Sorry for the late reply. The forewarding via BTS to my mail address
seems to be broken and I'm not subscribed to the list. Please CC me
to ensure quick answer.
> BTW, this seems to be a bug in installation-report: The installer
> logs are not any more in /var/log/debian-installer but in
> /va
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> It appears to work after pressing the
Enter key on the number pad, then
> pressing the Enter key on the keyboard. I was able to duplicate this
> on the serial console as well. I get a ^M when I'm on the serial
> console after pressing the number pad Enter ke
Agustin Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Details of my installation,
>
> * debian-testing-i386-binary-1.iso RC1 DVD installation image
> * 4000MB qemu target image, single partition + swap, no network
> * German locales (But spanish keyboard for my convenience)
> * Tasks: Desktop Umgebung + St
<>
Your message dated Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:35:27 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
However, we can do limitededition prints, numbered and signed by Asbjorn
Lonvig, as well.
Most of the 'wealth' stemmed not from ability, but from political
maneuvering. As a point of departure editions are open.
Operates in Freeware mode when not registered.
Keep up the good work my man. To switch
> Comments/Problems:
> The only "OMG" show stopper was that the system is using the
> wrong driver for my wireless card. on boot up, the system will
> hard lock after loading the hostap/hostap_cs drivers for my
> card. my solution was to boot up w/out the card, and
> blacklist the hostap/hostap_c
Joey wrote:
>I don't belive that this bug is actually RC: There's a workaround for
>the problem in debian-cd, and the bug's not causing any other
>problems that I know of.
I'm happy for this to be tagged etch-ignore, but it can potentially
lead to data loss so I think it should stay as serious in
Please describe your education and training that has prepared you for
this position.
Gas or Steam Turbines?
Qualified candidates must have a BS in Mechanical Engineering,
Professional Engineers preferred but not required. Candidate must be a
degreed ME or IE, with exp working with technical data,
Pous plus d'infos et pour s'inscrire voir sur ce site.
During bimonthly job fairs the company hosts, each candidate interviews
with six Zappos.
"You've just downloaded an .
Next was the administration of the PayPerShop directory and news pages.
Make "wow" a part of your company' vocabulary. How ca
Your message dated Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:32:42 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402547: debian-installer: OldWorld beige G3 Macintosh bmac
network interface disabled on reboot
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
On Dec 11, 2006, at 5:39 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
Rick Thomas wrote:
In interesting image... (<-8) Can you be a little more specific
about how to go about doing this?
If networkmanager is running I assume you are logged into a desktop
environment that has some kind of netowork manager applet (i
I don't belive that this bug is actually RC: There's a workaround for
the problem in debian-cd, and the bug's not causing any other problems
that I know of.
--
see shy jo, fairly heavy user of gzip >> file.gz
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401685: fixed in rootskel-gtk 1.02
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401685: fixed in rootskel-gtk 1.02
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401710: fixed in installation-report 2.24
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Rick Thomas wrote:
> In interesting image... (<-8) Can you be a little more specific
> about how to go about doing this?
If networkmanager is running I assume you are logged into a desktop
environment that has some kind of netowork manager applet (in the status
notification area in gnome for ex
On Dec 11, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
Joey: does this impact your decision to install networkmanager by
default?
It's a data point.
I'd imagine that one can get networkmanager to deal with the interface
by prodding it in the gui though.
--
see shy jo
In interes
Accepted:
localechooser_1.33.dsc
to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_1.33.dsc
localechooser_1.33.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_1.33.tar.gz
localechooser_1.33_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_1.33_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
loca
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.47_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_1.47_i386.udeb
rootskel_1.47.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.47.dsc
rootskel_1.47.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.47.tar.gz
rootskel_1.47_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.4
Accepted:
rootskel-gtk_1.02.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel-gtk/rootskel-gtk_1.02.dsc
rootskel-gtk_1.02.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rootskel-gtk/rootskel-gtk_1.02.tar.gz
rootskel-gtk_1.02_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel-gtk/rootskel-gtk_1.02_amd64.udeb
Override entries for your package:
rootskel-
Accepted:
installation-report_2.24.dsc
to pool/main/i/installation-report/installation-report_2.24.dsc
installation-report_2.24.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/installation-report/installation-report_2.24.tar.gz
installation-report_2.24_all.deb
to pool/main/i/installation-report/installation-report_2.
package: cdebconf-gtk-udeb
severity: normal
tags: patch
Suppose a SELECT question has options
mickey
goofy
donald
goofy
and goofy (present twice in the options list) is the default option:
you'll get a crash under directfb and a warning under x11 as soon as the
question gets displayed.
