Vizit mycheapoem . com in Internnet Xp1orer browser.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vizit mycheapoem . com in Internnet Xp1orer browser.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Our price $79 ADOBE ACROBAT Professional
http://www.skysofte.cn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While a good argument has been made that fixing this in nsis is not
feasable, this is still a bad sequence of events:
* Joe User inserts Debian CD.
* Windows tells him it has a virus.
* Joe User does not install Debian.
If this happened every time, we'd probably need to reconsider
autolaunching w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> reopen 442225
Bug#442225: installer triggers anti-virus detection
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags 442225 wontfix
Bug#442225: installer triggers anti-virus detection
Ther
Robert Millan wrote:
> Author: rmh
> Date: Fri Sep 14 15:34:58 2007
> New Revision: 49295
>
> Log:
> Add dialog to choose desktop environment (GNOME, KDE, XFCE, None).
We've chosen not to bother the user with a choice of desktop
environments in d-i, for reasons that, while one may agree with them
AFAIK, nothing has changed since we last discussed this, only a few
months ago -- has it?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 02:05:56PM +, Joey Hess wrote:
> > -Use special tasks 0ftasks="kde-desktop, standard"07
> > +Select the kde or xfce desktops 0fdesktop=kde-desktop07
>
> Small aesthetic nitpicking: why not make it "desktop=kde" in
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 03:11:06PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I would recommend that when no other OS is found, GRUB confirmation
> > > isn't displayed unless in expert mode. That is, to lower priority
> > > for grub-ins
Although, this needs proper documentation and warnings in the installer
manual and future release notes: like Christian noted, this can be bad
if os-prober fails to do its job.
This is a bit like the issue of whether to prompt for which drive to
use, IMO the risk if detection goes wrong is
Your message dated Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:17:35 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#441174: fixed in rescue 1.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Accepted:
rescue-check_1.12_all.udeb
to pool/main/r/rescue/rescue-check_1.12_all.udeb
rescue-mode_1.12_all.udeb
to pool/main/r/rescue/rescue-mode_1.12_all.udeb
rescue_1.12.dsc
to pool/main/r/rescue/rescue_1.12.dsc
rescue_1.12.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rescue/rescue_1.12.tar.gz
Override entri
rescue_1.12_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rescue_1.12.dsc
rescue_1.12.tar.gz
rescue-check_1.12_all.udeb
rescue-mode_1.12_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 12:24:19PM +0100, Ian McDonald wrote:
> But when I choose English as a language during a manual install, and
> actually skip tasksel, it doesn't install it.
>
> So, I return to my original question. How do I *skip* tasksel.
This can't be done currently. But you can tell
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 02:05:56PM +, Joey Hess wrote:
> -Use special tasks 0ftasks="kde-desktop, standard"07
> +Select the kde or xfce desktops 0fdesktop=kde-desktop07
Small aesthetic nitpicking: why not make it "desktop=kde" instead of
"desktop=kde-desktop"?
(CCing in case you are not subscribed.)
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 02:45:24PM +0200, cco wrote:
> I am experiencing some weird problems with debconf-apt-progress during
> the tasksel step when using the etch netinst cd (amd64).
Could you please try the following image:
http://people.debian.org/~lu
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 03:11:06PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I would recommend that when no other OS is found, GRUB confirmation isn't
> > displayed unless in expert mode. That is, to lower priority for
> > grub-installer/only_debian (see atta
I guess that fixing this will as a side effect fix this annoying
behavior:
Setting up ion3 (20070902-1) ...
Question database /var/lib/cdebconf/questions.dat clean; not saving
Question database /var/lib/cdebconf/passwords.dat clean; not saving
Template database /var/lib/cdebconf/templates.dat cle
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> block 328498 with 442291
Bug#442291: debconf-communicate clears screen when used with newt frontend
Bug#328498: switch to cdebconf as default
Was blocked by: 212881 247744 321038 3277
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 08:08:51PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Robert Millan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > I would recommend that when no other OS is found, GRUB confirmation isn't
> > displayed unless in expert mode. That is, to lower priority for
> > grub-installer/only_debian (see
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.120
Severity: wishlist
To be a full debconf replacement, a dpkg-preconfigure for cdebconf would
be nice.
We could get away without one, but then we'd lose grouping the debconf
questions at the start of the install or upgrade, and I feel that's a
useful debconf feature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> block 328498 with 442287
Bug#442287: dpkg-reconfigure segfaults
Bug#328498: switch to cdebconf as default
Was blocked by: 247744 321038 327730 331730 331731 331732 331733 331734 33173
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> block 328498 with 442288
Bug#442288: dpkg-reconfigure -p doesn't change priority
Bug#328498: switch to cdebconf as default
Was blocked by: 247744 321038 327730 331730 331731 331732 33
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> block 328498 with 212881
Bug#212881: cdebconf: Should include non-interactive frontend
Bug#328498: switch to cdebconf as default
Was blocked by: 247744 321038 327730 331730 331731 331
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> block 328498 with 442290
Bug#442290: dpkg-reconfigure skips seen questions
Bug#328498: switch to cdebconf as default
Was blocked by: 247744 321038 327730 331730 331731 331732 331733 3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> block 328498 with 247744
Bug#247744: diverges from debconf for select questions that are asked and not
displayed
Bug#328498: switch to cdebconf as default
Was blocked by: 321038 3277
Well, there should be no more blocking bugs on this, thanks to Amaya.
Now we just need to figure out a procedure to migrate from debconf to
cdebconf.
