On Monday 31 December 2007, Praveen A wrote:
> Would that mean a newer kernel will fix that? Or should we maintain a
> list of know hardware to use --directisa option?
>
> I was about to report it as a bug against util-linux. Is it a known
> issue? Should I go ahead and report it?
No, it's not an
Package: console-setup
Version: 1.19
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: incorrect-dependency
When testing dependency based boot sequencing, I discovered a bug in
the init.d script for console. It got the same provides as
console-screen.sh, and this make the update-rc.d provi
Accepted:
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.126_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.126_i386.udeb
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.126_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.126_i386.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.126_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-priority_0.126_all.udeb
cdebco
cdebconf_0.126_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.126.dsc
cdebconf_0.126.tar.gz
cdebconf-priority_0.126_all.udeb
cdebconf_0.126_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.126_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.126_i386.deb
cdebconf-udeb_0.126_i386.udeb
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 11:49:46AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 24 December 2007, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I've done this in r50612. Could you confirm whether this fixes this bug?
>
> Yep. Works great [1]. Thx.
>
> [1] To test I've only copied the new debconf-copydb into my saved testcase.
2007/12/17, Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I seen that also on some hardware.
> Adding the option `--directisa` did help for me.
>
Thanks. It helped me too.
> > Fedora core 8 with 2.6.23 kernel was able to setup this correctly on 6510b.
>
> Yes, the "error" is a combination of kernel and har
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think that code might be more clear if you change the cleanup step
>> to be a funtion and it will make simpler to spot what is being done in
>> each case.
>
> Yes, this does improve readability.
And it did, indeed. This lastest version is much easier
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 09:43:15AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> imo, the best and more widly solution would be the 2. That shouldn't
> >> be too hard and would allow us to reduce the memory footprint not only
> >> on your user case but in general
Package: discover-data
Version: 2.2007.08.07
I use debian live to create liveCD, and usediscover-data to configure
Xorg, my computer use Intel i910 and display is not automatically
determined, "vesa" is configured. But when I set manually i810 X start
correctly
--
Sylvain Garcia
Aliasource
Please see this site in Subject
Package: installation-guide
Version: 20070319
Severity: normal
Section D.3 of the Lenny installation guide is out of date. I observe at least
the following required changes:
- The debootstrap-udeb package is required, not the debootstrap package.
- Running debootstrap should refer to lenny, not e
On Monday 31 December 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
> This is probably because we have not added relatime support yet,
> although there is a BR open about it already.
> However, it should not fail like you describe. I'll try to look into
> that.
I was mistaken. We do have relatime support. I'll still loo
Eagles defeated Siena University 83-79. Niagara returnsWhen the 4 minutes of
stoppage time were up, the game
Maximize the measurement of your stick by the next year!
Great price reductions for our super-p!ll will rejoice you!
Don't lose your chance! Our offer is definitely worth your regard!
C
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Monday 31 December 2007, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Before I activate this feature, I wanted to give you people
> > opportunities to react and bring input.
>
> It's on my ToDo list, but I've been giving partman work priority.
>
> Could you describe wh
On Monday 31 December 2007, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Before I activate this feature, I wanted to give you people
> opportunities to react and bring input.
It's on my ToDo list, but I've been giving partman work priority.
Could you describe where exactly to find the new scripts and give an
over
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> After a discussion we had in -boot back in November, which involved
> Frans Pop and myself, mostly, I worked on a new version of the
> synchronization script (scripts/l10n/l10n-sync in SVN), that allows
> splitting messages in "sublevels" for all cor
Your message dated Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387322: fixed in discover1 1.7.22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#235107: fixed in discover1 1.7.22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#235107: fixed in discover1 1.7.22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Hello Frans,
thank you very much for your answer.
Am Montag 31 Dezember 2007 15:56 schrieb Frans Pop:
> On Thursday 27 December 2007, Manfred Rebentisch wrote:
> > Comments/Problems:
> > 1. I choose "expertgui"
>
> Note that "expert" really is only intended for people for are very
> familiar with
Accepted:
discover1_1.7.22.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.7.22.dsc
discover1_1.7.22.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.7.22.tar.gz
discover1_1.7.22_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.7.22_i386.deb
libdiscover1-dev_1.7.22_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/discover1/libdi
discover1_1.7.22_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover1_1.7.22.dsc
discover1_1.7.22.tar.gz
discover1_1.7.22_i386.deb
libdiscover1_1.7.22_i386.deb
libdiscover1-dev_1.7.22_i386.deb
libdiscover1-pic_1.7.22_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian q
On Thursday 27 December 2007, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> Comentários/Problemas:
> - On the initial screen of country selection pressing the 'p' key
> doesn't take me to countrys with names started with P. The keyboard
> it's disabled on that screen (tested 2 times).
Was this using the newt (textua
On Thursday 27 December 2007, Manfred Rebentisch wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> 1. I choose "expertgui"
Note that "expert" really is only intended for people for are very
familiar with the installer and actually need the additional options.
> 2. Can choose kernels, but missing description about t
On Monday 31 December 2007, Michel BRIAND wrote:
> Speedtouch includes some firmware that are non-free. But we could find
> a way to include them anyway. A special non-free netinst iso?
No, sorry. This basically means it not an option to include it in Debian.
However, you can still install Debian
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:52:53 +0100
>On Sunday 30 December 2007, Michel BRIAND wrote:
>> Include the package speedtouch-ng in the netinst ISO so that we can
>> install Debian with old dsl modem ;)
>
>I cannot find any package with that name in Debian, which basically
>
On Friday 28 December 2007, AirBAT wrote:
> When i'm booting on the latest release (4.0R1) i was unable to perform
> the installation. The hang when discover my hardware.
>
> Here is the last line during this procedure : APIC Assume pci root
> bridge.
This very much looks like a kernel issue with
On Saturday 29 December 2007, Tim Stoop wrote:
> I'm trying to get the following (part of my) recipe to work:
> 1 1 1 lvm \
> method{ lvm } \
I'm not sure where you got this from, but we don't have
reassign 458416 linux-2.6 2.6.22-6
retitle 458416 [sparc sun blade 100] oops during installation
thanks
On Monday 31 December 2007, Iain Rae wrote:
> kobject_add failed for :00:07.0 with -EEXIST, don't try to register
> things with the same name in the same directory.
[...]
Although I think t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 458416 linux-2.6 2.6.22-6
Bug#458416: Installation report latest lenny on SPARC
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `linux-2.6'.
> retitle 458416 [sparc sun blade 100] oops during installation
Bug#458416: Installation report
On Sunday 30 December 2007, Michel BRIAND wrote:
> Include the package speedtouch-ng in the netinst ISO so that we can
> install Debian with old dsl modem ;)
I cannot find any package with that name in Debian, which basically means
that the installer team cannot do anything with this request.
Th
Please see this site in Subject
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> imo, the best and more widly solution would be the 2. That shouldn't
>> be too hard and would allow us to reduce the memory footprint not only
>> on your user case but in general usage too.
>
> Might be vearing off topic for this bug, but here's a wrappe
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 07:15:01PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yeah. Options here would be:
> > 1) big hammer - write a modprobe wrapper that cleans
> > unused/unloadable modules after every load
> > 2) smaller hammer - write a modprobe wrapper
34 matches
Mail list logo
