 and RAID10 to the debian
> > installer.
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> You seem to have moved two functions in that patch which have remained
> more or
Richard Rafalski, le Thu 17 Jul 2008 17:08:07 +0200, a écrit :
> >I've put an image doing this on
> >http://brl.thefreecat.org/mini.iso
> >And an image using white on blue as you suggested on
> >http://brl.thefreecat.org/mini-blue.iso
> >
> Thank you for the images. Both look good. It is ok to use
Jérémy Bobbio, le Thu 17 Jul 2008 18:57:10 +0200, a écrit :
> > For a version of the installer with full speech synthesis support, a
> > custom image would probably be the _only_ option.
>
> One of the other things that we have discussed (but not it full length)
> with Samuel after his talk durin
On Thursday 17 July 2008, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> Here is a patch that adds support for RAID6 and RAID10 to the debian
> installer.
Thanks a lot.
You seem to have moved two functions in that patch which have remained
more or less the same. This makes review more difficult then it should
be.
Could
also sprach Ryan Niebur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.07.17.2137 +0200]:
> Here is a patch that adds support for RAID6 and RAID10 to the
> debian installer.
Wow! Thanks!
> +_Description: Number of active devices for the RAID6 array:
> + The RAID6 array will consist of both active and spare partitions
Frans Pop wrote:
> I could see myself agreeing if you can come up with an implementation that
> only includes the beep for official builds (i.e. the addition of the beep
> is triggered by something in debian/rules).
I don't feel that making daily builds diverge here (or in any way
that is not st
Frans Pop wrote:
> It's also annoying for people using automated testing setups as they'd
> have random beeps coming out of their test systems, but I'll let Joey
> comment on that.
I don't actually have any test systems that boot to syslinux on real
hardware, so no beeps.
Trust me, the noise of
Here is a patch that adds support for RAID6 and RAID10 to the debian installer.
--
_
Ryan Niebur
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Index: kernel/kernel-wedge/modules/md-modules
===
--- kernel/kernel-wedge/modules/md-modules
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 04:49:12PM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
> >> No, it works. Earlier I wrote d-i kernel and ramdisk directly to
> >> flash partitions and load them. It works but destroys the
> >> original firmware.
> >
> > Why? Can't a path for a specific kernel be specified to uBoot?
>
> AF
Hi!
As someone that can sometimes start the installer more than 30 times a
day (which is a lot more often than one usually hears the deadred GDM
beep), I would strongly prefer to avoid a starting beep.
Starting there:
- most people probably don't start this installer that often,
- when I really
Hello,
Frans Pop, le Thu 17 Jul 2008 13:50:45 +0200, a écrit :
> On Tuesday 15 July 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Well, I don't think there is any architecture which shouldn't be
> > supported, except s390 on which speakup doesn't even compile. As for
> > the images, I guess we can for now inc
On Thursday 17 July 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> I'm sorry folks, I have a lot of respect for the extra effort needed
> every day to deal with life if you have a disability (of whatever
> form), but you cannot expect the world to always change things to fit
> your needs.
Note that everything in my las
On Tuesday 15 July 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Well, I don't think there is any architecture which shouldn't be
> supported, except s390 on which speakup doesn't even compile. As for
> the images, I guess we can for now include it on the same images as
> brltty, that would make things coherent
On Thursday 17 July 2008, Daniel Dalton wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:32:00PM +0200, Christian Schoepplein wrote:
> > For example a beep is generated everytime gdm gets started during the
> > bootup of a machine. I do not know anyone who would complain of that
>
> Very good point, so why isn'
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:32:00PM +0200, Christian Schoepplein wrote:
>
> For example a beep is generated everytime gdm gets started during the
> bootup of a machine. I do not know anyone who would complain of that
Very good point, so why isn't that annoying? So surely gdm logins would
be ran
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:34:49AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Daniel Dalton, le Thu 17 Jul 2008 20:22:52 +1000, a écrit :
> > But, the beep would solve this. I know it wouldn't help on a laptop, but
> > still.
>
> Why wouldn't it help on a laptop?
No console tone generator (pc speaker)?
