Package: debian-installer
Version: 20061102
I'm trying to use d-i to netboot a system and run a preseeded install,
with the preseed config being loaded via http. The configuration of
my network is such that I have to use an http proxy to reach Debian
mirrors, so I have a mirror/http/proxy setting
Christian Perrier wrote:
> We bloody have to release now, this is getting much much annoying.
Frans Pop wrote:
> As I've said on IRC, IMO D-I RC2 should be released with the final
> _kernel_ if at all possible, not just the final kernel _ABI_.
We could make a beta 4 release at this point. I'm co
Your message dated Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:47:53 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line debian-installer: netboot fails on Sun V100, errors from dmfe
network driver
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
During the World Free Software Conference 3.0 (that bubulle, tbm and I
attended in Extremadura last week) I spoke with Willie Walker who works
for Sun on Accessibility and Speech.
Willie is the lead man behind ORCA [1], which works with GTK and could
thus possibly be integrated in the graphical
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 20:39, Frans Pop elendil-at-planet.nl |reportbug|
wrote:
> Now you are completely confusing me. "Failure on module loading" is not
> the same as "failure to recognize the CD".
Okay, I should have worded that better (I did not remember the exact working of
the error).
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 01:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> # udevinfo -q env -p /sys/block/sr0
> ID_VENDOR=LaCie
> ID_MODEL=LaCie_CDRW_USB
> ID_REVISION=
> ID_SERIAL=LaCie_LaCie_CDRW_USB_1E000AF0C2C8
> ID_TYPE=floppy
> ID_BUS=usb
> ID_PATH=pci-:00:1d.7-usb-0:3:1.0-scsi-0:0:0:0
OK.
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 01:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just to make sure, I also tried todays (13.02.2007) daily build of the
> netinstall iso. Same result as before: failure on module loading.
Now you are completely confusing me. "Failure on module loading" is not
the same as "failure t
2 from http://www.slug-firmware.net/
Date: 20070213 20:00
Machine: NSLU2
Partitions:
FilesystemType 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 ext3 9416516485256 8452928 6% /
tmpfstmpfs 15000 0 15000 0% /lib/init/rw
I made a mistake in my debugging.
My output should have read:
# udevinfo -q env -p /sys/block/sr0
ID_VENDOR=LaCie
ID_MODEL=LaCie_CDRW_USB
ID_REVISION=
ID_SERIAL=LaCie_LaCie_CDRW_USB_1E000AF0C2C8
ID_TYPE=floppy
ID_BUS=usb
ID_PATH=pci-:00:1d.7-usb-0:3:1.0-scsi-0:0:0:0
As asked, I uncomm
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 06:15:47PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > The rule Gordon suggested could be included on all arm machines since
> > it mentions the ixp4xx driver:
> > # Built-in Ethernet Adapter (NPE-B microcode not present)
> > SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="ixp4xx_mac", NAME="eth1"
> > And th
Just to make sure, I also tried todays (13.02.2007) daily build of the
netinstall iso. Same result as before: failure on module loading.
Full download URL:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
x31:/home/agent# udevinfo -q en
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.23
Severity: normal
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: Flashed ROM with d-i netinstall image.
Image version: debian-etch-rc1-20061102 from http://www.slug-firmware.net/
Date: 20070213 20:00
Machine: NSLU2
Partitions:
FilesystemType 1K
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 00:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> $ udevinfo -q env -p /sys/block/sr0
> ID_CDROM=1
In that case the command 'list-devices cd' should return the device, as it
has this code:
if ! $match && [ "$TYPE" = cd ]; then
if udevinfo -q env -p "$devpath" 2>/dev/null
I did indeed use a daily netinstall (see image version/date in original post).
I have tried a newer daily build from 11.02.2007 and still get the same result
(module load error).
The full download path was:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testi
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> The rule Gordon suggested could be included on all arm machines since
> it mentions the ixp4xx driver:
>
> # Built-in Ethernet Adapter (NPE-B microcode not present)
> SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="ixp4xx_mac", NAME="eth1"
>
> And then the unofficial ixp4xx image which cont
Your message dated Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410392: fixed in preseed 1.27
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-13 23:18]:
> So? None of them will work without the proprietary microcode that
> cannot be included in Debian.
(In theory, there could be a IXP4xx based device that contains the
microcode in flash; but the ixp4xx driver in Debian doesn't allow
loadi
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-13 18:15]:
> > And then the unofficial ixp4xx image which contains the microcode
> > would simply need to remove that file from the initramfs.
>
> There are other arm machines that use ixp4xx ethernet though.
