Your message dated Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418850: fixed in cdrom-detect 1.22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419141: fixed in iso-scan 1.21
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Accepted:
partman-partitioning_49.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_49.dsc
partman-partitioning_49.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_49.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_49_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_
Accepted:
cdrom-detect_1.22.dsc
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_1.22.dsc
cdrom-detect_1.22.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_1.22.tar.gz
cdrom-detect_1.22_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_1.22_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
cdrom-detect_
Accepted:
mountfloppy_0.12.dsc
to pool/main/m/mountfloppy/mountfloppy_0.12.dsc
mountfloppy_0.12.tar.gz
to pool/main/m/mountfloppy/mountfloppy_0.12.tar.gz
mountfloppy_0.12_all.udeb
to pool/main/m/mountfloppy/mountfloppy_0.12_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
mountfloppy_0.12.dsc -
Accepted:
iso-scan_1.21.dsc
to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_1.21.dsc
iso-scan_1.21.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_1.21.tar.gz
iso-scan_1.21_all.udeb
to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_1.21_all.udeb
load-iso_1.21_all.udeb
to pool/main/i/iso-scan/load-iso_1.21_all.udeb
Override ent
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 06:09:55PM -0300, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Ok. This means that the actual upgrade from grub1 to grub2 should be
> > totally safe for all users by default, because grub-install is not
> > automatically run, yes?
>
> Yes. It won't change the system unt
iso-scan_1.21_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
iso-scan_1.21.dsc
iso-scan_1.21.tar.gz
iso-scan_1.21_all.udeb
load-iso_1.21_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
mountfloppy_0.12_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
mountfloppy_0.12.dsc
mountfloppy_0.12.tar.gz
mountfloppy_0.12_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
cdrom-detect_1.22_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdrom-detect_1.22.dsc
cdrom-detect_1.22.tar.gz
cdrom-detect_1.22_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
partman-partitioning_49_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-partitioning_49.dsc
partman-partitioning_49.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_49_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:14:09PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Frans already asked most of the questions that I had. A few others:
> >
> > Is anybody else using grub2 as a default bootloader today?
>
> Not yet.
Just an entry point, which may
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 23:51, peter green wrote:
> unfortunately it still seems to be backed up out of testing by a
> missing build-dep on gcc-4.2 :)
I would not expect testing to be really usable to build the installer for
quite some time.
pgp0d5VLcAtGN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.46_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.46_i386.udeb
ata-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.46_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.46_i386.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.20-1-
Accepted:
linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.04.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.04.dsc
linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
loop-aes-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.04_i386.udeb
to
po
Accepted:
linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.04.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.04.dsc
linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
loop-aes-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.04_amd64.ude
> -Original Message-
> From: Geert Stappers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 April 2007 22:15
> To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: nano-udeb: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.5)
>
>
> Op 21-04-2007 om 16:40 schreef Frans Pop:
> > On Saturday 21 April 2007 09:13, Geert Stappers wrot
Op 21-04-2007 om 16:40 schreef Frans Pop:
> On Saturday 21 April 2007 09:13, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > When is libc 2.5 expected to arrive?
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=glibc
It did arrive:-)
Cheers
Geert Stappers
( telling the readers of the list archive that
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:14:09PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> > Hrm. What was wrong with the existing format? :/ Those are the kinds of
>> > upstream changes that are most aggravating for administrators (or at least
>> > for this administrator h
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:14:09PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> The upgrade from grub to grub2 will be transparent since menu.list can
> >> be automaticaly converted to the new format and this will be in place
> >> when we start the default boot-loader change.
> > Hrm. What was wrong with t
acpi-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.46_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.46_i386.udeb
ata-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.46_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.46_i386.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.46
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.24_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.24_amd64.udeb
ata-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.24_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.24_amd64.udeb
cdrom-core-mod
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Frans already asked most of the questions that I had. A few others:
>
> Is anybody else using grub2 as a default bootloader today?
Not yet.
> Has testing of grub2 explicitly included testing on older x86 systems, given
> that we've found that i486 wa
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.46_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.46.dsc
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.46.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.46_i386.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.46_i386.udeb
nic-extra-modules-2.6.20-1-486-
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.24_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.24.dsc
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.24.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.24_amd64.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.24_amd64.udeb
nic-extra-modules-2.6
linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.04.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.04.dsc
linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
(new) loop-aes-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.04_i386.udeb extra debian-
linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.04.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.04.dsc
linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
(new) loop-aes-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.04_amd64.udeb ext
linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.04_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.04.dsc
linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
loop-aes-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.04_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.04_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.04.dsc
linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
loop-aes-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.04_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 21:01, Henry Bremridge wrote:
> Mini-installation worked, I am not sure where the syslog saved to.
During the installation the syslog is in /var/log/syslog. you can use
the "Save debug logs" option in the main menu to get it off the system.
> Installation chose the cor
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:56:59PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> reopen 419386
> reassign 419386 netcfg 1.37
> forcemerge 419386 410560
> thanks
>
> > In going through the log, I noted something else in choosing a
> > connection I was offered eth0 or eth1. eth0 is I think the firewire
> > connection a
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:59:51AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> We, the GRUB team, want to swtich to GRUB2 due many reasons, basicaly:
> - easier to maintain;
> - better codebase;
> - multi-arch support;
"support for multiple architectures" :)
> Our current plan is to finish the update-gru
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 25 April 2007 14:59, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> We, the GRUB team, want to swtich to GRUB2 due many reasons, basicaly:
>> - better codebase;
>
> Is grub2 fundamentally different from grub, or is it basically based on
> the current grub but just
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 14:59, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> We, the GRUB team, want to swtich to GRUB2 due many reasons, basicaly:
> - better codebase;
Is grub2 fundamentally different from grub, or is it basically based on
the current grub but just developed further?