> I
Frans Pop, le Thu 17 Jul 2008 12:32:39 +0200, a écrit :
> I could see myself agreeing if you can come up with an implementation that
> only includes the beep for official builds (i.e. the addition of the beep
> is triggered by something in debian/rules).
That should be feasible, so I guess that'
Daniel Dalton, le Thu 17 Jul 2008 20:22:52 +1000, a écrit :
> But, the beep would solve this. I know it wouldn't help on a laptop, but
> still.
Why wouldn't it help on a laptop? If there is no internal speaker maybe
you could use headphone?
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 07:15:38AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 17 July 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Samuel Thibault, le Thu 19 Jun 2008 11:08:32 +0100, a écrit :
> > > It is a bit hard for blind people to know exactly when they can type
> > > boot options for the installer. It would
(No need to CC me
On Thursday 17 July 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I do agree it is annoying, but as Sebastien said, it's just about
> installation. I've asked a few people, they said they wouldn't
> complain if it could help others.
It's annoying for me amongst others. I do huge numbers of in
Your message dated Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:19:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#489588: Install report Medion akoye E1210 (MD96910)
has caused the Debian Bug report #489588,
regarding Install report Medion akoye E1210 (MD96910)
to be marked as done.
This means that
Frans Pop, le Thu 17 Jul 2008 07:15:38 +0200, a écrit :
> On Thursday 17 July 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Samuel Thibault, le Thu 19 Jun 2008 11:08:32 +0100, a écrit :
> > > It is a bit hard for blind people to know exactly when they can type
> > > boot options for the installer. It would be
On Monday 07 July 2008, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 07, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > udev is already frozen as part of the base freeze. Do you hope to get
> > a freeze exception for this new upstream release? If not, before the
> > next
>
> I definitely hope to get multiple exceptions
On Tuesday 15 July 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > What policy have we been following for this for other languages?
> > The README currently says "but if you know the installer will never
> > have a message containing a given character (such as the Euro s
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Ryan Braun [ADS] wrote:
> filesystem{ ext3 } mountpoint{ /var/opt } .
> 2000 2000 25% linux-swap method{ swap } format{ } .
25%?
This is the only strange thing I can see. Try 100% instead.
> And the preseed definitions
> d-i partman-auto/disk string /dev/sda
> d-i partm
On Tuesday 15 July 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The RAID system is recognized as /dev/sdb and no /dev/sda available.
> So Grub and fstab get a configuration for /dev/sdb during the
> installation.
This is very strange. It is very unusual that the kernel would skip sda
during installation. Are
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Per Andersson wrote:
> The adding of jffs2 to i386 is not related to Kurobox Pro
> support, only done by request. [0]
However, I'm not sure that is sufficient reason to add the udeb for i386
now. I have not yet seen any concrete mails or proposals for supporting
XO in
Hi,
this mail from Sven arrived at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and should (IMHO) go to
debian-boot mailing list.
Greetings
Martin
On Wed Jul 16, 2008 at 16:46:40 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 04:33:29PM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 04:25:21PM +0200, Per An
Your message dated Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:53:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#490122: Lenny dmraid=true Fails on HP ProLiant ML110 G5
has caused the Debian Bug report #490122,
regarding Lenny dmraid=true Fails on HP ProLiant ML110 G5
to be marked as done.
This me
reassign 491147 parted 1.7.1-5.1
retitle 491147 kernel and fdisk see partitions but libparted does not
tags d-i
thanks
On Thursday 17 July 2008, Daniel Browne wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> Boots fine, no problems until partitioning. The partitioner shows all
> of my hard disks. However, it does no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 491147 parted 1.7.1-5.1
Bug#491147:
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `parted'.
> retitle 491147 kernel and fdisk see partitions but libparted does not
Bug#491147:
Changed Bug title to `kernel and fdisk see partitions but
Hi,
> IIRC correctly it has been discussed before and was rejected as to
> annoying for the normal case. I must say I agree with that.
And I do also. However, I'd like to ask the folloing question: assuming
that this may be of some help for others, would such an annoyance really
be unacceptable
43 matches
Mail list logo