So? None of them will work without the proprie
Your message dated Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403293: fixed in libdebian-installer 0.48
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Accepted:
env-preseed_1.27_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/preseed/env-preseed_1.27_all.udeb
file-preseed_1.27_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/preseed/file-preseed_1.27_all.udeb
initrd-preseed_1.27_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/preseed/initrd-preseed_1.27_all.udeb
network-preseed_1.27_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/pr
Accepted:
libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.48_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.48_amd64.udeb
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.48_amd64.deb
to
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.48_amd64.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0
Accepted:
apt-cdrom-setup_0.19_all.udeb
to pool/main/a/apt-setup/apt-cdrom-setup_0.19_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.19_all.udeb
to pool/main/a/apt-setup/apt-mirror-setup_0.19_all.udeb
apt-setup-udeb_0.19_all.udeb
to pool/main/a/apt-setup/apt-setup-udeb_0.19_all.udeb
apt-setup_0.19.dsc
to poo
preseed_1.27_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
preseed_1.27.dsc
preseed_1.27.tar.gz
preseed-common_1.27_all.udeb
network-preseed_1.27_all.udeb
file-preseed_1.27_all.udeb
initrd-preseed_1.27_all.udeb
env-preseed_1.27_all.udeb
Greetings,
Yo
libdebian-installer_0.48_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libdebian-installer_0.48.dsc
libdebian-installer_0.48.tar.gz
libdebian-installer4_0.48_amd64.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.48_amd64.deb
libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.48_amd64.udeb
libdebian-in
apt-setup_0.19_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apt-setup_0.19.dsc
apt-setup_0.19.tar.gz
apt-setup-udeb_0.19_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.19_all.udeb
apt-cdrom-setup_0.19_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-13 16:27]:
> I take it that netcfg's use of link detection doesn't make it default to
> eth1 in this case?
No, oldsys-preseed always sets netcfg/choose_interface. Although now
I'm starting to wonder whether this is a good idea...
> The rule could go in ro
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 February 2007 10:32, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Well, I must have been blind: I just didn't find anything in the
>> "manual partitioning" screen that looked like it would allow me to
>> create lvm volumes. But I must admit that I did not read that
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> No. If nic-modules is included (and hence the ixp4xx ethernet
> driver), USB will get eth1 and the installer won't work at all because
> it will use eth0, which is the ixp4xx device that doesn't work because
> of the missing microcode.
I take it that netcfg's use of link
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-13 12:54]:
> Is ixp4xx the flavor used for installs on NSLU2? In testing there was an
> nslu2 flavor, but that's no longer present in unstable.
>
> I understood that ixp4xx is the flavor being used.
ixp4xx is the platform and NSLU2 is one ixp4xx devi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> reassign 407460 debian-installer
Bug#407460: USB ethernet interface renamed after installation on NSLU2 which
causes the system to be inaccessible
Bug reassigned from package `nic-us
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-13 15:38]:
> > No, nic-modules is not included on the ixp4xx image.
>
> So the right package is debian-installer and the bug can be fixed by
> adding nic-modules?
No. If nic-modules is included (and hence the ixp4xx ethernet
driver), USB will get eth1 and
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 03:27:36PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > severity 407460 important
> > reassign 407460 nic-usb-modules-2.6.18-4-ixp4xx-di
> > thanks
> What does nic-usb-modules-2.6.18-4-ixp4xx-di have to do with this?
Is ixp4xx the flavor used for installs on NSLU2?
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-13 15:24]:
> > Er, it is included in d-i:
>
> No, nic-modules is not included on the ixp4xx image.
So the right package is debian-installer and the bug can be fixed by
adding nic-modules?
--
see shy jo
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-13 15:24]:
> Er, it is included in d-i:
No, nic-modules is not included on the ixp4xx image.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Op 13-02-2007 om 02:16 schreef Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 08:30:52PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > > surely, apart from anything else, you must _have_ such scripts, to do
> > > the daily builds?
> >
> > That's what the debian-insta
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 410837 installation-reports
Bug#410837: NO keyboard lags 1 letter
Warning: Unknown package 'debian'
Warning: Unknown package '3'
Warning: Unknown package '1r4'
Warning: Unknown package 'etch'
Warning: Unknown package 'i386'
Warning: Unknown pac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 410837 console-data 2002.12.04dbs-49
Bug#410837: NO keyboard lags 1 letter
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `console-data'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Steve Langasek wrote:
> severity 407460 important
> reassign 407460 nic-usb-modules-2.6.18-4-ixp4xx-di
> thanks
What does nic-usb-modules-2.6.18-4-ixp4xx-di have to do with this?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Gordon Farquharson wrote:
> On 2/12/07, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >The problem seems as simple as that the ipx4xx driver is *not* included in
> >d-i, but is included in the installed kernel; so in the installer, the
> >module is never loaded resulting in the USB adapter getting th
Package: Debian 3,1r4 (Etch, i386 net install)**
Version: 2.6.18-3-686
When I type æ (ae) ø (slash o) å (aa), the next key I press will have the
last for the æøå insted of what I pressed.