> - multi-arch support;
D
Accepted:
debian-installer-utils_1.48.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.48.dsc
debian-installer-utils_1.48.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.48.tar.gz
di-utils-exit-installer_1.48_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-ut
debian-installer-utils_1.48_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer-utils_1.48.dsc
debian-installer-utils_1.48.tar.gz
di-utils-shell_1.48_all.udeb
di-utils-reboot_1.48_all.udeb
di-utils-exit-installer_1.48_all.udeb
di-utils-terminfo_1.48_a
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:52:50AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Our current plan is to finish the update-grub2 merging on upstream
> >> side (being handled by Robert) and then upload a new package to
> >> Debian. This package after moving to lenn
Op 25-04-2007 om 10:54 schreef Otavio Salvador:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) writes:
> > My advice to make that switch (and switch back) more easy,
> > is to implement a "bootselector".
"bootloaderselector".
> You mean for the both grub and grub2?
>
> Well, we want to reduce the grub us
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 420950 pending
Bug#420950: i translated tamil tasksel package
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
tags 420950 pending
thanks
Quoting senthil kumar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> package: tasksel
> version: 1.1
> translate: tamil
> status: installed
>
>
> i download from translation underway and modified that package
> i install its working good ... i want to upload this file
Commited. Howe
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 16:02, Geert Stappers wrote:
> What about fixing it in the Etch SVN branch also?
Not needed. Trunk will be published for Etch.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Op 25-04-2007 om 11:52 schreef Frans Pop:
> On Wednesday 25 April 2007 18:07, Rémi Demarthe wrote:
> >
> > This just need to remove the 'deb' in each translation.
>
> Fixed in SVN. Thanks.
What about fixing it in the Etch SVN branch also?
HtH
GSt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) writes:
> Op 25-04-2007 om 10:18 schreef Otavio Salvador:
>> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I wonder if we will also move from yaboot-installer to grub2-installer
>> > on powerpc, and if you have given any thought to that migration path ?
>>
>
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Our current plan is to finish the update-grub2 merging on upstream
>> side (being handled by Robert) and then upload a new package to
>> Debian. This package after moving to lenny ought be set as default
>> boot-loader in grub-installer (while we still
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:59:51AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> We, the GRUB team, want to swtich to GRUB2 due many reasons, basicaly:
>
> - easier to maintain;
> - better codebase;
> - multi-arch support;
> - active upstream;
Op 25-04-2007 om 10:18 schreef Otavio Salvador:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I wonder if we will also move from yaboot-installer to grub2-installer
> > on powerpc, and if you have given any thought to that migration path ?
>
> Our main goal is to switch i386 and amd64 first.
Your message dated Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:23:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line should work
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wonder if we will also move from yaboot-installer to grub2-installer
> on powerpc, and if you have given any thought to that migration path ?
Our main goal is to switch i386 and amd64 first.
We intend to use GRUB2 as much as possible also to reduce th
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:59:51AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> We, the GRUB team, want to swtich to GRUB2 due many reasons, basicaly:
>
> - easier to maintain;
> - better codebase;
> - multi-arch support;
> - active upstream;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
We, the GRUB team, want to swtich to GRUB2 due many reasons, basicaly:
- easier to maintain;
- better codebase;
- multi-arch support;
- active upstream;
Our current plan is to finish the update-grub2 merging on upstream
side (being handle
* Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-26 17:48]:
> > From where would I run anna-install? Is there some infrastructure or
> > would I need to add a d-i startup script?
> Somewhere in rootskel, or else in hw-detect. The last is probably more
> logical.
Background: installations on NSLU2 run in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 410065 installation-guide-arm
Bug#410065: installation-report: d-i rc1, NSLU2: minor network-console and boot
issues
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `installation-guide-arm'.
> retitle 410065 Describe NSLU2 installation
Your message dated Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#411551: fixed in flash-kernel 1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403017: fixed in flash-kernel 1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#413373: fixed in flash-kernel 1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Accepted:
flash-kernel-installer_1.2_arm.udeb
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel-installer_1.2_arm.udeb
flash-kernel_1.2.dsc
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_1.2.dsc
flash-kernel_1.2.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_1.2.tar.gz
flash-kernel_1.2_arm.deb
to pool/m
flash-kernel_1.2_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
flash-kernel_1.2.dsc
flash-kernel_1.2.tar.gz
flash-kernel_1.2_arm.deb
flash-kernel-installer_1.2_arm.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 420894 installation-guide
Bug#420894: debian-installer-manual: [appendix/preseed]
apt-setup/local0/repository string does not contain 'deb'
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer-manual' to `installation-guide'.
> tags 420894 + pending
reassign 420894 installation-guide
tags 420894 + pending
thanks
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 18:07, Rémi Demarthe wrote:
> #Additional repositories, local[0-9] available
> #d-i apt-setup/local0/repository string \
> # deb http://local.server/debian stable main
>
> This adds a 'deb deb http://loc
Package: debian-installer-manual
Severity: normal
Hello,
The pressed appendix mention :
#Additional repositories, local[0-9] available
#d-i apt-setup/local0/repository string \
# deb http://local.server/debian stable main
This adds a 'deb deb http://local.server/debian stable main' in the
60 matches
Mail list logo