The cr
rootskel-gtk_1.02_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel-gtk_1.02.dsc
rootskel-gtk_1.02.tar.gz
rootskel-gtk_1.02_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
rootskel_1.47_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_1.47.dsc
rootskel_1.47.tar.gz
rootskel_1.47_i386.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.47_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
localechooser_1.33_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
localechooser_1.33.dsc
localechooser_1.33.tar.gz
localechooser_1.33_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
installation-report_2.24_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
installation-report_2.24.dsc
installation-report_2.24.tar.gz
save-logs_2.24_all.udeb
installation-report_2.24_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Your message dated Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:32:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400542: fixed in tasksel 2.59
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:32:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400251: fixed in tasksel 2.59
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:32:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400154: fixed in tasksel 2.59
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Frans Pop wrote:
> Joey: does this impact your decision to install networkmanager by default?
It's a data point.
I'd imagine that one can get networkmanager to deal with the interface
by prodding it in the gui though.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Accepted:
tasksel-data_2.59_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel-data_2.59_all.deb
tasksel_2.59.dsc
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.59.dsc
tasksel_2.59.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.59.tar.gz
tasksel_2.59_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.59_all.deb
Override entries f
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (Please always reply to the bug report
rather than individual persons.)
It looks like the message I replied to was not CC'd to the mailing list. I'll
make sure to CC the list from now on.
On Monday 11 December 2006 21:14, you wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> >
tasksel_2.59_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
tasksel_2.59.dsc
tasksel_2.59.tar.gz
tasksel_2.59_all.deb
tasksel-data_2.59_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 401396 debian-installer
Bug#401396: 20061202 - daily build for sparc32 floppy install
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `debian-installer'.
> retitle 401396 [sparc] Single does not work on root floppy prompt
Bug#401396: 20
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 402410 partman-auto-lvm
Bug#402410: debian-installer: LVM setup broken if hostname/VG contains a "-"
character
Bug reassigned from package `partman-base' to `partman-auto-lvm'.
> tags 402410 + patch pending
Bug#402410: debian-installer: LVM s
(Please always reply to the bug report rather than individual persons.)
On Monday 11 December 2006 21:14, you wrote:
> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just tried today's testing boot floppies along with a CG6
> > framebuffer, Sun monitor, and Sun Type5 keyboard. It still looks
> > like i
reassign 402410 partman-auto-lvm
tags 402410 + patch pending
thanks
On Monday 11 December 2006 20:36, Mike Hommey wrote:
> the hyphen is a valid character, but it is doubled in the /dev/mapper
> device name (because the hyphen separates VG and LV names). Note that
> the /dev/$VG/$LV mapping doesn'
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
At network configuration time, you can decide not to configure the
network. But nevertheless, d-i keeps complaining at several occasions
that it can't contact the apt archive: once for the mirrors
configuration, and once for the security archive. While I'
On Dec 11, 2006, at 2:08 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 11 December 2006 09:26, Rick Thomas wrote:
After installing etch from a daily netinst CD (2006/12/10 20:42
UTC) on
my beige G3 (OldWorld) PowerMac machine, the builtin ethernet
interface
is disabled.
[...]
There is a strange and pos
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 07:40:13PM +0100, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 10 December 2006 10:45, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > As a hostname for this testbed, I chose "qemu-test", which, as far as I
> > know is a valid hostname.
> >
> > When d-i was creating the filesystems, it complaine
On Monday 11 December 2006 09:26, Rick Thomas wrote:
> After installing etch from a daily netinst CD (2006/12/10 20:42 UTC) on
> my beige G3 (OldWorld) PowerMac machine, the builtin ethernet interface
> is disabled.
[...]
> There is a strange and possibly relevant thing in syslog
>
> Dec 11 02:34:4
On Monday 11 December 2006 19:40, Frans Pop wrote:
> So what is the actual bug here:
> - a hyphen is not a valid character after all
If we would decide not to allow hyphens I guess we can easily make a
hostname containing them valid by replacing hyphens with underscores.
pgpRxXRQq2WCg.pgp
Descr
Your message dated Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:54:04 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401125: Etch - AMD64 Network Installation (netinst) "Bad
Archive Mirror"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
On Sunday 10 December 2006 10:45, Mike Hommey wrote:
> As a hostname for this testbed, I chose "qemu-test", which, as far as I
> know is a valid hostname.
>
> When d-i was creating the filesystems, it complained it wasn't able to
> find /dev/mapper/qemu-test-* devices, and checking in the console
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> reassign 401432 apt-setup
Bug#401432: debian-installer: security.debian.org should not be mandatory in
expert mode
Bug reassigned from package `apt-setup' to `apt-setup'.
>
End of m
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 07:45:55PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
> I might have time next Monday to try a qemu installation of the RC1 DVD
> after your values. Cannot promise however, because it is rather slow and
> will take some hours.
Done, and I could not reproduce the problem, everything work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans,
Please close this bug. It was my fault. I apologize for the wasted time
and effort on your side. The HP server I received was mis-labeled on the
rear. I figured out that eth0 was actually labeled '2' on the rear.