The first problem I've run into is that cdebconf fails to run if any of
/var/lib/cdebconf/*.dat are missing. And installing the package doesn't
pro
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.120
Severity: normal
Consider a script that does something like:
ret=$(echo "GET debconf/priority | debconf-communicate")
If cdebconf and the newt frontend are used, debconf-communicate outputs
escape sequences to clear the screen, so this won't work.
There are prob
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.120
Severity: normal
cdebconf's dpkg-reconfigure's usage says it support -p or --priority to
change the priority, but this doesn't actually work. Here is what
happens when I tell it to reconfigure slrn using -p low:
--> INPUT medium shared/mailname
<-- 30 question ski
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.120
Severity: normal
cdebconf's dpkg-reconfigure skips seen questions:
--> INPUT high debconf/priority
<-- 30 question skipped
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.120
Severity: normal
If I run cdebconf's dpkg-reconfigure on a debconf-using package such as
slrn or debconf, it crashes at the end:
--> VERSION 2.0
<-- 0 2.0
--> CAPB backup
<-- 0 multiselect backup progresscancel
--> BEGINBLOCK
<-- 0
--> INPUT medium debconf/fronten
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would recommend that when no other OS is found, GRUB confirmation isn't
> displayed unless in expert mode. That is, to lower priority for
> grub-installer/only_debian (see attached patch).
I personally agree with it. Let's see what others have to say
Quoting Robert Millan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> I would recommend that when no other OS is found, GRUB confirmation isn't
> displayed unless in expert mode. That is, to lower priority for
> grub-installer/only_debian (see attached patch).
>
> Any comments?
Well, in theory, that's interesting, b
Hi,
I've been suggested that it would be a good idea to detect the screen resolution
in win32-loader and preseed that to the debconf templates in the xserver-xorg
package.
I think this is unnecessary and it's better to leave the decision entirely to
xserver-xorg scripts. Does someone think othe
I would recommend that when no other OS is found, GRUB confirmation isn't
displayed unless in expert mode. That is, to lower priority for
grub-installer/only_debian (see attached patch).
Any comments?
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want my phone call!
What use is a phone call, if you
All data is transmitted through a secure server by our credit card processor.
http://fromad.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted:
env-preseed_1.31_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/preseed/env-preseed_1.31_all.udeb
file-preseed_1.31_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/preseed/file-preseed_1.31_all.udeb
initrd-preseed_1.31_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/preseed/initrd-preseed_1.31_all.udeb
network-preseed_1.31_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/pr
preseed_1.31_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
preseed_1.31.dsc
preseed_1.31.tar.gz
preseed-common_1.31_all.udeb
network-preseed_1.31_all.udeb
file-preseed_1.31_all.udeb
initrd-preseed_1.31_all.udeb
env-preseed_1.31_all.udeb
Greetings,
You
Our team of Scientists spent years developing a product that will safely and
effectively add length, width
http://fromad.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is the recommended dose of Manster?
http://fromad.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asteracantha longifolia 75 mg
http://fromad.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: win32-loader
Version: 0.6.0~pre1
Severity: normal
I got a user report saying that in a weird setup like:
- WinXP in F:
- Win98 in C:
- boot.ini in C:
win32-loader fails to find boot.ini and aborts. Although boot.ini location
can be altered via expert mode, it'd be good if there w
hi!
I am experiencing some weird problems with debconf-apt-progress during
the tasksel step when using the etch netinst cd (amd64).
I am using the iso from:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/4.0_r1/amd64/iso-cd/
the debconf pkg on the iso fs is:
debconf_1.5.11_all.deb
here is what happens; t
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 01:46:19PM +0200, Lars wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Thank you for your report, but this is not a bug in win32-loader. The file
> > that triggers this is in fact in nsis, but it's not a bug in nsis either.
>
> I do not know about.
> Just for the annoyance: "wasn't it shipped with wi
Hi,
> Thank you for your report, but this is not a bug in win32-loader. The file
> that triggers this is in fact in nsis, but it's not a bug in nsis either.
I do not know about.
Just for the annoyance: "wasn't it shipped with win32-loader"?
> These so-called anti-virus programs generally work
Any new information about this bug report?
Or ist more information / testing needed?
Regards,
Arne
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vizit mycheapoem. com in Internnet Xp1orer browser.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:45:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#442225: installer triggers anti-virus detection
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Package: partman-base
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
the attached patch against current d-i svn adds multipath support in an
(hopefully) unintrusive way. Please apply. This together with the
already posted patches to parted an hw-detect as well as the
parted-multipath udeb will allow the insta
Hi,
>It would also be interesting knowing how the new set of libraries
>performs on PPC architecture, especially on boxes equipped with nvidia
>graphic chips, whre DFB 0.9.25 used to crash.
I hope to find the time to test it on my macbook (equipped with an Ingel
945G),
since previous version
Package: win32-loader
Version: 0.6.0~pre3
Hi,
when running the win32-loader installer on win2000, Trend Micro OfficeScan 7.3
stops the installation due to a virus detection. The attached screenshots show
the warning message of the virus detection (including the "dangerous" dll file)
and the result
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
Hi!
To see how smooth would be the migration to core components of the
graphical installer currently in experimental, I have built a test image
using directfb 1.0.1-2 and GTK+ 2.11.6-1.
I have not noticed any problems so far, but perhaps some of you could.
You can get the i
Btw, I'd like to point out that we're releasing official images for installing
Debian that don't include any signature and are hence vulnerable to DNS
spoofing, etc. Unfortunately my complains didn't draw much attention (perhaps
they weren't addressed at the right place?). Anyway, see #379129.
53 matches
Mail list logo
