Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.40_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_1.40_i386.udeb
rootskel_1.40.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.40.dsc
rootskel_1.40.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.40.tar.gz
rootskel_1.40_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.4
Accepted:
floppy-retriever_1.10.dsc
to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_1.10.dsc
floppy-retriever_1.10.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_1.10.tar.gz
floppy-retriever_1.10_all.udeb
to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_1.10_all.udeb
load-floppy_1.
floppy-retriever_1.10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
floppy-retriever_1.10.dsc
floppy-retriever_1.10.tar.gz
floppy-retriever_1.10_all.udeb
load-floppy_1.10_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
rootskel_1.40_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_1.40.dsc
rootskel_1.40.tar.gz
rootskel_1.40_i386.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.40_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Thursday 12 October 2006 21:52, Ivan Cormeau wrote:
> Comments/Problems: installer got stuck for a long time (10 mins) while
> configuring "portmap", and later froze 73% into base system when
> starting configuring "gconf2-common"
The first one is a known issue that was fixed after the release
Your message dated Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:25:56 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #391432 missunderstanding text in "Loading additional
components": DONE
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 04:04:55PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > - I'd like to see two separate templates for the first driver floppy
> > and for any further driver floppies. The second template should be
> > something like "Load drivers from another floppy?".
> > The default from that template
Hi Frans,
Glad to see you back up and about on Debian lists. :)
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 11:40:08AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> GENERAL STATUS
> ==
> The most important work planned for RC1 has been done and the installer in
> general works well, although some finishing touches and test
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 07:22:08PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
Attached is a sort of tested patch for this. It works for me, but it
tries to do more that I can test.
Thanks, I'll take a look at it during the weekend
--
David Härdeman
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst CD
Image version: http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ [AMD64] Etch beta
3 Version, Oct 11, 2006
Date: Oct 11, 2006
Machine: self-assembled, ASUS A8N-SLI DeLuxe mobo, 1 IDE HD, 2 SATA HD
Processor: AMD Opteron 165 Double Core overclock
Your message dated Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383221: fixed in discover-data 2.2006.10.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#357488: fixed in discover-data 2.2006.10.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 392221 partman-auto-crypto: Please add support for loop-aes auto
> install
Bug#392221: Support alternative setups
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
Your message dated Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392418: fixed in discover-data 2.2006.10.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375036: fixed in discover-data 2.2006.10.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 392080 patch
Bug#392080: Swap check fails for swap-on-LVM-on-crypto
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Your message dated Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323294: fixed in discover-data 2.2006.10.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
tags 392080 patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is a sort of tested patch for this. It works for me, but it
tries to do more that I can test.
dmsetup deps returns a list of dependencies, this attempts to break them
apart and check each in turn. I'm not sure that this is the correct
approach.
It allows me
Your message dated Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387617: fixed in discover-data 2.2006.10.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336835: fixed in discover-data 2.2006.10.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Accepted:
discover-data_2.2006.10.12-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/d/discover-data/discover-data_2.2006.10.12-1.diff.gz
discover-data_2.2006.10.12-1.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover-data/discover-data_2.2006.10.12-1.dsc
discover-data_2.2006.10.12-1_all.deb
to pool/main/d/discover-data/discover-data_2.20
discover-data_2.2006.10.12-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover-data_2.2006.10.12-1.dsc
discover-data_2.2006.10.12.orig.tar.gz
discover-data_2.2006.10.12-1.diff.gz
discover1-data-udeb_2.2006.10.12-1_all.udeb
discover-data_2.2006.10.12-1_all.deb
> BTW, if you need the highcontrast engine as well, it should be possible
> now Loïc is building a gtk2-engines-udeb package.
I've just built a g-i mini.iso [1] containing the udeb created by Loïc [2]
In case anyone wanted to try and rebuild it here's what I've done:
* copy gtk2-engines-udeb_2.
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i_manual/log/en.log
===
It is possible to u
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
!!! There were errors during the build process.
!!! Please check the log and correct the errors.
Only architectures (if any) that were built correctly have been uploaded.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://people
Le jeudi 12 octobre 2006 à 17:47 +0300, Eddy Petrișor a écrit :
> [this is just a "are we sure that what we're doing is necessary" mail]
>
> Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> > My idea was including clearlooks engine dfb flavour into
> > libgtk-directfb-2.0-0-udeb package.
> > I know this is not very cl
[this is just a "are we sure that what we're doing is necessary" mail]
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le jeudi 12 octobre 2006 à 10:19 +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti a écrit :
>>
>>> I really suggest including the clearlooks engine into the gtkdfb udeb
>>> right now, test it and
On Thursday 12 October 2006 10:21, Frans Pop wrote:
> Based on that the following comments:
>
> - Joey noted yesterday that the "floppy 1 first" message has some
> translation issues (although translation is not essential, it is
> still important for localized derived distributions)
> I've cr
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-binary-1.iso
Downloaded 10 days ago I guess.
Date: 11 october 2006, at about 23:12
I used the installgui method :-)
Machine: Home made, Asu
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 12 octobre 2006 à 10:19 +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti a écrit :
I really suggest including the clearlooks engine into the gtkdfb udeb
right now, test it and make sure it works correctly in the case this
bugs couldn't be fixed in time for RC1.
In all cases this w
Le jeudi 12 octobre 2006 à 10:19 +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti a écrit :
> I really suggest including the clearlooks engine into the gtkdfb udeb
> right now, test it and make sure it works correctly in the case this
> bugs couldn't be fixed in time for RC1.
In all cases this would have to be a diffe
FYI. I received this mail sent to #379628.
Looks like this needs further investigation. I was not aware that XP used
3.1 too. However, I doubt that I am the person who is going to do it.
I can see if I can tighten the check if the NTFS partition is really Vista
or an older version of Windows.
O
Hi Silvain,
I've taken a closer look at the floppy changes this morning and committed a
few changes in your tree:
- Whitespace cleanup
- Synced floppy-retriever and rootskel with trunk
- Improved changelog entries
I've also tested the last available version of the floppies from your
website (27
Loïc Minier wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
With this mail i'm trying to investigate if using the clearlooks engine
as default in the graphical debian-installer is a reasonable idea.
Do you want me to upload a Gtk 2.10 with clearlooks?
Would you need the strndup() a
34 matches
Mail list logo