Jeez... can't take me anywher..
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 402606 partman-base
Bug#402606: installation-report: partitioner does not update partition type
when using previous NTFS partition
Bug reassigned from package `installation-report' to `partman-base'.
> severity 402606 important
Bug#402606: in
Package: installation-report
Severity: normal
I installed etch on an old pc, using manual partitioning. I selected an
existing NTFS partition (/dev/hda1) as ext3 root filesystem.
The partition was formatted, and installation went ok until installation of
grub. Grub-install could not install stag
Hello Bob,
I'm one of Debian GRUB maintainers and I'm not aware of any know bug
with 2500GB. Where have you got that information?
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG I
Hi,
Thanks for your mail. It's appreciated.
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 16:09, AlesD wrote:
> I'm going to install Debian on HP workstation (c3700) sometime
> between 18th and 22th of December. There is currently HP-Unix so the
> server will be installed "from scratch". Since the HP-PA architec
Eduardo Silva wrote:
--- Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Eduardo Silva wrote:
[cut]
Yes :) I think that the creator of the current
look,
Andre Ferreira, may be wanting to do that as well,
but
I think the more icons done, the better :)
I guess you're talking about thes
Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 08 December 2006 16:13, Bob Apodaca wrote:
Grub fails to install on AMD64, when I check the virtual console the
command given is: apt-install grub
Starting a shell and using "chroot /target apt-get install grub" works
fine. After that, using the installer grub will in
The patches below to rootskel and rootskel-gtk combine your original patch
and the later one and also keep the bulk of the work where it belongs:
in rootskel-gtk.
Please check.
Index: rootskel-gtk/src/lib/debian-installer.d/Makefile
On Monday 11 December 2006 11:54, Holger Levsen wrote:
> As I wrote in another bug-report (#401889 iirc), this doesnt work well
> (at least on powerpc): with 96mb I could ran g-i, but the partioner
> would frequently crash due to too little memory.
>
> So this limit should be raised to 128mb on pow
Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 10 December 2006 12:28, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 10 December 2006 03:36, Frans Pop wrote:
Still "crashes" in the same way. The jump when I move the mouse for
the first time is _a lot_ bigger. Still completely freezes after that
and still only a grey screen with a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 328498 with 402570
Bug#328498: switch to cdebconf as default
Was blocked by: 321038 327730 331730 331731 331732 331733 331734 331735 331736
331737 331738 331739 331740 331741 331742 331743 331744 331745 331746 331747
331748 331749 331750 331751
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.18-3-486-di_1.40_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.18-3-486-di_1.40_i386.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.18-3-486-di_1.40_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.18-3-486-di_1.40_i386.udeb
cdrom-modules-
Hi,
On Saturday 09 December 2006 15:31, Frans Pop wrote:
> The g-i has a separate check for available memory and should fall back
> automatically to the NEWT frontend if the system has insufficient memory
> to run it. So it does not need a separate warning in the help screens.
As I wrote in anoth
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.40_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.40.dsc
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.40.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.18-3-486-di_1.40_i386.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.18-3-486-di_1.40_i386.udeb
nic-extra-modules-2.6.18-3-486-
On Sat, December 9, 2006 19:23, Frans Pop said:
> On Saturday 09 December 2006 18:05, David Härdeman wrote:
>> +# NOTE: Only commented out because we might want to reenable this
>> post-Etch
>
> Hmmm. That seems contradictory: either p-c is ready or it is not.
I wanted to keep the lines for t
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 01:56:46AM +0100, Ulrich Teichert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've used the netboot iso images from Friday. Netbooting the kernel
> on the PowerstackII went well, CD detection was OK, but I ran into
> the already reported problem:
>
> Invalid Release file: no entry for main/binary-po
Your message dated Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:32:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402102: fixed in hw-detect 1.45
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Accepted:
archdetect_1.45_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/archdetect_1.45_amd64.udeb
disk-detect_1.45_all.udeb
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/disk-detect_1.45_all.udeb
ethdetect_1.45_all.udeb
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/ethdetect_1.45_all.udeb
hw-detect_1.45.dsc
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/hw-dete
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
After installing etch from a daily netinst CD (2006/12/10 20:42 UTC) on my
beige G3 (OldWorld) PowerMac machine, the
builtin ethernet interface is disabled. This box has two ethernet interfaces:
eth0: D-Link RTL8139
eth1: builtin "bmac" on the mother
On Saturday 09 December 2006 19:41, toga wrote:
> I'm a newbie, for me it is chinese, but i understand that important
> devices are missing from /dev, for example sda2, which is my linux
> partition (all sda devices are missing).
It may be that your system does not work with the 2.6.17 kernel, but
67 matches
Mail list logo