So if I press "æ", then press "n" the letter it will show is "æ" and not "n"
as normal.
The graphics in Midn
Your message dated Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:09:58 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410825:
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 07:20:22PM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 07:00:55PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Keeping the "*" at the end changes the test for GenuineTMx86, which would
> > be a regression.
>
> Damn me, nice you spotted that one. I should have tested it back int
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 06:52:38PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 February 2007 18:10, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> > I am currently setting up a documentation to use the official Debian
> > Installer with the official Debian kernels on that machine. Once done,
> > I will put a link on the Deb
Package: installation-reports
Boot method:
image
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
date:
Di 13. Feb 19:32:14 CET 2007
Machine: Terra Wortmann AG
Processor: Pentium IV (3 GB)
Memory: 1GB
Partitions:
df -Tl
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 07:20:22PM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 07:00:55PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Keeping the "*" at the end changes the test for GenuineTMx86, which would
> > be a regression.
>
> Damn me, nice you spotted that one. I should have tested it back int
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 07:00:55PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Keeping the "*" at the end changes the test for GenuineTMx86, which would
> be a regression.
Damn me, nice you spotted that one. I should have tested it back into
qemu afterwards...
Cheers,
--
.''`. Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :' :
`. `'`
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 410819 + pending
Bug#410819: Please add VIA C7 processor definition
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 410815 wishlist
Bug#410815: ppc daily netinst CD (12-Feb-07) missing ibmveth module
Severity set to `wishlist' from `grave'
> reassign 410815 linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6
Bug#410815: ppc daily netinst CD (12-Feb-07) missing ibmveth module
Bug r
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 18:10, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> Please consider the attached patch against the current SVN.
I've made one correction relative to the patch:
- " GenuineIntel"|" GenuineTMx86"|" CentaurHauls"*)
+ " GenuineIntel"|" GenuineTMx86"*|" CentaurHauls"
severity 379205 wishlist
thanks
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 09:43:22AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> With 2.6.16 we now also have xen and vserver kernel flavors. Currently
> these are just listed as available kernels.
> Possibly checks can be added so they are only shown in a xen resp. vserver
> environ
tags 410819 + pending
thanks
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 18:10, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> I am currently setting up a documentation to use the official Debian
> Installer with the official Debian kernels on that machine. Once done,
> I will put a link on the Debian Wiki.
OK, so that is targeted at
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 379205 wishlist
Bug#379205: base-installer: more explicit support for xen and vserver kernels
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
severity 410815 wishlist
reassign 410815 linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6
tags 410815 pending
thanks
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 17:35, Cort, Tom wrote:
> Severity: grave
This does not even come close to being grave. It is merely a request to
support this driver in installations so that your particul
Package: base-installer
Version: 1.72
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
A popular French datacenter called Dedibox [1] is using a specifically
built motherboard with a VIA C7 processor. Via a secure web interface,
you can install Debian Sarge among other distros (with their untrusty
closed sourc
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 10:32, Frank Küster wrote:
> Well, I must have been blind: I just didn't find anything in the
> "manual partitioning" screen that looked like it would allow me to
> create lvm volumes. But I must admit that I did not read that part of
> the installation guide in advanc
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 05:30, Rick Thomas wrote:
> To what package should I send a bug report with that payload?
linux-2.6
Suggest you add a [powerpc] tag in the subject of the BR.
pgpY2gQ8EjZnP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 08:50, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I'm sorry that you misunderstood. That kernel was supposed to be the
> final ABI, not the final kernel version.
Well, I understood it to be the final kernel as well. That is why I
started preparations for RC2.
I agree with Christian. I'm
Yeni Dünya Dergisi
YENİ DÜNYA DERGİSİNDEN
HEYCAN DOLU BİR ÖZEL SAYI
AHMET EDİP BAŞARAN
Yeni Dünya dergisi, Şubat sayısında çok önemli bir özel sayıya
imza
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.66
Severity: normal
The gnome-desktop task includes the grdesktop package. However it is
maintained by the QA team and I don't think there is much interest in
it. The same functionality, and much more, is provided by tsclient,
which is generally up-to-date and mainta
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 12 February 2007 20:02, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Comments/Problems:
>> - The only thing that annoyed me is that there was no (obvious) way to
>> get lvm set up, yet still configure the sizes of my partitions
>> manually (I need much larger /var th
60 matches
Mail list logo
